Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
View attachment 2078047

Can gun experts tell me if fgc is a meme or actually useful thing? How autistic on a scale from 1-10 would someone in europe had to be to potentially risk 10 years in prison printing this?
Seems to be a pretty reliable design at this point, pressure bearing parts are made from metal so no safety concerns from that standpoint. If I lived somewhere like Japan I'd consider it but as it goes, I can (and have) legally acquired firearms that offer similar capabilities in the UK.
 
When you look into Sullivan's post AR-15 work in Singapore, the basic math of gun/charge/bullet only applies to manually operated arms.

Otherwise, an AK wouldn't/couldn't kick less when the gas port size is reduced. The impulse of the bolt+carrier hitting the rear of the receiver is absolutely a factor.

Consider holding a 12ga spaced off your shoulder before firing -- if you have already tried this, you will know that the theory of "it will have time to decelerate" is just a theory.
Again, this is the basics I’m putting here. There’s more math that goes into the movement of the bolt and such.
 
View attachment 2078047

Can gun experts tell me if fgc is a meme or actually useful thing? How autistic on a scale from 1-10 would someone in europe had to be to potentially risk 10 years in prison printing this?
Oh, 11 or 12 on that scale for sure. But the gun works, and is plenty reliable from reports.

Legally speaking, I think it would be best if you didn't break the law, but IIRC AR-15 hammer springs are legal to collect in all of Europe.
 
Can gun experts tell me if fgc is a meme or actually useful thing?
it's a working expedient firearm along similar lines as the STEN or Luty, but with modern manufacturing techniques in mind. it may be less useful considering round stock steel and machine tools can still reliably turn out STENs or M3's or whatever. it does have some caveats in the design due to manufacturing and the assumption of limited machining ability/knowledge though, but for those without a lathe or mill and access to AR and Glock parts, it's perfectly serviceable.
 
Last edited:
What are your guys thoughts on this video?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=IrHF00JncKU
This video is not mine but the AR he owns is the version I have also. I feel like for aesthetics, I am waiting for when does MAGPUL gets those 10/30 P magazines in stock where it looks like a 30 rounder but carries 10. And looking into this style of a pistol grip also over the shark fins.

Resurgent Arms Featureless AR-15 Rifle Grip

Juggernaut Featureless Grip

https://youtube.com/watch?v=IQG9RlzTu_c
Fyi there's a fair bit if debate regarding whether or not the Juggernaut qualifies as a "featureless" grip, due to thumb web not placing higher than top of trigger. The Resurgent Arms one is in the clear. The Sparrow is similar and also popular https://www.sparrowdynamics.com/Featureless-Grip-AR-p/crg-15.htm
 
Fyi there's a fair bit if debate regarding whether or not the Juggernaut qualifies as a "featureless" grip, due to thumb web not placing higher than top of trigger. The Resurgent Arms one is in the clear. The Sparrow is similar and also popular https://www.sparrowdynamics.com/Featureless-Grip-AR-p/crg-15.htm
I thought about switching from the Carbine mil spec fixed stock to a either an A2 or Fixed Rifle stock.

You think that is advantageous for a rifle like this?
 
What are your guys thoughts on this video?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=IrHF00JncKU
This video is not mine but the AR he owns is the version I have also. I feel like for aesthetics, I am waiting for when does MAGPUL gets those 10/30 P magazines in stock where it looks like a 30 rounder but carries 10. And looking into this style of a pistol grip also over the shark fins.

Resurgent Arms Featureless AR-15 Rifle Grip

Juggernaut Featureless Grip

Ledesma Arms California Compliance Grip

https://youtube.com/watch?v=IQG9RlzTu_c
He has a few points, but I would always be skeptical when someone is speaking in absolutes. I don't know his history, experience, training, home situation, et al.

That said, his comment on ".223 will tumble on contact, so it won't over-penetrate" is fuddlore. My own namesake did an experiment for that (AR is around the 7:30 mark):
 
Is it fedposting to ask about DIY 3D printed guns? because my country is anti-fun but shit is getting real so I'm gonna need some protection
 
I would only use frangible ammo in an AR for home defense. Something like Hornady's V-MAX 55gr varmint rounds (which are sold under the TAP Urban brand for LE use). There's just too much risk of overpen and taking out your neighbors dog or something. I know ARs are very popular for home defense but just not something I feel comfortable using when other options are available for that scenario.

I personally use an MP5 with 115g Speer Gold Dots for HD, but that's me.

EDIT:

@Cool Dog Check out Ivan the Troll's 3D printer files for receivers.
 
I would only use frangible ammo in an AR for home defense. Something like Hornady's V-MAX 55gr varmint rounds (which are sold under the TAP Urban brand for LE use). There's just too much risk of overpen and taking out your neighbors dog or something. I know ARs are very popular for home defense but just not something I feel comfortable using when other options are available for that scenario.

I personally use an MP5 with 115g Speer Gold Dots for HD, but that's me.

EDIT:

@Cool Dog Check out Ivan the Troll's 3D printer files for receivers.
What are your thoughts on the Ruger 10/22 for home defense.
 
What are your thoughts on the Ruger 10/22 for home defense.
Advantages: parts are common and it's an extremely easy to customize weapon

Downside: it's a bitch to clean and maintain.

If you're going use a 1022 for home defense just get a 22lr handgun instead.


The only reason to get a 22lr long gun of any kind in current year (and current political climate) is for pre emptive self defense.

Especially with sub sonic ammo, a silencer or a long barrel.
 
Last edited:
Advantages: parts are common and it's an extremely easy to customize weapon

Downside: it's a bitch to clean and maintain.

If you're going use a 1022 for home defense just get a 22lr handgun instead.


The only reason to get a 22lr long gun of any kind in current year (and current political climate) is for pre emptive self defense.

Especially with sub sonic ammo or a long barrel.
Further advantage: you won't blow your eardrums out if you have to fire it indoors without hearing protection. I got rid of a .357 because I fired it once outside without hpro and it was like someone jammed an icepick into my head. I can't even imagine what would happen if I had to let that motherfucker rip inside my house in the middle of the night.
 
Further advantage: you won't blow your eardrums out if you have to fire it indoors without hearing protection. I got rid of a .357 because I fired it once outside without hpro and it was like someone jammed an icepick into my head. I can't even imagine what would happen if I had to let that motherfucker rip inside my house in the middle of the night.
Right but if for home defense it's better to get a 22lr hand gun. If that's all you can get. Don't need a long gun in 22lr indoors. That's what the shot gun or bigger caliber gun is for.

People got the 22lr cause ammo was cheap and so they could practice more. Plus low recoil so easier to learn on.

Now? There isn't a nice reason to get a long gun in 22 unless it for varmint control.
 
What are your thoughts on the Ruger 10/22 for home defense.
I don't think .22 LR is a defensive round. Unless you get lucky and hit someone in the eye or some shit, or you put a gun to the back of their heads (which would probably be considered murder unless you live in a State that actually respects your right to self defense like Florida), you're not doing much against a human being with that round. Long and short of it is is that no matter what you use, it's going to be loud and messy (unless you have a suppressor on your HD gun). I like 9mm because modern 9mm has an absolute fuck ton of loads available for it that didn't exist when 10mm was a thing. .45 would be a decent HD round too since its fat and slow and won't over-penetrate things.

I can really only tell you what I think and what I'd do, though. You have to go with what you're most comfortable with in the end, I don't really like getting into caliber wars discussions because they always get insanely autistic and everyone has their own preferences.
 
Further advantage: you won't blow your eardrums out if you have to fire it indoors without hearing protection. I got rid of a .357 because I fired it once outside without hpro and it was like someone jammed an icepick into my head. I can't even imagine what would happen if I had to let that motherfucker rip inside my house in the middle of the night.
I wonder how did all those soldiers in the World Wars managed to survive with their hearing intact?
 
Good luck getting them to acknowledge that your hearing loss is service related.
 
He has a few points, but I would always be skeptical when someone is speaking in absolutes. I don't know his history, experience, training, home situation, et al.

That said, his comment on ".223 will tumble on contact, so it won't over-penetrate" is fuddlore. My own namesake did an experiment for that (AR is around the 7:30 mark):
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Qw8IiRgSMFQ
What about hollow-point ammunition? Would there still be a danger of over-penetration?
I actually loaded a few AK mags with Tulammo hollow-point as a "just in case" when things started getting crazy last summer.
 
Back
Top Bottom