Men, Where Have You Gone? Please Come Back. - Female pornographer laments men staying at home, playing vidya and wanking.

  • 🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Troy and I were having dinner at Mama Delia, one of the quieter spots. The sidewalk patio held five tables: three two-tops, including ours, and a pair pulled together for a group of eight women. At those tables, Troy was the only man.
The scene was beautiful — low lights, shared plates, shoulders angled in. The kind of evening people wait for all winter. Still, I found myself watching the crowd as it moved past us: women walking in pairs or alone, dressed with care. At table after table at the nearby restaurants, there was a noticeable absence of men — at least of men seated in what looked like dates.
Troy and I have known each other for almost 20 years. We met at Playboy, of all places, back when we were both learning how desire gets packaged, sold and sometimes misunderstood. We stayed close friends, bonded not just by our opinions, but by the effort it takes to stay in someone’s life.
That night, we made the effort. Still, what I saw unfolding around us felt like something else entirely: a collective shift I couldn’t unsee.
It started to become clear the previous April, when a man who had been pursuing me canceled a dinner at the last minute. There was a scheduling mix-up with his son’s game. I understood. I’m a hockey mom; I get it. Still, I went. I wore what I would have worn anyway. I took the table. I ordered well. And I watched the room.

Only two tables nearby seemed to hold actual dates. The rest were groups of women, or women alone, each one occupying her space with quiet confidence. No shrinking. No waiting. No apologizing.
That night marked something. Not a heartbreak, but an unveiling. A sense that what I’d been experiencing wasn’t just personal misalignment. It was something broader. Cultural. A slow vanishing of presence.

About grieving what’s not meeting us. And about refusing to dress it up as personal failure when it’s actually a collective reality.
So here’s what I’ll say: You are missed. Not just by me, but by the world you once helped shape.
We remember you. The version of you that lingered at the table. That laughed from the chest. That asked questions and waited for the answers. That touched without taking. That listened — really listened — when a woman spoke.
You are not gone, but your presence is thinning. In restaurants, in friendships, in the slow rituals of romantic emergence.
You’ve retreated — not into malice, but into something softer and harder all at once: Avoidance. Exhaustion. Disrepair.
Maybe no one taught you how to stay. Maybe you tried once, and it hurt. Maybe the world told you your role was to provide, to perform, to protect — and never to feel.

But here’s what’s real: We never needed you to be perfect. We needed you to be with us. Not above. Not muted. Not masked. Just with.
And you can still come back. Not by becoming someone else, but by remembering what connection feels like when it’s honest and slow. When it’s earned and messy and sacred.
We’re still here, those of us who are willing to cocreate something true. We are not impossible to please. We’re not asking for performances.
We are asking for presence. For courage. For breath and eye contact and the ability to say, “I’m here. I don’t know how to do this perfectly, but I want to try.”

Come back. Not with flowers or fireworks, but with willingness. With your whole, beautiful, imperfect heart.
We’re still here. And we haven’t stopped hoping.
As for me, I’ll keep showing up. Not because I’m waiting. Because I know what it feels like when someone finally arrives.

Oops, forgot my heckin Archive.
 
IIRC 44% of lesbians end up with a man later in life. Ever since I saw that study, I just assume that the 56% are too fucking fat and unpleasant to snag a man they feel entitles to.
I mean, the lesbos I've seen are either bitter hamplanets or college girls that realized they can get a lot of attention by holding hands and cuddling with some other cute girl.
Plus, much like with men, one must consider the correlation of homosexuality with history of molestation. All this LGBTQP shit is quite disturbing when you dig a bit.
I'd say the funniest thing you can do is to gather a bunch of hatefacts and spring them on unsuspecting "allies". Best case scenario you'll get blank stares, try it sometime.

The tell is how fucking ugly lesbians' partners are. It's obvious that fags are genuinely attracted to other men. They work hard at being attractive to each other and are very, very picky about physical attributes. The stereotype of a fag is a gymrat leather daddy or a prettyboy twink for a reason.

Typical lesbians put zero effort into being attractive. I don't believe for a minute that any woman became a lesbian because she finds morbidly obese broads in cargo shorts & crocs to be insanely hot.

All these women despite there professional success always come off as the most miserable people in existence.

I have been assured these women are super happy. Women are way better off with no man and no children.
 
