Merriam-Webster will update ‘racism’ definition after request

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Merriam-Webster will update ‘racism’ definition after request

tamar lapin.jpeg
By Tamar Lapin


Merriam-Webster Dictionary will be updating its definition of the word “racism” after a complaint from one Missouri woman, reports said on Tuesday.

Kennedy Mitchum, 22, led the charge for the dictionary to rework its entry last month, following the death of George Floyd while in the custody of four Minneapolis police officers.

= Kennedy Mitchum.jpeg
Kennedy Mitchum

“With everything going on, I think it’s important everyone is on the same page,” Mitchum told KMOV-TV.

The Florissant resident, a recent graduate of Drake University, said she was spurred to action by recent conversations she had about racism and injustice, where people would point to Merriam-Webster’s definition to dismiss her concerns.

Merriam-Webster’s first definition of racism is “a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.”

But Mitchum said that definition was too simple and could be used by people to overlook broader issues of racial inequality and emailed the 189-year-old company demanding change.

“I basically told them they need to include that there is systematic oppression on people. It’s not just ‘I don’t like someone,” it’s a system of oppression for a certain group of people,” Mitchum told the outlet.

Mitchum said she was surprised to receive a response, and that, after a couple of back-and-forth emails Merriam-Webster agreed a revision was needed.

“While our focus will always be on faithfully reflecting the real-world usage of a word, not on promoting any particular viewpoint, we have concluded that omitting any mention of the systemic aspects of racism promotes a certain viewpoint in itself,” read one of the emails she received.
Alex Chambers, the editor of Merriam-Webster Dictionary, told Mitchum that “this revision would not have been made without your persistence in contacting us about this problem.”

“We sincerely thank you for repeatedly writing in and apologize for the harm and offense we have caused in failing to address the issue sooner. I will see to it that the entry for racism is given the attention it sorely needs,” Chambers wrote.

A revision should be expected in the coming months, Chambers said, though he did not provide an exact date.
The dictionary’s current second definition of the term “racism” includes: “explicit institutional bias against people because of their race, and, second, a broader implicit bias that can also result in an asymmetrical power structure.”

“This second definition covers the sense that Ms. Mitchum was seeking, and we will make that even more clear in our next release,” Peter Sokolowski, editor at large at Merriam-Webster, said in a statement to The Post.

“This is the kind of continuous revision that is part of the work of keeping the dictionary up to date, based on rigorous criteria and research we employ in order to describe the language as it is actually used,” Sokolowski said.
Mitchum told CNN that she was “super happy” about the expected change.

“I really felt like that was a step in a good direction for a lot of positive change for a lot of different positive conversations that can really help change the world and helps change how people view things,” she said.
 
Buy yourself a good second hand dictionary. I used to have one from the 30s that had little illustrations and well detailed definitions. And no virtue signalling.
 
So now the "definition of racism" is officially "anything a white person does that isn't bending over to take a BBC in the ass, and even doing that is also racism"? Neato. Might as well start calling every black I see a "nigger" without provocative and form a bunch of lynching gangs. If you're "racist" no matter what you do, you might as well go all the way with it.
I know whites aren't directly mentioned here, but we all know "systematic oppression" is just a dog whistle for "Whitey bad".
 
So now the "definition of racism" is officially "anything a white person does that isn't bending over to take a BBC in the ass, and even doing that is also racism"? Neato. Might as well start calling every black I see a "nigger" without provocative and form a bunch of lynching gangs. If you're "racist" no matter what you do, you might as well go all the way with it.
Yeah, they'll probably define it by people who hold power and have privileges as the only ones who are capable of being racists.
 
As if people consult dictionaries before expressing strongly-worded opinions

The fucking socialists will claim this is the final win and the conversation is over because they can call anyone they like racist and if you even open your mouth you'll be met with "ARGUMENT OVER! CHECK A DICTIONARY BIGOT!"

Everyone else will continue on as before

Nothing will be lost except the credibility of another institution that foolishly bent the knee to the 7%
 
Last edited:
Alex Chambers, the editor of Merriam-Webster Dictionary, told Mitchum that “this revision would not have been made without your persistence in contacting us about this problem.”
alex chambers merriam webster.jpg
Alex Chambers, editor of Meriam-Webster
When Alex Chambers isn’t trying to beat people to a pulp in the Octagon, you’re likely to find her studying, “the physical and chemical properties and structures of stars, planets and other objects in outer space”.

That’s how the Merriam-Webster dictionary defines “astrophysics”, something Chambers is well versed in given she has a degree in the field. She has also graduated from Sydney University with degrees in science and mathematics for good measure, proving the UFC star’s talents lie with her brain as well as her fists.

Aptly nicknamed “Astro Girl,” the 37-year-old ditched her academic prospects in favour of mixed martial arts, making a name for herself when she appeared on the TV show The Ultimate Fighter.
sad clown motley sjw.jpg
 
She went to a four year university and all she did was pressure someone to change a definition? For fuck's sake, I got more from two years of college and nearly three non-consecutive years of unemployment. Maybe getting my bachelor's is in order...
 
Their new definitions that use the word they are defining don't even make sense. Even first graders aren't allowed to use the word in the definition of said word, why the fuck would Miriam-Webster do it?
 
The Asians better start speaking up for us, because they're next.
Our wardens don't have aeons-old hatred for East Asians though. Their religious texts demand only the subjugation of everyone else, whereas whites/europeans/amalek are marked for eradication as a necessity for their most holy one to appear, for them to achieve total dominance that they believe they are destined to and deserving of.

Asians will be fine as long as they can keep their nations ethnically homogenous. (Probably?) If they lose that, then they will be doomed like Western nations.
 
Is Merriam-Webster the only major English dictionary engaging in this sort of nonsense or are the rest just as bad? Curious if there are still any left who aren't letting modern politics sway their definitions.

The Oxford English Dictionary has been pretty bad with adding a lot of silly neologisms. Their "Word of the Year" is always something really stupid. Their 2017 Word of the Year was "youthquake", for example. I can't recall them being explicitly political like this, although I wouldn't doubt they've done some minor virtue signaling. My cynical take on these are that they're just marketing stunts. Regular people don't buy dictionaries anymore. Their main customers at this point are probably just schools, libraries, and software companies that need to integrate a dictionary and won't use any of the public domain or open-source ones.
 
Back
Top Bottom