MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
An Ounce of Vagina said:
And this is why the so-called liberal elite shake their heads at the rurals pining for the good old days. It is never coming back. The economic, demographic, and social factors have shifted irrevocably. For all the good it does they might as well be hoping feudalism makes a comeback.

I can understand someone looking back to the past with rose colored glasses. But when you get to the point when you idealize the past so much that you turn your back on the future because it's not like the past you're only setting yourself up for heartache.

I know this is a simplification, but a good analogy would be certain areas of the Middle East. Many of these places idealize the past and reject the present, and the only future they seem to want is for the past to come back. And what has happened to these places? They have stagnated and been left behind by the more future-focused western nations. Meanwhile other Middle Eastern countries like Kuwait and cities like Dubai are emerging powers because while they may look to the past in some ways they haven't shut out the future.

You can wish it weren't so all you like, but the world won't stop for you.
Click to expand...

Personally speaking I want these rural areas not to be forgotten, but there really isn't an easy solution for them. The country and by extension the world is changing rapidly and unfortunately rural areas area usually the hardest to adapt (not just in the USA either).
 
The Great Goatse said:
The problem with rural areas is that pretty much the only major industry there is food production, and all of the food production for the entire country could be done by less half a million people (and I'm being generous there). The jobs are gone from rural areas and they're not coming back, because the US is a service economy now and you can't get service economy jobs in areas below a certain critical mass in population. It just doesn't make economic sense to have rural areas anymore-- unless you have guaranteed basic income and guaranteed health coverage, a "socialist" policy that the people in those areas don't support.

We're never seeing a 1940s-60s style boom in this country again. Even if manufacturing jobs came back, what used to take a factory of 10,000 men can now be done by 150 due to automation. A farm that required 500 farmhands can now be serviced by 100. This is a major structural problem with the economy and one that neither party seems to have an answer to. To sustain a nation like the United States, it used to take the labor of the entire United States. It no longer does. There just are not enough jobs for people. It doesn't matter if we are "losing on trade" (we aren't) or if can force air conditioner factories to open in the US. The person taking your job isn't Jose or Chan, it's XT-087B-4Y.

Rural people would happily work for much less than city wages, since they don't have to pay city rents or city prices. Why aren't major companies moving there? It's not lack of people willing to work. It's lack of jobs. Big cities provide jobs for hire receptionists, and administrative assistants, and PCAs, and all kinds of people who just can't do that kind of work in the rural areas because the jobs don't exist there.

It's heartbreaking and it is a major cultural loss for the United States, but it's not something one group of people is doing to another. Unless we can get past the idea that everyone must work an arbitrary amount in order to deserve the basic necessities of life, rural areas are going to continue to wither and die.
Click to expand...

And so it is that we have touched on the role of automation in today's economic situation.

Automation like what we have today (much less the proliferation of it) was simply never envisioned when capitalism was first laid out as an economic doctrine.
 
Pikimon said:
Personally speaking I want these rural areas not to be forgotten, but there really isn't an easy solution for them. The country and by extension the world is changing rapidly and unfortunately rural areas area usually the hardest to adapt (not just in the USA either).
Click to expand...
Turn them into golf courses. Really, really beautiful courses.
 
I like that conservatives put themselves below the "liberal elite"all the time. We get it. You're dumb. You don't have to put yourselves down like this. I'm sure there are elitist corporation owners that live in Texas and Oklahoma. Look no further then Trump.
Doesn't make inner city liberals life any better, or anyone that is left leaning for that matter.

But somehow these people delude themselves into thinking only the liberal minority are being played by their party. I'm sure Trump and the right really have middle Americas interest at heart...
 
Disgusted Face Hold said:
http://gotnews.com/breaking-nytimes-trump-accuser-jessicaleeds-confirmed-liar-cnn-airplane-details/

Hate to put this entire thread on suicide watch but someone's gotta do it! :sighduck:
Click to expand...
Hm.
pm57cGG.jpg

I don't think I trust this "gotnews" to be a fair and impartial judge.

But hey, there's an easy way to settle this. Trump already told the Times to retract, and they already told him to blow it out his ass. Why doesn't he sue them? Then this can all come out in discovery and we can settle it once and for all.
 
Trump could easily Hulk Hogan-ize the Times on his own, but that would be rather tedious, considering he already laid out his intentions on revamping libel laws so that every normie can easily Gawker-up every media mouthpiece in existence.
 
melty said:
Did @Internet War Criminal come up with this title too?

Anyway I have an anecdote. I was driving around portland and I saw a pro hillary sign.
I realized at that point i've seen like, zero pro hillary signs. To be fair, I don't drive very often but I think I've seen more trump signs almost?
Click to expand...
Same here, when driving in rural areas I tend to see more signs campaigning for Trump instead of Hillary ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Disgusted Face Hold said:
Trump could easily Hulk Hogan-ize the Times on his own, but that would be rather tedious, considering he already laid out his intentions on revamping libel laws so that every normie can easily Gawker-up every media mouthpiece in existence.
Click to expand...

Except that the New York Times is a hundred year old newspaper with dozens of lawyers on retainer for exactly this kind of thing. They're relying on Trump's ability to be easily baited to go to court and discover juicy tidbits about his life in the discovery.

Trump has everything to lose by suing the New York Times as it makes him look like a whiny thin-skinned bitch who can't take the usual political mudslinging every other politician has to go through.

KingGeedorah said:
I feel like most Hillary supports don't own front lawns. They live in houses like this
Click to expand...

To be fair I really doubt that most Hillary supporters are that comfortable putting up a Clinton sign if they're surrounded by Trump signs.

These are the same people who have promised to "exert their second amendment rights" at polling places.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...-monitoring-polls-alarms-voting-rights-groups
 
Disgusted Face Hold said:
Trump could easily Hulk Hogan-ize the Times on his own, but that would be rather tedious, considering he already laid out his intentions on revamping libel laws so that every normie can easily Gawker-up every media mouthpiece in existence.
Click to expand...

No he can't. The man has never won a libel suit. In fact, he even sued a guy (Tim O'Brien) for saying he was a fake billionaire and all he had to do to get the case to court was prove he actually was. He couldn't even prove he was a billionaire because he's a fat lying sack of shit and the case was laughed out of court.
 
So what exactly is going on with all of this Donald Trump business with the ladies accusing him and all that? Do you buy this baloney? I sure don't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom