Science More than one in eight Reddit users publish toxic posts

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

More than one in eight Reddit users publish toxic posts​

More than one in eight Reddit users publish toxic content, according to an analysis of more than 2 billion posts and comments on the social news aggregation platform.

Hind Almerekhi at Hamad Bin Khalifa University in Qatar and her colleagues gathered a data set of Reddit posts and their comments from between 2005 and 2020. They looked at any Reddit user who has posted on one of the 100 most popular subreddits – akin to forums on the site – as well as another subreddit. That filtering resulted in a total of 2.2 billion posts and comments from 1.2 million users across more than 100,000 subreddits.

To judge the toxicity of the comments, the researchers hired people through a crowdsourcing platform to manually label the toxicity level of a sample of 10,000 posts and comments. The team gave them very clear criteria on “what we consider highly toxic, slightly toxic and not toxic”, says Almerekhi. Each comment was assessed by at least three workers.

The resulting data set was used to train a neural network to categorise the toxicity of the remaining posts.

The algorithm found 2 per cent of posts and 6 per cent of comments were highly toxic. A further 7 per cent of posts and 11.5 per cent of comments were slightly toxic, with the remainder of posts and comments classed as not toxic. Highly toxic posts included direct insults and swear words, slightly toxic posts included milder insults (such as “hideous”), while not toxic posts contained neither.

Overall, around 16 per cent of people in the data set were responsible for toxic posts and 13 per cent for toxic comments. However, that behaviour could and did change depending on the community. Four in five people showed changes in the average amount of toxicity in their posts, depending on the subreddit they posted in.

Savvas Zannettou at the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands says that the analysis only focuses on the mainstream side of Reddit. This means it’s likely to understate the impact that a user who visits a fringe web community – which could be more toxic – will have, he says.

A Reddit spokesperson told New Scientist: “The study in question confirms our own research and insights: that the vast majority of content on Reddit is healthy, and users tend to positively adjust their behaviour in accordance with community norms.” They added that some of the data was approaching 20 years old so does not encapsulate how Reddit’s policies on speech have changed.
 
With the key words 'toxic' 'reddit' 'deep learning' and 'algorithm' it can be guaranteed this is some shitty partisan research.
 
Is there a more objective criteria for what constitutes a "toxic" post other than just what some random group of crowd sourced sensitive faggots think? I prefer the literal term. If my post didn't literally kill you then suck it up and shut the fuck up pussy.
 
If I were them I'd be more concerned about the other one-in-eight users that are masquerading as women and telling teenagers to take puberty blockers or hormones they imported from some eastern European farm supplier. Random shitposters aren't actually hurting anyone.

As the old saying goes: "Sticks and blocking testosterone may break my bones, but words can never hurt me."
 
That's a lot of wrongthink for one of the most jannied social media outbreaks in our generation.
People need an outlet; I personally go to [country]circlejerk forums, as it's mainly asshole expats mocking other expats, and it's fun. Only there could I get reddit silver for telling someone to find the nearest subway and huff some sarin.
 
If I were them I'd be more concerned about the other one-in-eight users that are masquerading as women and telling teenagers to take puberty blockers or hormones they imported from some eastern European farm supplier. Random shitposters aren't actually hurting anyone.

As the old saying goes: "Sticks and blocking testosterone may break my bones, but words can never hurt me."
1 in 8? That’s gotta be 75% of the site now.
 
Who judges what constitutes toxic?

You just know anything like “protect kids from drag shows” or “parents taking turns standing outside public bathroom after girl attacked” would be seen as toxic rather than a community caring about each other
 
"We sat down with Hind Almerekhi, a participant in Qatar National Research Fund's (QNRF) Qatar Research Leadership Program (QRLP) who is pursuing her PhD at Hamad Bin Khalifa University in computer science and engineering."

Welp, least this one isn't yet another psychologist.

As a real scientist though, she should damn well know better.
 
Back
Top Bottom