The tell is how fucking ugly lesbians' partners are. It's obvious that fags are genuinely attracted to other men. They work hard at being attractive to each other and are very, very picky about physical attributes. The stereotype of a fag is a gymrat leather daddy or a prettyboy twink for a reason.

Typical lesbians put zero effort into being attractive. I don't believe for a minute that any woman became a lesbian because she finds morbidly obese broads in cargo shorts & crocs to be insanely hot.

Come to think of it, Dworkin cohabitated with a gay man.

Now I have to re-evaluate my whole worldview.
 
Last edited:
Only two tables nearby seemed to hold actual dates. The rest were groups of women, or women alone, each one occupying her space with quiet confidence. No shrinking. No waiting. No apologizing.
That night marked something. Not a heartbreak, but an unveiling. A sense that what I’d been experiencing wasn’t just personal misalignment. It was something broader. Cultural. A slow vanishing of presence.
Sorry but I just can't get past the precious, cloying, try-hard writing style.

Not a heartbreak, but an unveiling.

Good Lord, woman. Dial it back a little. My guess is dating is going on as it always has, but men have little to no romantic interest in women like her and those in her circles. What she refers to as no shrinking, no waiting, no apologizing quiet confidence translates to seething, neurotic, domineering bitch in most languages.
 
The tell is how fucking ugly lesbians' partners are. It's obvious that fags are genuinely attracted to other men. They work hard at being attractive to each other and are very, very picky about physical attributes. The stereotype of a fag is a gymrat leather daddy or a prettyboy twink for a reason.
It’s the same deal with troons at least psychologically speaking. The TERFs seething at men for AGP, it’s almost like we are devolving because of our big brains are like “well rape is out… “ so some contingency of men try to hold women collectively sexually accountable in a way that porn has failed by simultaneously making themselves a comical turboslut and acting like they’re aligned with women’s interests.

It’s like a psyop brought to you by Mother Nature because humans will find any irrational excuse to cum.
 
Sorry but I just can't get past the precious, cloying, try-hard writing style.

Not a heartbreak, but an unveiling.

Good Lord, woman. Dial it back a little. My guess is dating is going on as it always has, but men have little to no romantic interest in women like her and those in her circles. What she refers to as no shrinking, no waiting, no apologizing quiet confidence translates to seething, neurotic, domineering bitch in most languages.
It's the language of special and wonderful things inherent to being a woman, and it annoys the piss out of me.

It's every woman that marks her every accomplishment with insipid quotations like, "Nevertheless, she peristed".

I can only imagine that women who use statements like those are coping with being single by extolling the virtues of womanhood. Because, after all, "Only weak men are afraid of strong women."
 
Women whine about not being chased on the same accounts they whine about being left alone.
That's women speak for "I want my 6'4 millionaire dream man who is my age to chase me, and I want everyone else to not talk to me." The fact that it's always some basic bitch with several failed relationships behind her (and may even have a kid or two already) wanting guys who have all the options in the world just makes it funnier.
 

Feminists Are Begging For Men To Come Back But Still Blame Them For Everything​

One rule has remained true for generations when it comes to the division between the sexes: Men are held accountable for everything, women accept accountability for nothing.

Obviously, there’s going to be exceptions to the rule, but the majority of the time it is true that modern western women have a serious problem taking responsibility when things go wrong. They have been taught from a very early age that they are victims: Victims of men, victims of society, victims of “patriarchy”, victims of religion, victims of biology, victims of circumstance, etc.

The feminist movement is built entirely around the notion that women can weaponize their victimhood as a means to control society.

I continue to hold that feminism is the KEY movement that has undermined the success of western culture. Their zealotry has led to the destruction of the nuclear family (the most important factor in a healthy nation). They have helped to facilitate the near collapse of the west and this problem needs to be addressed before it’s too late.

I recently came across an article in the New York Times which explains the decline in western relationships in a way that is both hilarious and depressing. The essay is titled ‘Men, Where Have You Gone? Please Come Back’. The author (a 50-something woman from Chicago) recalls the old days of dating when men were easy targets for exploitation.

“We knew what worked. We knew how to frame a face, a gesture, a moment of implication — just enough to ignite fantasy and open a wallet. I came to understand, in exact terms, what cues tempt the average 18-to-36-year-old cis heterosexual man. What drew him in. What kept him coming back. It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless…”

“…That dynamic has quietly collapsed. We have moved into an era where many men no longer seek women to impress other men or to connect across difference. They perform elsewhere. Alone. They’ve filtered us out.”

