Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • 🏰 Deploying update to the Tatarus security page. If you encounter issues, post here.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Falcos_Commisar said:
The 80X is really cool in .32

Now most Euros were limited, for a Very long time to .25 and .32 with .25 ACP being a wonderful caliber for little pocket pistols.

So you see the Baby Browning, Colt 1908 Vest Pocket and little Berettas being made up to the 1980s.
Click to expand...
plus, there wasn't as great a need for a actual combat pistol. the US and Europe were pretty safe. a pocket .32 or .25 is fine if the most you worry about are stray dogs and snakes.
 
fur fag said:
because one of their biggest markets is america...? most euros are disarmed but that doesn't keep glock from making modern ccw guns, nor does it prevent springfield, walther, and HK.
Click to expand...

Seriously? Beretta have a tiny market share and would be competing with the companies you named there which have better distribution and name recognition, like I said, it's a saturated market and an uncertain investment. Clearly they agree with me seeing how few their offerings are.
 
SaidNoOneEver said:
Magnum Research used to offer the Desert Eagle with a 10" barrel.

View attachment 9583330
Click to expand...

Admittedly, it has been a long time since I looked into them, but last I saw they still offered the 10" barrel as an option. They also had a 14" barrel for a few years IIRC.

TheOtherSideofMakeBelieve said:
Maybe it's recent events, maybe I'm just a degenerate, but the poor thing looks like it has a horrifically botched circumcision
Click to expand...

Better than your Deagle having monkey dick.
 
I recently found out about Bongland’s loophole to getting handguns. And wouldn’t this be considered an SBR in the states :story:
IMG_4633.png
 
Romulus augustulus said:
If you're shooting deer like it was built to do its not pointless. all these magnum pistols with extra long barrels are targeted at the demographic. it's a surprisingly (but niche) large market
Click to expand...

They're not just for handgun hunting. They're also good for target shooting, silhouette shooting, and bowling pin competitions.
 
Boney said:
No. Not even remotely close.
Click to expand...
Yeah to the normal person but you already know the retards at the ATF will call it an SBR because of the “”””stock””””.
Anakin Soywalker said:
What the fuck did they do to it?
Click to expand...
Their pistols have to have a long barrel and a “stock” so it can’t be concealable. This is basically a loophole in order for handguns to be legal in the UK
 
Anakin Soywalker said:
What the fuck did they do to it?
Click to expand...
The law they brought in after Dunblane to effectively ban handguns was based on on size criteria:
any firearm which either has a barrel less than 30 centimetres in length or is less than 60 centimetres in length overall, other than an air weapon, a small-calibre pistol, a muzzle-loading gun or a firearm designed as signalling apparatus
Click to expand...

so you got people making what were handguns now with comically large barrels and shit welded to the back that technically counts as a fixed stock, to get around the rules.
 

Justice Department Concludes Federal Ban on Handgun Sales to 18 to 20-Year-Olds is Unconstitutional and Cannot Be Criminally Enforced | Archive​

Today, the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel released a legal opinion concluding that the federal prohibition may not be enforced against licensed dealers selling handguns to otherwise law-abiding adults ages 18 to 20 consistent with the Second Amendment.

The Office of Legal Counsel’s new opinion explains that federal statutes 18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(1) and (c)(1) are inconsistent with the Second Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller, New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, and subsequent decisions including Wolford v. Lopez. These statutes generally prohibit federally licensed dealers from selling handguns or handgun ammunition to individuals under 21.

The Office of Legal Counsel determined that 18 to 20-year-olds are among “the people” protected by the Second Amendment. “Eighteen-year-olds may vote, serve on juries, be drafted, and face adult criminal penalties, including capital punishment,” said Assistant Attorney General T. Elliot Gaiser for the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel. "The Constitution protects the people’s right to keep and bear arms. The Department of Justice may not constitutionally seek to impose criminal penalties on dealers who sell handguns to law-abiding adults who, in nearly every other relevant respect, are members of the political community.”

Because the restrictions burden the ability of members of “the people” to acquire commonly used arms, they fall within the Amendment’s plain text and are presumptively unconstitutional. The Office of Legal Counsel found Founding era history or tradition of precluding legal adults from purchasing firearms to protect public safety. To the contrary, at the Founding, militia statutes overwhelmingly required service beginning at 18 and required enrollees to furnish their own arms.

The Office of Legal Counsel concludes that Section 922(b)(1) and (c)(1) may not be enforced to impose criminal penalties on dealers who sell handguns to a class of law-abiding adults who, in nearly every other relevant respect, are members of the political community.

Read the full opinion here.

1789755067633.png 1789755075168.png 1789755116954.png
 
Last edited:
CBS News is reporting that the decision to not appeal the Judge's ruling in Jensen Vs. ATF was personally made by Donald Trump himself, and not some faceless, nameless Bureaucrat in the DOJ. How will people still seething about bumpstocks cope with the information that it was Donald Trump himself who personally gave the order to let the biggest ever blow against the National Firearms Act literally ever stand?
 
AGPinochet said:
CBS News is reporting that the decision to not appeal the Judge's ruling in Jensen Vs. ATF was personally made by Donald Trump himself, and not some faceless, nameless Bureaucrat in the DOJ. How will people still seething about bumpstocks cope with the information that it was Donald Trump himself who personally gave the order to let the biggest ever blow against the National Firearms Act literally ever stand?
Click to expand...
No he didn’t. You’re all idiots getting SCAMMED by Trump again. He’s anti gun. He said take the guns FIRST while Feinstein was busy getting wet with excitement from rounding up all gun owners. This is why I’m voting for democrats because of how unhinged and gun grabbing the GOP actually is. Trump hasn’t moved the needle at all on being 2A.

I’m Jewish btw
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom