MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
Brandobaris said:
Arrest people when they commit the crime... So you want an officer following every person in the country waiting fo them to fuck up? Or is it more a Minority Report deal you are going for?
Click to expand...

You can't be this dense...

Anyways back to the election apocalypse between Lizard Lady and Orangutan Man, here is some context on the recent CNN poll.

Make sure to pay attention to the sample size.
E7odZ2l.png


So while the race is tightening, I would advise caution for both sides (don't celebrate a Trump/Clinton victory prematurely) as this election is rather insane and the debates will be a major decider for undecided voters and those who are only hardheartedly supporting Trump/Clinton.
 
Pikimon said:
You can't be this dense...

Anyways back to the election apocalypse between Lizard Lady and Orangutan Man, here is some context on the recent CNN poll.

Make sure to pay attention to the sample size.
E7odZ2l.png


So while the race is tightening, I would advise caution for both sides (don't celebrate a Trump/Clinton victory prematurely) as this election is rather insane and the debates will be a major decider for undecided voters and those who are only hardheartedly supporting Trump/Clinton.
Click to expand...

Barring something massive, this is going to be a very, very close election. Think the Brexit vote in June.
 
Pikimon said:
So while the race is tightening, I would advise caution for both sides (don't celebrate a Trump/Clinton victory prematurely) as this election is rather insane and the debates will be a major decider for undecided voters and those who are only hardheartedly supporting Trump/Clinton.
Click to expand...

Oh good you'd better put out a press release because both campaigns are waiting for your public statement. wow

Barackobama.JPG
 
Jon-Kacho said:
An ounce of prevention and all, though.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't call racial profiling "prevention" as much as an "ineffective violation of the constitution"

For example the "Guidance Regarding the Use of Race By Federal Law Enforcement Agencies" that was issued by the U.S. Department of Justice in 2003 states:

"Racial profiling" at its core concerns the invidious use of race or ethnicity as a criterion in conducting stops, searches and other law enforcement investigative procedures. It is premised on the erroneous assumption that any particular individual of one race or ethnicity is more likely to engage in misconduct than any particular individual of another race or ethnicity.

Racial profiling in law enforcement is not merely wrong, but also ineffective. Race-based assumptions in law enforcement perpetuate negative racial stereotypes that are harmful to our rich and diverse democracy, and materially impair our efforts to maintain a fair and just society.

Source: http://www.civilrights.org/publicat...-racial.html?referrer=https://www.google.com/
 
Pikimon said:
I wouldn't call racial profiling "prevention" as much as an "ineffective violation of the constitution"
Click to expand...

I wasn't really concerned whether it was considered racism or not, I was interested in whether it was effective or not at stopping or preventing crime, that's all I cared about, but apparently due to the studies I've been reading, it seems it's not the case. Looks like I'm an out of date Dinosaur : P

Racial profiling is a form of stereotype-based discrimination. Stereotypes are beliefs people have about the traits (like criminality) that are typically possessed by members of particular groups. Like all beliefs, stereotypes can vary in how accurate they are, perhaps based on the thoroughness, objectivity, and representativeness of the information one has about the groups. Nevertheless, decades of psychological research have shown that there are many mechanisms by which perceptions of groups can become distorted regardless of the quality of the information [e.g., Hamilton & Gifford, 1976; Mackie, Hamilton, Susskind, & Rosselli, 1996]. Furthermore, stereotypes have been shown to be resistant to change, even in the presence of contradictory evidence [e.g., Kunda & Oleson, 1995; Rothbart & John, 1985; Weber & Crocker, 1983], and indeed to bolster themselves through self-fulfilling prophecies [Jussim & Fleming, 1996].

Consequently, stereotypes have a tendency to have compromised accuracy. Compounding this problem is the reality that, on virtually every measurable dimension, human categories (e.g., race, ethnic, gender) have more variability within than between their groups [e.g., Barbujani, Magagni, Minch, Cavalli-Sforza, 1997; Rosenberg, Pritchard, Weber, Cann, Kidd, Zhivotovsky, & Feldman, 2002]. As a consequence, even when stereotypes may reflect a “kernel of truth” (i.e., a real difference), using a stereotype based on a group average is probably a crude strategy for making a prediction about an individual member of that group. The relevance here to racial profiling is clear. Beliefs that people have about race/ethnicity and criminality are probably skewed by a lack of access to representative information, various cognitive biases, and resistance to change. Law enforcement agents are not Effect of Racial Profiling 31 immune to these biases, and there is no evidence indicating that racial profiles used by law enforcement are based on any systematic, empirical analysis of representative data. Even judicially permissible race-neutral criminal profiles are based on “informal” criteria, as acknowledged repeatedly by the U. S. Supreme Court [e.g., Reid v. Georgia, 448 U.S. 438 (1980)].

Consequently, using stereotypes about race/ethnicity and criminality to try to predict which individuals are likely to be carrying drugs or weapons is, from a social psychological perspective, a problematic strategy. As is depicted in Figures 3 and 4, the model predicts that the longer racial profiling is practiced, the more the returns diminish. However, it is unlikely that such diminishing returns will be noticed, and profiling practices adjusted accordingly, because incarceration rates for the profiled groups will remain high, thereby further supporting the stereotype and rationalizing the practice. Police and the public are also unlikely to notice that decreasing numbers of minorities who are stopped are guilty, not to mention that, as in New York City, fewer minorities than majority group members who were stopped were arrested. Here again, the New York City study is illuminating because the higher arrest rates for Whites who were stopped did not appear to alter police stereotypes and practices. Similarly, studies of racial disparities in U.S. Customs searches have found that those groups typically targeted are not most likely to be found carrying contraband [e.g., Ahmed & Rezmovic, 2001].
 
Pikimon said:
I wouldn't call racial profiling "prevention" as much as an "ineffective violation of the constitution"

For example the "Guidance Regarding the Use of Race By Federal Law Enforcement Agencies" that was issued by the U.S. Department of Justice in 2003 states:

"Racial profiling" at its core concerns the invidious use of race or ethnicity as a criterion in conducting stops, searches and other law enforcement investigative procedures. It is premised on the erroneous assumption that any particular individual of one race or ethnicity is more likely to engage in misconduct than any particular individual of another race or ethnicity.

Racial profiling in law enforcement is not merely wrong, but also ineffective. Race-based assumptions in law enforcement perpetuate negative racial stereotypes that are harmful to our rich and diverse democracy, and materially impair our efforts to maintain a fair and just society.

Source: http://www.civilrights.org/publicat...-racial.html?referrer=https://www.google.com/
Click to expand...
as a spic, I can comfirm that the darker and poorer the spic, the more likely he's a criminal. this is especially if they're teens. fuck cholos, they're the reason I'm labeled a malinchist.
 
The Clinton health rumors are the same sort of desperate wishful thinking behind the birthers minus the racism. It offers the comforting idea that the person they hate isn't really going to be president, they're going to be arrested and executed for treason or fall over dead any moment now.

I can't find it now, but just before and right after the 2008 election there was this site where people who believed pretty much every Obama conspiracy theory gathered to wail and gnash their teeth as they waited for the UN stormtroopers to come take their guns, forcibly convert them to Islam, and make them gay. Some of them would write up fake indictments against Obama for treason or whatever, and the others would say they were praying over them night and day in the hope that God would make them real.

I see the same desperate magical thinking going on today. People who believe and spread these rumors want to believe them because it offers a way out from a reality they cannot accept. It lets them feel like they're in control and live in a just world where evil (in their definition) always loses. It also gives them the conspiracy-theorist's high of being so much smarter than the sheeple and knowing what's "really going on".
 
Last edited:
Can I suggest making a racial profiling topic in deep thoughts, it's interesting but it's getting kind off topic here
 
An Ounce of Vagina said:
The Clinton health rumors are the same sort of desperate wishful thinking behind the birthers minus the racism. It offers the comforting idea that the person they hate isn't really going to be president, they're going to be arrested and executed for treason or fall over dead any moment now.

I can't find it now, but just before and right after the 2008 election there was this site where people who believed pretty much every Obama conspiracy theory gathered to wail and gnash their teeth as they waited for the UN stormtroopers to come take their guns, forcibly convert them to Islam, and make them gay. Some of them would write up fake indictments against Obama for treason or whatever, and the others would say they were praying over them night and day in the hope that God would make them real.

I see the same desperate magical thinking going on today. People who believe and spread these rumors want to believe them because it offers a way out from a reality they cannot accept. It lets them feel like they're in control and live in a just world where evil (in their definition) always loses. It also gives them the conspiracy-theorist's high of being so much smarter than the sheeple and knowing what's "really going on".
Click to expand...
Except, Obama was new and more or less an empty vessel. What's worse, new blood they can project all of their batshit fears onto, or someone who's actually left a trail of pain and misery in their wake?
 
Probably cough medicine but it's still funny that she gets a coughing fit right as she's trying to disprove the bad rumors about her health.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom