🌟 Internet Famous Max Karson / mrgirl - Pedophile pseudo-intellectual, master/suicide baiter, school shooter white-knight

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Meowthkip said:
Also, his definitions of what it is sexual abuse and what isn't are so fucking warped that it's hard to take him claiming anything like that seriously.

This is a man who says he was abused by not being allowed to watch movies with rape scenes as a kid and that feeling obliged to give sexual partners orgasms is abuse.
Click to expand...
I thought Nick Bat and Amos Yee were just joking too. You saw what happened with them.
 
Therealhomor said:
I thought Nick Bat and Amos Yee were just joking too. You saw what happened with them.
Click to expand...

I never said he was joking. I definitely think he wants us to believe he's joking because having the line between truth and fiction is very convenient for him, and also I think there's a level of delusion going on as well.
 
Meowthkip said:
Also, his definitions of what it is sexual abuse and what isn't are so fucking warped that it's hard to take him claiming anything like that seriously.

This is a man who says he was abused by not being allowed to watch movies with rape scenes as a kid and that feeling obliged to give sexual partners orgasms is abuse.
Click to expand...
In the Deadwing Dork video, just before claiming he was sexually abused, he listed things such as having 'The Talk' with your kids as sexual abuse, which means that by his logic, every child on Earth has been abused except for those whose parents are super hardcore repressed fundies that never tell them where babies come from.
 
I didn't think it was possible for someone to project harder than Freud but MrGirl's existence proves me wrong.
 
I'm not gonna lie, this man is an absolute degenerate and a spreg, but he also isn't exactly wrong about most of the stuff he says. I think he reads his own thoughts onto others a tad much, but other than that I have yet to hear him actually say something untrue. He was right about cuties, I mean it's not really a good thing that that's the thoughts you were intended to have watching that movie, nor is it a good thing that he had those thoughts watching the movie, but "child is hot" is honest to God one of that movie's themes. He's right about the bit about consent too. It's a somewhat radical interpretation, but it's also completely right. Consent is a legal concept, there is no metaphysical consentness you can measure, no more than there is a magic way to truly determine what property is whose. We can have rules concerning it, and we can follow those rules to try and avoid issues, but since it's not in any way a fundamental concept you'll always have grey areas just like you might have some strange property inheritance you can't quite figure out occasionally. The fact that what he says is seeming vile doesn't actually negate it. Even that hur dur pedophile bad video, despite the fact it shows him to be an absolute degenerate, is fundamentally correct in its assertations. I'll admit his personal behavior is laughable but he's actually kinda based in a weird, Max Stirnery kind of way. He just wants to get rid of the spook, and sure he may be a degenerate, but it's also kinda hard to argue against him in any way other than that ad hominin. You could just say "he's a pedophile, pedophile bad," which, fair enough, is an understandable sentiment, but at the same time, he is also right that there's no real good reason to intrinsically hate a pedophile who stops himself from raping children other than from some personal disgust. He's a strange, strange man, but he's also mostly correct.
 
Sniggez said:
I'm not gonna lie, this man is an absolute degenerate and a spreg, but he also isn't exactly wrong about most of the stuff he says. I think he reads his own thoughts onto others a tad much, but other than that I have yet to hear him actually say something untrue. He was right about cuties, I mean it's not really a good thing that that's the thoughts you were intended to have watching that movie, nor is it a good thing that he had those thoughts watching the movie, but "child is hot" is honest to God one of that movie's themes. He's right about the bit about consent too. It's a somewhat radical interpretation, but it's also completely right. Consent is a legal concept, there is no metaphysical consentness you can measure, no more than there is a magic way to truly determine what property is whose. We can have rules concerning it, and we can follow those rules to try and avoid issues, but since it's not in any way a fundamental concept you'll always have grey areas just like you might have some strange property inheritance you can't quite figure out occasionally. The fact that what he says is seeming vile doesn't actually negate it. Even that hur dur pedophile bad video, despite the fact it shows him to be an absolute degenerate, is fundamentally correct in its assertations. I'll admit his personal behavior is laughable but he's actually kinda based in a weird, Max Stirnery kind of way. He just wants to get rid of the spook, and sure he may be a degenerate, but it's also kinda hard to argue against him in any way other than that ad hominin. You could just say "he's a pedophile, pedophile bad," which, fair enough, is an understandable sentiment, but at the same time, he is also right that there's no real good reason to intrinsically hate a pedophile who stops himself from raping children other than from some personal disgust. He's a strange, strange man, but he's also mostly correct.
Click to expand...
Can't wait for this post to age badly.
 
Sniggez said:
I'm not gonna lie, this man is an absolute degenerate and a spreg, but he also isn't exactly wrong about most of the stuff he says. I think he reads his own thoughts onto others a tad much, but other than that I have yet to hear him actually say something untrue. He was right about cuties, I mean it's not really a good thing that that's the thoughts you were intended to have watching that movie, nor is it a good thing that he had those thoughts watching the movie, but "child is hot" is honest to God one of that movie's themes. He's right about the bit about consent too. It's a somewhat radical interpretation, but it's also completely right. Consent is a legal concept, there is no metaphysical consentness you can measure, no more than there is a magic way to truly determine what property is whose. We can have rules concerning it, and we can follow those rules to try and avoid issues, but since it's not in any way a fundamental concept you'll always have grey areas just like you might have some strange property inheritance you can't quite figure out occasionally. The fact that what he says is seeming vile doesn't actually negate it. Even that hur dur pedophile bad video, despite the fact it shows him to be an absolute degenerate, is fundamentally correct in its assertations. I'll admit his personal behavior is laughable but he's actually kinda based in a weird, Max Stirnery kind of way. He just wants to get rid of the spook, and sure he may be a degenerate, but it's also kinda hard to argue against him in any way other than that ad hominin. You could just say "he's a pedophile, pedophile bad," which, fair enough, is an understandable sentiment, but at the same time, he is also right that there's no real good reason to intrinsically hate a pedophile who stops himself from raping children other than from some personal disgust. He's a strange, strange man, but he's also mostly correct.
Click to expand...
Ok groomer.
 
Sniggez said:
I'm not gonna lie, this man is an absolute degenerate and a spreg, but he also isn't exactly wrong about most of the stuff he says. I think he reads his own thoughts onto others a tad much, but other than that I have yet to hear him actually say something untrue. He was right about cuties, I mean it's not really a good thing that that's the thoughts you were intended to have watching that movie, nor is it a good thing that he had those thoughts watching the movie, but "child is hot" is honest to God one of that movie's themes. He's right about the bit about consent too. It's a somewhat radical interpretation, but it's also completely right. Consent is a legal concept, there is no metaphysical consentness you can measure, no more than there is a magic way to truly determine what property is whose. We can have rules concerning it, and we can follow those rules to try and avoid issues, but since it's not in any way a fundamental concept you'll always have grey areas just like you might have some strange property inheritance you can't quite figure out occasionally. The fact that what he says is seeming vile doesn't actually negate it. Even that hur dur pedophile bad video, despite the fact it shows him to be an absolute degenerate, is fundamentally correct in its assertations. I'll admit his personal behavior is laughable but he's actually kinda based in a weird, Max Stirnery kind of way. He just wants to get rid of the spook, and sure he may be a degenerate, but it's also kinda hard to argue against him in any way other than that ad hominin. You could just say "he's a pedophile, pedophile bad," which, fair enough, is an understandable sentiment, but at the same time, he is also right that there's no real good reason to intrinsically hate a pedophile who stops himself from raping children other than from some personal disgust. He's a strange, strange man, but he's also mostly correct.
Click to expand...
Oh shit! STRANGER DANGER!
 
Sniggez said:
I'm not gonna lie, this man is an absolute degenerate and a spreg, but he also isn't exactly wrong about most of the stuff he says. I think he reads his own thoughts onto others a tad much, but other than that I have yet to hear him actually say something untrue. He was right about cuties, I mean it's not really a good thing that that's the thoughts you were intended to have watching that movie, nor is it a good thing that he had those thoughts watching the movie, but "child is hot" is honest to God one of that movie's themes. He's right about the bit about consent too. It's a somewhat radical interpretation, but it's also completely right. Consent is a legal concept, there is no metaphysical consentness you can measure, no more than there is a magic way to truly determine what property is whose. We can have rules concerning it, and we can follow those rules to try and avoid issues, but since it's not in any way a fundamental concept you'll always have grey areas just like you might have some strange property inheritance you can't quite figure out occasionally. The fact that what he says is seeming vile doesn't actually negate it. Even that hur dur pedophile bad video, despite the fact it shows him to be an absolute degenerate, is fundamentally correct in its assertations. I'll admit his personal behavior is laughable but he's actually kinda based in a weird, Max Stirnery kind of way. He just wants to get rid of the spook, and sure he may be a degenerate, but it's also kinda hard to argue against him in any way other than that ad hominin. You could just say "he's a pedophile, pedophile bad," which, fair enough, is an understandable sentiment, but at the same time, he is also right that there's no real good reason to intrinsically hate a pedophile who stops himself from raping children other than from some personal disgust. He's a strange, strange man, but he's also mostly correct.
Click to expand...
Dude WHAT?
 
Sniggez said:
I'm not gonna lie, this man is an absolute degenerate and a spreg, but he also isn't exactly wrong about most of the stuff he says. I think he reads his own thoughts onto others a tad much, but other than that I have yet to hear him actually say something untrue. He was right about cuties, I mean it's not really a good thing that that's the thoughts you were intended to have watching that movie, nor is it a good thing that he had those thoughts watching the movie, but "child is hot" is honest to God one of that movie's themes. He's right about the bit about consent too. It's a somewhat radical interpretation, but it's also completely right. Consent is a legal concept, there is no metaphysical consentness you can measure, no more than there is a magic way to truly determine what property is whose. We can have rules concerning it, and we can follow those rules to try and avoid issues, but since it's not in any way a fundamental concept you'll always have grey areas just like you might have some strange property inheritance you can't quite figure out occasionally. The fact that what he says is seeming vile doesn't actually negate it. Even that hur dur pedophile bad video, despite the fact it shows him to be an absolute degenerate, is fundamentally correct in its assertations. I'll admit his personal behavior is laughable but he's actually kinda based in a weird, Max Stirnery kind of way. He just wants to get rid of the spook, and sure he may be a degenerate, but it's also kinda hard to argue against him in any way other than that ad hominin. You could just say "he's a pedophile, pedophile bad," which, fair enough, is an understandable sentiment, but at the same time, he is also right that there's no real good reason to intrinsically hate a pedophile who stops himself from raping children other than from some personal disgust. He's a strange, strange man, but he's also mostly correct.
Click to expand...

Sorry, time to get suplexed into the dildo dimension
 
Vito still defends on of the biggest creeps on YT
1603224601532.png
1603224699145.png

1603224855766.png
 
Meowthkip said:
Also, his definitions of what it is sexual abuse and what isn't are so fucking warped that it's hard to take him claiming anything like that seriously.

This is a man who says he was abused by not being allowed to watch movies with rape scenes as a kid and that feeling obliged to give sexual partners orgasms is abuse.
Click to expand...
His video about how his lesbian mom and her lesbian gf treated him and his brother makes me think that his childhood did involve a real amount of gender based abuse that fucked with his head.

Not that we should feel bad for him, but he's a great example to point to for why man hating dykes shouldn't be allowed to interact with little boys, much less raise them.
 
Bob Barker said:
His video about how his lesbian mom and her lesbian gf treated him and his brother makes me think that his childhood did involve a real amount of gender based abuse that fucked with his head.

Not that we should feel bad for him, but he's a great example to point to for why man hating dykes shouldn't be allowed to interact with little boys, much less raise them.
Click to expand...
This seems weird. While this can indeed fuck a guys head up it would seem like it would more likely create a stereotypical "I love being a manly man" type over a living embodiment of the creepy male feminist trope.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom