- Joined
- Dec 18, 2020
Question, there is usually this fight between MGS 2 vs 3 and I have been wondering what are the opinion of those here and if passage of time may or may not have altered some opinions (such as Raiden not being so hated anymore and the stuff the AIs talked about being disturbingly prophetic).
My thoughts are that Raiden is still shit, and in fact became more and more shit the further the series went on. I also don't give Kojima all the credit of his story being prophetic since I'd been hearing conspiracy theories very similar to what he conveys on Coast to Coast and from Alex Jones types around the same time as MGS2 launched.
MGS2 is a good game, but I think it wasn't the "perfection" of MGS1 formula like so many say simply because there is way too much focus on the tranq gun compared to enemy distraction and movement that was in MGS1. The tranq gun actually became a real crutch for the series in general. I do still really enjoy MGS2's soundtrack and atmosphere, probably more than MGS3.
I think MGS3 is the better game, simply because (even though it gets pretty cringe) the story is straightforward and and gameplay offers more flexibility and freedom than MGS2's.
Edit: Also Olga is the only great boss in MGS2, as on harder difficulties stealth can actually play a key factor in the fight. Fatman is a close second because it tried something new with the bomb disposal bits. The rest are meh to complete fucking shit.




