Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • 🏰 Deploying update to the Tatarus security page. If you encounter issues, post here.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Mori Seiki GV-503 said:
Picked one of them up that had been sitting on a shelf earlier this year, holy hell does it live up to the price tag. Hands down the best out of the box gun on the market, the end all be all of .45 design. Now all I need is to get the B&T suppressor and I'll be able to die happy if I never bought another pistol again.
Click to expand...

I've had mine over a decade. I paid $2000 out the door for it. Now they're $2700. Finest combat handgun ever made, regardless of caliber. Sometimes I wish I had gotten the SilencerCo Osprey 45 suppressor for it since it fits the shape of the Mark 23 so well, looking a lot like the OHWS prototype suppressor, but I'm glad I got the Hybrid 46M suppressor since it's so versatile and quiet.
 
San Diego County has sued 3D Printer filament manufacturer Polymaker, They are arguing that certain spools of 3D Printer filament, specifically those sold and marketed as "Creator Spools" (that is, those spools with the branding and association of various figures and content creators in the 3D printed gun sphere that Polymaker has ingratiated itself with) are actually firearms precursor parts designed to facilitate the unlicensed manufafture of unserialized firearms under California law, and are thus illegal to possess in the state. They want $2,500 from Polymaker for each day they marketed such spools, of which there are several, and said spools have existed for years in some cases, potentially leaving Polymaker on the hook for millions


Screenshot_20261016-130502.png


Screenshot_20261016-130107.png

The CADOJ also considers a featureless block of aluminum to be a firearms precursor part specifically because it is marketed as one, despite being indistinguishable from any other block of aluminum of the same size
Screenshot_20261016-130210.png

Lawsuit
 

Attachments

AGPinochet said:
San Diego County has sued 3D Printer filament manufacturer Polymaker, They are arguing that certain spools of 3D Printer filament, specifically those sold and marketed as "Creator Spools" (that is, those spools with the branding and association of various figures and content creators in the 3D printed gun sphere that Polymaker has ingratiated itself with) are actually firearms precursor parts designed to facilitate the unlicensed manufafture of unserialized firearms under California law, and are thus illegal to possess in the state. They want $2,500 from Polymaker for each day they marketed such spools, of which there are several, and said spools have existed for years in some cases, potentially leaving Polymaker on the hook for millions


View attachment 9719200


View attachment 9719189

The CADOJ also considers a featureless block of aluminum to be a firearms precursor part specifically because it is marketed as one, despite being indistinguishable from any other block of aluminum of the same size
View attachment 9719196

Lawsuit
Click to expand...

This shit needs to go before SCotUS and get nipped in the bud most ricky-fucking-tick. There is nothing illegal about manufacturing your own firearms, regardless of the tools you use to make them.
 
AGPinochet said:
San Diego County has sued 3D Printer filament manufacturer Polymaker, They are arguing that certain spools of 3D Printer filament, specifically those sold and marketed as "Creator Spools" (that is, those spools with the branding and association of various figures and content creators in the 3D printed gun sphere that Polymaker has ingratiated itself with) are actually firearms precursor parts designed to facilitate the unlicensed manufafture of unserialized firearms under California law, and are thus illegal to possess in the state. They want $2,500 from Polymaker for each day they marketed such spools, of which there are several, and said spools have existed for years in some cases, potentially leaving Polymaker on the hook for millions


View attachment 9719200


View attachment 9719189

The CADOJ also considers a featureless block of aluminum to be a firearms precursor part specifically because it is marketed as one, despite being indistinguishable from any other block of aluminum of the same size
View attachment 9719196

Lawsuit
Click to expand...
So apparently anything is a gun precursor part if someone says it is? Someone should slap a sign that says gun parts on the pipe section of Home Depot.
 
AGPinochet said:
San Diego County has sued 3D Printer filament manufacturer Polymaker, They are arguing that certain spools of 3D Printer filament, specifically those sold and marketed as "Creator Spools" (that is, those spools with the branding and association of various figures and content creators in the 3D printed gun sphere that Polymaker has ingratiated itself with) are actually firearms precursor parts designed to facilitate the unlicensed manufafture of unserialized firearms under California law, and are thus illegal to possess in the state. They want $2,500 from Polymaker for each day they marketed such spools, of which there are several, and said spools have existed for years in some cases, potentially leaving Polymaker on the hook for millions


View attachment 9719200


View attachment 9719189

The CADOJ also considers a featureless block of aluminum to be a firearms precursor part specifically because it is marketed as one, despite being indistinguishable from any other block of aluminum of the same size
View attachment 9719196

Lawsuit
Click to expand...
They did the old joke about the ATF declaring a block of aluminum a firearm back when they were gunning for the """"ghost gun""" 80% uppers. California does it again!
 
AGPinochet said:
San Diego County has sued 3D Printer filament manufacturer Polymaker, They are arguing that certain spools of 3D Printer filament, specifically those sold and marketed as "Creator Spools" (that is, those spools with the branding and association of various figures and content creators in the 3D printed gun sphere that Polymaker has ingratiated itself with) are actually firearms precursor parts designed to facilitate the unlicensed manufafture of unserialized firearms under California law, and are thus illegal to possess in the state.
Click to expand...
I am suing US Steel because its bars have been milled into gun barrels!
 
AGPinochet said:
San Diego County has sued 3D Printer filament manufacturer Polymaker, They are arguing that certain spools of 3D Printer filament, specifically those sold and marketed as "Creator Spools" (that is, those spools with the branding and association of various figures and content creators in the 3D printed gun sphere that Polymaker has ingratiated itself with) are actually firearms precursor parts designed to facilitate the unlicensed manufafture of unserialized firearms under California law, and are thus illegal to possess in the state. They want $2,500 from Polymaker for each day they marketed such spools, of which there are several, and said spools have existed for years in some cases, potentially leaving Polymaker on the hook for millions


View attachment 9719200


View attachment 9719189

The CADOJ also considers a featureless block of aluminum to be a firearms precursor part specifically because it is marketed as one, despite being indistinguishable from any other block of aluminum of the same size
View attachment 9719196

Lawsuit
Click to expand...

I would have sworn a year ago their marketing imagery for Army Green, FDE, Black, and Blue-Green used to have foregrips or something. Now its all just clamps and figurines.

1792172768855.png

Edit: OK LOL

1792173756524.png

Edit 2: That 2nd image is actually in the complaint.
 
Last edited:
Falcos_Commisar said:
My FFL is freaking out and refusing to not do Form 4s. I understand he's younger and has a wife and a house and doesn't want ATF rape under a Dem administration..... So I'll get my suppressors and sbrs elsewhere
Click to expand...
What's the downside to also getting a Form 4? They already know who you are and what you bought from the 4473.
 
Parodius20XX said:
So apparently anything is a gun precursor part if someone says it is? Someone should slap a sign that says gun parts on the pipe section of Home Depot.
Click to expand...

If you live in a Blue shithole and have some pipe, band clamps, some blocks of wood, some springs, some screws, a nail, and a rubber band, they'll get you with intent to manufacture and sell illegal weapons. Because clearly you're going to start making and selling ZipGuns.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom