Meeting Your Needs Through Polyamory

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Romantic relationships are essential to a healthy lifestyle because they help us meet key psychological needs. Foremost among these, according to York University (Toronto) psychologist Rhonda Balzarini and her colleagues, are eroticism and nurturance.

Eroticism refers to the bodily pleasure of sexual activity. Although the original function of sex is reproduction, in humans it has taken on a much deeper psychological meaning. For us, sex is a social act, a means of connecting on an intimate level with another human being.


In contrast, nurturance refers to the feelings of warmth and closeness that develop when two individuals share a significant portion of their lives together. We need to know there’s someone we can always turn to, someone who’s got our back. Having a significant other in our life is what gives us the strength and courage to go out and face an uncertain world.


In twenty-first century Western society, the only generally accepted route to meeting our eroticism and nurturance needs is through a committed monogamous relationship. We’re led to believe we’ll live happily ever after once we find the soulmate who will fulfill all our needs—despite the fact that nearly half of all marriages end in divorce. We’re also led to believe that life-long monogamy is the natural state for humans—even though evidence from other cultures and time periods shows us this clearly isn’t so.


The Polyamorist Lifestyle​

In recent decades, there’s been much discussion of an alternate form of romantic relationship known as polyamory. At the core of a polyamorous relationship is a primary couple, typically a husband and wife. Yet, unlike a monogamous couple, the partners are allowed to have other sexually or emotionally intimate relationships. In other words, polyamory is a form of consensual non-monogamy, or “open marriage.”


The received wisdom—among both psychologists and the lay public alike—is that polyamorous relationships can’t possibly be as satisfying as monogamous ones. Feelings of jealousy will be unavoidable, detractors argue. And the focus on sex rather than loving companionship supposedly makes polyamorous relationships shallow and unfulfilling. Some even argue that polyamory is nothing more than a scheme for men to gain sexual variety at the expense of their wives, whom they’ve emotionally abandoned.


In response, polyamorists maintain that their lifestyle is uniquely fulfilling, despite the bad rap. Feelings of jealousy can be controlled through open communication and the cultivation of an emotion known as “compersion,” that is, happiness in knowing that your partner is happy. Polyamorists also insist that they experience higher levels of both eroticism and nurturance because they rely on different partners to meet each of these needs.


To test the notion that polyamory provides greater levels of both eroticism and nurturance than monogamous relationships do, Balzarini and colleagues conducted a series of surveys that targeted individuals in mono and poly relationships. Their findings provide interesting insights into the dynamics of both monogamy and polyamory.


The Dynamics of a Monogamous Relationship​

Romantic relationships help us meet our needs for eroticism and nurturance, but they don’t always provide these in equal amounts, or at the same time. Typically, romantic couples experience high levels of eroticism early in the relationship. They have a strong desire for sex with their partner, and it’s this passion that drives the couple together and binds them.


Within a couple of years, however, sexual passion begins to diminish as the couple develop an attachment bond. Attachment is a sense of connectedness built out of trust rather than passion. We know our partner will be there for us when we need them, and that knowledge gives us the strength to go out and meet the challenges the world sets before us.


Passion is driven by mystery, while attachment is built on familiarity. Thus, the better we know our partner, the less we desire to have sex with them. At the same time, our lover has become our best friend, the most important person in our world. The key to a happy marriage is balancing mystery and familiarity so that we meet our eroticism and nurturance needs—but that’s easier said than done.


When the passion has fizzled in your marriage, there’s always the temptation to abandon it for a new erotic relationship. In fact, some people do pursue serial monogamous relationships, mistaking eroticism alone for love and not taking into account the nurturance needs that can only be fully met in a well-established relationship.


Outsourcing Unmet Needs to a Different Partner​

Polyamorists face this same problem that monogamists do in their primary relationship. But rather than abandoning their spouse for a fresh face, they outsource their unmet erotic needs to a different partner. Recognizing that the flames of passion are now little more than glowing embers, both partners can take on new lovers, all the while maintaining the deep attachment of the primary relationship that provides much needed nurturance.


In their research, Balzarini and colleagues found evidence to support the polyamorist position, particularly in terms of meeting eroticism and nurturance needs. They found that the monogamists in their study reported generally high levels of both eroticism and nurturance. However, when these were compared to reports of polyamorists' primary and secondary relationships, interesting patterns emerged.


Regarding eroticism, polyamorists reported lower levels in their primary relationship, but higher levels in their secondary relationship, compared with the sole relationship of monogamists. And when it came to nurturance, the pattern was reversed. That is, polyamorists reported higher levels of nurturance in their primary relationship, but lower levels in their secondary relationship, compared with the sole relationship of monogamists.


Figure reconstructed from Balzarini et al. (2019) by D. Ludden

Eroticism and Nurturance in Monogamy and Polyamory
Source: Figure reconstructed from Balzarini et al. (2019) by D. Ludden


These patterns were just what we would expect to see if polyamorists were outsourcing their erotic needs to their secondary partner, as they have argued. This outsourcing also frees up the primary partner to provide more of what they do best—nurturance. In this way, polyamorists get the more of their relationship needs met, and met more fully, than monogamists do.


Polyamory is definitely not a lifestyle that suits all persons. It requires strong communication skills—since nothing is kept secret—and polyamorists also need to be able to control feelings of jealousy. But for those who can make it work, it’s a lifestyle that offers immense benefits for both partners.
 
I'm not even going to waste my time reading this. I already know where it is going from the title and some skimming. Women are wired to find the best mate to produce her offspring. Men are wired to find suitable women to produce their offspring and lock them down and fight over them. If you are giving your women to other men you don't deserve to have your genes pass on. I don't fault the woman for looking for other suiters. It's in her nature. You try to lock her down and if you can't you find one you can. That's nature.
 
This is the communism of sex (and no, not because she's "our girlfriend"). Its because it sounds great in theory but it's an absolute disaster in practice. You and your partner will never acquire interested third parties at an equal rate or of equal value. And if your wife is getting railed by her third black dick of the night while you desperately try to convince another girl on Tinder that 5'6" really isnt that short in person before she blocks you, you aren't going to be feeling "compersion". You are going to be jealous. .
 
How the fuck do these people have time for multiple relationships? Between work and family I have a bit of leisure time to chill out but a whole other relationship on top of it with all of the attendant hassles? How would I have time for friends or hobbies?
 
Anyone know or remember the term "going steady"?

It's probably an antiquated term that's fallen out of use because everyone does the relationship cycle backwards or out of order. There's nothing wrong (per-se) with dating multiple people, the difference is, sex wasn't so easy. You dated, found someone you wanted to invest time and effort in, and then you went steady, or exclusive, whatever you want to call it. You were dedicating your time and effort exclusively to them, which could lead to a successful relationship and eventual family. Now-a-days with free love, everything good got polluted by a bunch of low trust and low self-control coomers. It's not wonder so many people are trying the poly thing; people jump into bed so fucking fast the girl doesn't even vet if the guy would be a good choice and the guy can have a half-dozen girls on the side who are all ready and willing.

Edit: Fuck I'm a boomer...
 
How the fuck do these people have time for multiple relationships? Between work and family I have a bit of leisure time to chill out but a whole other relationship on top of it with all of the attendant hassles? How would I have time for friends or hobbies?
Aren't most polyamorous relationships a lazy, fat, ugly woman and multiple soycucks? I assume they pay for the fatty to be lazy and fat while the soycucks get the illusion they have a relationship.
 
Dude just fuck whoever and stop pretending it's about love, simple as.
Don't cheapen an already cheap whore by pretending it's another, slightly cleaner whore.
 
This is the communism of sex (and no, not because she's "our girlfriend"). Its because it sounds great in theory but it's an absolute disaster in practice. You and your partner will never acquire interested third parties at an equal rate or of equal value. And if your wife is getting railed by her third black dick of the night while you desperately try to convince another girl on Tinder that 5'6" really isnt that short in person before she blocks you, you aren't going to be feeling "compersion". You are going to be jealous. .
I remember reading an old Reddit post about a guy complaining about him wanting to start an open relationship so he could have sex with other women. He ended up having to pressure his girlfriend into doing it, and by her tenth lay in 2 weeks, he started to realize with his 0 scores that it wasn't going to plan and started asking whatever subreddit he was in for advice on how to end the relationship.
 
This does not work and you're never going to get what you want (which be honest is just sex). People want companionship to help them shoulder their life and sex, that's fine, we all do, but complicating your life to get it is fucking dumber than trying to find one person that can do both and you're willing to live with them. These people remind me of my first ex who tried this shit with me until I walked out on her.
 
Lol nobody sane is convinced by this shit, that's why the people espousing this lifestyle are always one of two archetypes
1. Dead eyed 30 somethings that have features that would usually be considered conventially attractive yet somehow still don't fit together
2. Fat soy infused redditors where you have a hard time figuring out which of them has a (real and not surgically constructed nightmare) pussy

TL;DR lmao nigga this shit wack u a cuckold
 
Polyamory is degenrate scum and the fact that my browser's spellchecker even knew the word is pathetic and sickening. Fuck these people. Damn them to hell. Their relationships never work and they only bring pain and suffering to the people around them. Fuck polyams. DEGENERATE MADE-UP SCUM THAT LEECH OFF OF USEFUL PEOPLE.
 
Protip: Convince your mate to dress up and do more foreplay to keep shit exciting and to keep her sexy in vogue. Because if you fail at that in your love life, well, you are a fucking infidel.
 
Passion is driven by mystery, while attachment is built on familiarity. Thus, the better we know our partner, the less we desire to have sex with them.

This is so very, very wrong. Anyone who thinks this is true is both bad at sex and a bad person.
 
Polyamory is degenrate scum and the fact that my browser's spellchecker even knew the word is pathetic and sickening. Fuck these people. Damn them to hell. Their relationships never work and they only bring pain and suffering to the people around them. Fuck polyams. DEGENERATE MADE-UP SCUM THAT LEECH OFF OF USEFUL PEOPLE.
Wowza. Have you tried having sex?
 
Back
Top Bottom