I'm not gonna lie, this man is an absolute degenerate and a spreg, but he also isn't exactly wrong about most of the stuff he says. I think he reads his own thoughts onto others a tad much, but other than that I have yet to hear him actually say something untrue. He was right about cuties, I mean it's not really a good thing that that's the thoughts you were intended to have watching that movie, nor is it a good thing that he had those thoughts watching the movie, but "child is hot" is honest to God one of that movie's themes. He's right about the bit about consent too. It's a somewhat radical interpretation, but it's also completely right. Consent is a legal concept, there is no metaphysical consentness you can measure, no more than there is a magic way to truly determine what property is whose. We can have rules concerning it, and we can follow those rules to try and avoid issues, but since it's not in any way a fundamental concept you'll always have grey areas just like you might have some strange property inheritance you can't quite figure out occasionally. The fact that what he says is seeming vile doesn't actually negate it. Even that hur dur pedophile bad video, despite the fact it shows him to be an absolute degenerate, is fundamentally correct in its assertations. I'll admit his personal behavior is laughable but he's actually kinda based in a weird, Max Stirnery kind of way. He just wants to get rid of the spook, and sure he may be a degenerate, but it's also kinda hard to argue against him in any way other than that ad hominin. You could just say "he's a pedophile, pedophile bad," which, fair enough, is an understandable sentiment, but at the same time, he is also right that there's no real good reason to intrinsically hate a pedophile who stops himself from raping children other than from some personal disgust. He's a strange, strange man, but he's also mostly correct.