The author insinuates that the era of easy money and easy sex for women was a product of the masculine dynamics of competition and status (blame men). Yet, she also seems to be waxing nostalgic, longing for those days to return. This was the “Sex And The City” era in the late 1990s and early 2000s that was born from the sexual revolution of second wave feminism. It was the era in which female promiscuity and greed was glorified as the ultimate expression of women’s empowerment.

The idea was to turn women’s early adult years into a Dionysian orgy; giving away sex to any man with decent looks and a fat wallet in the hopes of eventually trapping a lifetime pay-pig. Marriage and maybe family would come in their 30s (or maybe 40s), but not until they had achieved as much degenerate fun as they could muster.

The problem is, women are on a biological clock, which is why for thousands of years marriage was THE primary concern for the fairer sex. To waste their 20s giving away their bodies for nothing? That was unthinkable insanity. This would doom them to decades of misery as lonely old maids living off the charity of others, and frankly nothing has changed. Childless cat ladies are still a thing and they are still embarrassing.

Only in the first world are these women able to survive.

No one looks at a spinster and sees her as “powerful” or free. Everyone can smell her failure. Her desperation. Her cope. This is why, more and more, we are beginning to see a sense of panic among women who bought into the feminist con game. They’re realizing that men are not chasing them anymore.

It started out as a joke among woke leftists who laughed at the “rise of incels”. The number of single men refusing to enter the dating world was skyrocketing and the feminists said this was a good thing. Let the “ugly scrubs” wallow in their loneliness while the ladies go out and gorge on freedom and fun until they get sick. However, the trend has continued to the point that a majority of men are checking out completely.

Recent surveys reveal that 63% of young men ages 18-29 are single. Around 30% of men have not been sexually active for a year or more. In 1980, 60% of adults were married by the age of 25. Today, only 20% are married by age 25. Men are exiting relationships and marriage at record pace, and because men are the initiators of relationships (men are biologically designed to take risks and pursue), women are starting to feel the pinch.

The latest data predicts that 45% of women ages of 25 to 44 will be single and childless by the year 2030, and not necessarily by choice. If a woman is single and childless by the time she reaches her mid-30s, her chances of creating a family drop exponentially along with her fertility.

They are calling it the female loneliness epidemic and it’s bearing down on western society like a freight train. Even feminists are getting worried. As the New York Times opines:

“There was a time, not so long ago, when even a one-night stand might end with tangled limbs and a shared breakfast. When the act of staying the night didn’t announce a relationship, just a willingness to be human for a few more hours. Now, even that kind of unscripted contact feels rare. We’ve built so many boundaries that we’ve walled off the very moments that make connection memorable…”

“This idea that vulnerability is a threat instead of an invitation has created a culture of hesitation, of men circling intimacy but never entering it. And the result is thousands of tiny silos. Everyone performing closeness, but no one making a move that binds. Isolation. Loneliness. A hunger for contact that has nowhere to land…”

But of course, the Times doesn’t seem to think women are culpable in the slightest for this outcome. Instead, they continue the blame game:

“So here’s what I’ll say: You are missed. Not just by me, but by the world you once helped shape…”

“We remember you. The version of you that lingered at the table. That laughed from the chest. That asked questions and waited for the answers. That touched without taking. That listened – really listened – when a woman spoke.

You are not gone, but your presence is thinning. In restaurants, in friendships, in the slow rituals of romantic emergence. You’ve retreated – not into malice, but into something softer and harder all at once: Avoidance. Exhaustion. Disrepair.

Maybe no one taught you how to stay. Maybe you tried once, and it hurt. Maybe the world told you your role was to provide, to perform, to protect — and never to feel…”


Listen men, your lack of participation is starting to stress out the ladies. Just admit you can’t handle intimacy. Just admit you can’t handle these “powerful” women and their vast intellects and emotional genius. You need to be taught how to behave, that’s all. Just crawl back to them and they’re ready to tolerate you again. Isn’t that nice? They’re giving you a second chance…

At no point does the author ask WHY men are exhausted? At no point does she ask any actual men what they think or feel before writing her nonsensical screed. Obscured by insufferable and flowery prose, she still blames men while asking them to come back. And that should tell you everything you need to know about feminism in general.

I would ask feminists the million dollar question that they have avoided for so long: Have you considered the possibility that men ghost you and will not commit to you because YOU are the problem? The answer is no, obviously.

I’m a man in my mid-40s who thankfully dodged the bulk of wokeness in the dating world, but I think I can still explain for the NYT why men are walking away if they’re willing to listen.

1) First, I must say that an author in her 50s still longing for casual sitcom encounters like she’s in her 20s reveals a lot about why modern women are oblivious. Real life is not Sex In The City – Most men of means do not gravitate towards long term relationships with women in their grandma phase. She should already be in a happy relationship or marriage, she’s had plenty of time to figure this out.

Feminism has made women think they can engage with life on their own schedule. They can’t.

2) Men are especially wary of women with baggage. Women initiate 70% of breakups and divorces and feminist influence over family law has made divorce easier and more lucrative than ever for women. The older a woman is the more baggage she has and the less likely a man is going to want to date her seriously, let alone put an expensive ring on her finger.

Western women have been taught they need to party in their 20s, then pursue serious relationships in their 30s or 40s. Meaning, they ignore their best prospects for at least a decade. Their ideology sets them up to enter the relationship market when their marriage value is lowest.

3) Men are no longer tolerating the concept of the sexual revolution. They don’t want to take any chances on women who think promiscuity is a virtue. They know that statistically, women who sleep around lack discernment, the ability to connect, self respect and mental stability. Starting a relationship with such a person will only lead to disaster. They never stay happy for long (the grass is always greener). And so, men stay home. Want to get them back? Keep your body count low.

4) Third-Wave Feminists spent the better part of the last 20 years telling men they are pure evil for being masculine and wanting to chase women. So, men did what you asked of them – They stopped chasing you. They found other more interesting endeavors like their careers and their hobbies. If you want men to come back, perhaps you should APOLOGIZE for all those years of slander.

5) Modern women have greatly overestimated the usefulness of sex as a bartering tool for securing a man. If you want a man to stick around you’re going to have to show him love and respect, not just what’s inside your pants.

6) Men are far more conditioned to be alone than women are. Women are communal creatures. They rely on constant interactions, affirmations and group inclusion. Social media might fill the void for a while but it can’t give them what they really want – Intimate personal attention 24/7. Only a partner and children can give you that. In a battle of who can endure loneliness longer, men will win, so don’t make it into a battle.

7) I’ll tell you the biggest open secret that modern women still don’t understand – They claim that men are afraid of approaching them. They say that men today are “weak” and that they can’t handle the new era of the “boss babe”. They argue that men need to abandon their traditional masculine roles and act more feminine; this will make it easier for everyone to get along.

These are common jabs at the male ego designed to make men feel ashamed for distancing themselves from feminists. In reality, men value one thing above all else: Peace. If you can’t offer peace, then no man with any sense of self worth has a use for you. Feminists offer the opposite of peace, and so they have no value.

8, Feminism, like all Marxist movements, is obsessed with power. Everything they do is driven by a desire for power and control; not just over their own lives but over the world around them. Modern women say they want the same power as men, but they need to accept that no matter how much the scales are tipped in their favor through laws, government subsidies, easy college grants, DEI hiring and unfair divorce, they will never be like men.

The author suggests that men no longer shape the world because they have abandoned the current relationship dynamic. This is foolish. Men continue to shape everything around you. Every utility, every necessity, every government, nearly every company, your safety and security, your ability to be free, it’s all reliant on men. You have no power and you never will.

Feminist empowerment is a fantasy based on institutional leverage which men ALLOW them to have. Until they stop coveting power they can’t comprehend or handle the divisions between men and women will not be resolved. In short, if feminists want men to pay attention to them again, they will have to stop being feminists.
 
You're gonna shove the goalpost around but conservative women became happier than liberal women after 2000, increasing in the 2010s, and now in the 2020s it's the sharpest divide yet.

Mental health and reported happiness for lib women is awful, especially under 35.

If you want to so some source pulling there's Pew, CDC, etc.
You seem to be the one moving the goalposts here lol. Modern conservatism in the US is a very far cry from a culture where "Women shut up" Also, those polls (not about women, but about people in general) do not count for the fact that conservatives are more likely to not report their own mental health problems.
I live with a woman, I have for a long time, and my posts reflect what I learned the hard way.

She isn't happy if I engage with her in good faith, she's happy if I act like a man and tell her to shut up.

She isn't happy if she makes choices, she's happy if she feels like she's listened to and I make choices for her.

She isn't happy actually being independent, she's happy doing things for fun of her own choice sometimes but having me pick a lot for her most of the time.

She isn't happy engaging in conflict, negotiation, or brass tacks. She's happiest if her feelings are listened to.

She never really communicates in rational terms, she says things that might seem like someone has the wrong idea but the point is communicating her feelings about something. Once I realized she's basically saying "I'm upset about something" and stopped wasting our time with trying to engage with it at face value, and went "she's angry or upset or obliquely bitching or baiting me for 'man stuff'" she got a lot happier.

So did I, because she stopped bitching.

I'm 40 fucking years old, I've had plenty of LTRs and am in one now.

I'm literally going to court for this woman tomorrow.
Nice blogposts lmao. If anecdotal stories are valid, then I could use the story of the retarded guy I knew because of visits to say men are retarded: He was mantained by his wife, was an entitled retard who believed everyone else was against him in spite of family and wife trying their best to be supportive, and started arguments because of how no one ackhually valued him and his feelings, as if he was the only one that felt frustration, and overall refused to stand up for himself, needing his wife to stand for him even in filling paperwork lol. But I don't use it because I'm not mentally castrated enough to support radical feminism.
Who said it was a good thing?
You said you hoped they got created for everything that is good" multiple times.
You rarely make any claims that can be assessed and critiqued, you just use cheap sophistry and rhetorical tricks to pick at others. You occasionally venture an opinion every fifth or sixth post, but these opinions are so utterly bland and uncontroversial that they don’t deserve attention.
Try posting something of value and interest if you want that kind of engagement.
Lol you want me to act like an imageboard attention whore farming (yous) by one upping in controversy?
The burden of proof is not on me. The ones making the claims are people here that say shit like that the "Arab Empire" started collapsing because women were taking over certain positions previously dominated by men, in spite of saying this could happen sounding very stupid due to Islam's effects in the Arab world.
 
Last edited:
So, men did what you asked of them – They stopped chasing you. They found other more interesting endeavors like their careers and their hobbies. If you want men to come back, perhaps you should APOLOGIZE for all those years of slander.
I think even this guy underestimates how over it really is. If women all got together at The Meeting of the Women and unanimously voted to come back to men begging for forgiveness, there are now a couple generations of dudes who've learned to live without them.

There's just no taking the pee out of the pool.
 
like all Marxist movements, is obsessed with power. Everything they do is driven by a desire for power and control; not just over their own lives but over the world around them. Modern women say they want the same power as men, but they need to accept that no matter how much the scales are tipped in their favor through laws, government subsidies, easy college grants, DEI hiring and unfair divorce, they will never be like men.
Now while I agree with the article I do wanna say one thing about this.

Can we stop bringing this issue back to politics, This statement isn't wrong but..I don't think it remotely helps

Here is my list of things I require in a potential mate.

1. Don't be mentally ill to the point it is a part of your personality
2. No kids
3. Don't be grotesquely overweight and don't be grotesque in general.
4. Share at least one of my actual Hobbies so that we have something we can do together on a daily basis that isn't "sit and stare at TV"
5. Don't be a rude fucking asshole to me.
 
You said you hoped they got created for everything that is good" multiple times.
I said the artificial womb would be a good thing, and then you modified it by saying
why the authorities (biased against men) having such technology is a good thing?
I never said the authorities having it would be a good thing, and it won't be the "authorities" who create it, it'll be some private company that does. Regardless, it will be treated the same as firearms, the governments will have them, and some idiots will say private citizens should not. Overall (especially given private access/ownership) the artificial womb will be good.
 
I hate these retard whore women who take zero personal responsibility and assume men dropped out of dating "just because". Being a whore makes you a feminist because whores bring out the worst in men, even out of good men, and then these women believe that all men are like this towards all women at all times.
"All men are trash" is the type of black-and-white thinking typical of BPDs. I especially hate these old, malding women who at their big age still don't realize that they are the common denominator in all their failed relationships, and then go and write shitty articles about it as if there's not enough jewish propaganda out there in the world already.
 
1751949353834.webp


Yea fuck that noise.

Bit of a bump, but also this video made it to my youtoob feed.



The absolute state of dating in China.

Slav chicks have nothing on Chinese women, wow. :story:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom