MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election  Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused    Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm pretty sure that being accused of being the Anti-Christ is a sure sign that someone isn't the Anti-Christ, according to scripture, so I always find it amusing whenever any politician is accused. There hasn't been an American politician popular enough in the past, like, 60 years.
Given how much the internet has created a culture of unlimited contrarianism is it even possible to have anything with as much universal approval as the Antichrist is supposed to have?
 
Trump's new campaign manager is a real winner. Paul Manafort has been a successful lobbyist for some of the nastiest African tyrants of the last half-century. Including Jonas Savimbi; who waged a war against the government of Angola for decades, indiscriminately laid landmines which beggar the country to this day, and began his career as a Maoist: Mboutu Sese Seko; who took one of the planets richest countries and sucked the life out of it so completely it snowballed into the deadliest conflict the planet had seen since World War II: and Siad Barre; whose rule over Somalia was so horrendous, punative, and psychopathic, most Somalis to this day prefer living under the stateless Xeer system rather than risk another Barre taking over and fucking them with even less lubrication than Barre.

This must've been what Trump was talking about when he said he had a great relationship with the blacks. Truly, he's a man fit for their company.

Given how much the internet has created a culture of unlimited contrarianism is it even possible to have anything with as much universal approval as the Antichrist is supposed to have?
My theory is the Antichrist already came centuries ago, and the events of Revelations already happened.
 
Trump's new campaign manager is a real winner. Paul Manafort has been a successful lobbyist for some of the nastiest African tyrants of the last half-century. Including Jonas Savimbi; who waged a war against the government of Angola for decades, indiscriminately laid landmines which beggar the country to this day, and began his career as a Maoist: Mboutu Sese Seko; who took one of the planets richest countries and sucked the life out of it so completely it snowballed into the deadliest conflict the planet had seen since World War II: and Siad Barre; whose rule over Somalia was so horrendous, punative, and psychopathic, most Somalis to this day prefer living under the stateless Xeer system rather than risk another Barre taking over and fucking them with even less lubrication than Barre.

This must've been what Trump was talking about when he said he had a great relationship with the blacks. Truly, he's a man fit for their company.


My theory is the Antichrist already came centuries ago, and the events of Revelations already happened.

God didn't deliver on the whole 'rivers and oceans turning into blood' thing then. I want my money back.
 
According to a Clinton supporter I conversed with, the solution to the "problem" of Trump and race relation issues of the United States is to:

"The task facing us today is pushing these people back under their rock and keeping them there until they die.

You may not feel this threat very seriously, but it may be because you are a white person who has not yet made the decision to stand with people of color against white supremacy and systemic racism. White supremacy affects all white people and clouds their vision. It's not surprising that a lot cannot see what's the big deal about Trump and all the things he brings with him.
"

Apparently disenfranchisement of Trump voters and others is the first order of business to a more equal America.

When asked how the bolded section above was any different from trying to keep other groups from making themselves heard, I received this in response:

"I think you may be having a bout of white fragility."

:|
 
According to a Clinton supporter I conversed with, the solution to the "problem" of Trump and race relation issues of the United States is to:

"The task facing us today is pushing these people back under their rock and keeping them there until they die.

You may not feel this threat very seriously, but it may be because you are a white person who has not yet made the decision to stand with people of color against white supremacy and systemic racism. White supremacy affects all white people and clouds their vision. It's not surprising that a lot cannot see what's the big deal about Trump and all the things he brings with him.
"

Apparently disenfranchisement of Trump voters and others is the first order of business to a more equal America.

When asked how the bolded section above was any different from trying to keep other groups from making themselves heard, I received this in response:

"I think you may be having a bout of white fragility."

:|
Did you slap the bitch out of this guy for using the words "white fragility" unironically?
 
Did you slap the bitch out of this guy for using the words "white fragility" unironically?

I laughed at the poster (I presume it was a woman) for suggesting that my observation of parallels between her ideas and her accused oppressors'.

When I saw the original comment, the irony of "pushing [white] people under" was not lost to me. Remember, LBJ noted that the riots during the 1960s were not a huge surprise:

"When you put your foot on a man's neck and hold him down for three hundred years, and then you let him up, what's he going to do? He's going to knock your block off."

This parallel went right over this person's head.
 
According to a Clinton supporter I conversed with, the solution to the "problem" of Trump and race relation issues of the United States is to:

"The task facing us today is pushing these people back under their rock and keeping them there until they die.

You may not feel this threat very seriously, but it may be because you are a white person who has not yet made the decision to stand with people of color against white supremacy and systemic racism. White supremacy affects all white people and clouds their vision. It's not surprising that a lot cannot see what's the big deal about Trump and all the things he brings with him.
"

Apparently disenfranchisement of Trump voters and others is the first order of business to a more equal America.

When asked how the bolded section above was any different from trying to keep other groups from making themselves heard, I received this in response:

"I think you may be having a bout of white fragility."

:|

How dare those racists not roll over and admit defeat because I told them to? I'm going to call them racists again!
 
How dare those racists not roll over and admit defeat because I told them to? I'm going to call them racists again!

Evidently, all white people are racist, white supremacists because of how unfair and biased things are nowadays. Here's more from the same individual as earlier, though this first bit wasn't for me directly:

"If white people had done their job, we wouldn't have Trump or the Christian Identity, Neo-Nazi, white supremacist militias and all the white male lone wolves, heavily armed and alienated from a reality that isn't all white."

I responded to this as I did the other one, noting parallels to the policies and ideas regarding Muslims discussed by Trump, whom this person rather openly loathed. After noting these similarities and problems of casting such a broad net over a group of people, I received this response:

"I think it's pretty clear that, in a system in which they were advantaged, white people as a whole did not take seriously the requests, suggestions or demands by people of color to change the laws so that people of color would be protected from racist violence. Read about the history of the campaigns to get anti-lynching laws enacted. If you can show me a mass movement of white people who insisted that these laws be enacted and didn't rest until they were, then I will eat my hat.

Your position -- that I'm blaming an entire race for actions of individuals -- rests on a denial of systemic racism, which is a system in which the political, economic, social, cultural, educational, and justice system was designed to benefit white people. Not "people" but white people. White people as a whole did not worry about violent white supremacists. Some individuals did and do, but as a whole, white people did not. Today, there are more white people who are recognizing the threat of white supremacy, but there is still a lot of outright denial going on.

Your main interest seems to be in wringing some kind of absolution of "white people" from me.
"

Amusingly, I never made any comment regarding systemic racism at all, much less denying it. As an aside, I did respond to the challenge to name whites who sought to aid blacks, noting the efforts of Eleanor Roosevelt and others in the 1940s and why they got where they had. As of yet, I haven't received any more responses as of yet--perhaps this individual is wolfing down their hat, though somehow I doubt that.

This had come up earlier but in light of all else, it's pretty laughable:

"I think your response to what I wrote is the impulse that leads people to make charges of reverse racism, which is basically what you did by quoting that thing about the boots on the neck."

Somehow it's my impulses that lead to people charging reverse racism after I am literally textwalled into oblivion with this condemnation of white people. Clearly my bad. :roll:
 
Evidently, all white people are racist, white supremacists because of how unfair and biased things are nowadays. Here's more from the same individual as earlier, though this first bit wasn't for me directly:

"If white people had done their job, we wouldn't have Trump or the Christian Identity, Neo-Nazi, white supremacist militias and all the white male lone wolves, heavily armed and alienated from a reality that isn't all white."

I responded to this as I did the other one, noting parallels to the policies and ideas regarding Muslims discussed by Trump, whom this person rather openly loathed. After noting these similarities and problems of casting such a broad net over a group of people, I received this response:

"I think it's pretty clear that, in a system in which they were advantaged, white people as a whole did not take seriously the requests, suggestions or demands by people of color to change the laws so that people of color would be protected from racist violence. Read about the history of the campaigns to get anti-lynching laws enacted. If you can show me a mass movement of white people who insisted that these laws be enacted and didn't rest until they were, then I will eat my hat.

Your position -- that I'm blaming an entire race for actions of individuals -- rests on a denial of systemic racism, which is a system in which the political, economic, social, cultural, educational, and justice system was designed to benefit white people. Not "people" but white people. White people as a whole did not worry about violent white supremacists. Some individuals did and do, but as a whole, white people did not. Today, there are more white people who are recognizing the threat of white supremacy, but there is still a lot of outright denial going on.

Your main interest seems to be in wringing some kind of absolution of "white people" from me.
"

Amusingly, I never made any comment regarding systemic racism at all, much less denying it. As an aside, I did respond to the challenge to name whites who sought to aid blacks, noting the efforts of Eleanor Roosevelt and others in the 1940s and why they got where they had. As of yet, I haven't received any more responses as of yet--perhaps this individual is wolfing down their hat, though somehow I doubt that.

This had come up earlier but in light of all else, it's pretty laughable:

"I think your response to what I wrote is the impulse that leads people to make charges of reverse racism, which is basically what you did by quoting that thing about the boots on the neck."

Somehow it's my impulses that lead to people charging reverse racism after I am literally textwalled into oblivion with this condemnation of white people. Clearly my bad. :roll:
I wish John Brown were still alive.

He'd wipe his ass with the complete text of Hard Choices on toilet paper rolls.
 
I wish John Brown were still alive.

He'd wipe his ass with the complete text of Hard Choices on toilet paper rolls.

Rather than taking the issue head on, I'm sure John Brown would be proud to see that the effort of trying to help others achieve better conditions and treatment has now been made into a routine cycle of typing "r-a-c-i-s-t-!" many times a day. It's clearly been a bulletproof way to promote your ideas and to put them into force.

The whole keyboard commando bit has become a staple of politics nowadays, and people seem to be both more fringy and fickle as a result of it to my eye.
 
I wish John Brown were still alive.

He'd wipe his ass with the complete text of Hard Choices on toilet paper rolls.

Rather than taking the issue head on, I'm sure John Brown would be proud to see that the effort of trying to help others achieve better conditions and treatment has now been made into a routine cycle of typing "r-a-c-i-s-t-!" many times a day. It's clearly been a bulletproof way to promote your ideas and to put them into force.

The whole keyboard commando bit has become a staple of politics nowadays, and people seem to be both more fringy and fickle as a result of it to my eye.

To be fair, it will probably prove more effective than John Brown's patented "Completely fail and get shot" method.

In any case, I have noticed some of the media frenzy calming down in the lull between the official end of the primaries and the start of the election season. How have Clinton and Trump's campaigns been shaping up, with their internal opposition removed? I hear Sanders is still doing his thing?
 
To be fair, it will probably prove more effective than John Brown's patented "Completely fail and get shot" method.

In any case, I have noticed some of the media frenzy calming down in the lull between the official end of the primaries and the start of the election season. How have Clinton and Trump's campaigns been shaping up, with their internal opposition removed? I hear Sanders is still doing his thing?

Eh, I wouldn't say that it'd be more effective--at doing what it's apparently intended to do anyway. If this person was trying to persuade me to vote Clinton, as calling me and every other white person as racist, white supremacists didn't encourage me too much.

I'm not sure what to expect in the time between now and the general; just dig out your popcorn or Raisinets and enjoy the entertainment I suppose.
 
Last edited:
To be fair, it will probably prove more effective than John Brown's patented "Completely fail and get shot" method.

In any case, I have noticed some of the media frenzy calming down in the lull between the official end of the primaries and the start of the election season. How have Clinton and Trump's campaigns been shaping up, with their internal opposition removed? I hear Sanders is still doing his thing?
John Brown's raid may have, just like the rest of his endeavors, been a failure; he's still one of the five most important causes of the war that ended slavery in the US; up with the cotton gin, Dredd Scott, and the Turner Rebellion.
 
John Brown's raid may have, just like the rest of his endeavors, been a failure; he's still one of the five most important causes of the war that ended slavery in the US; up with the cotton gin, Dredd Scott, and the Turner Rebellion.

That's another reason why I mentioned fickleness as being common nowadays too. They seem to want to give up if victory is not assured then bitch about how biased everything is...rather than opposing it, seeking change.
 
John Brown's raid may have, just like the rest of his endeavors, been a failure; he's still one of the five most important causes of the war that ended slavery in the US; up with the cotton gin, Dredd Scott, and the Turner Rebellion.

Also he was willing to go to actual war and get killed for his beliefs, which ultimately turned out to be right. I wouldn't recommend his course of action to anyone, really, but there's a reason he's still remembered and admired, even if he was a crazy son of a bitch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom