MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

First title

second title

third title

Fourth title

Fifth and Sixth title

Seventh title

eighth title

Ninth title

tenth title

All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.

Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)

 

[AnOminous]

I'm not defending Sanders tactics (or his supporters conduct) but the DNC is fucking useless and in the pocket of whoever's friends with it.

I'm not sure what Sanders et al should have done. Apparently just kneel and suck Hillary's girlcock. Or play patty cake while she continues to play knife in the back politics. Fuck that noise.

 

[Emiya Kiwitsugu]

Schultz as party head has been a complete failure. Not only have the democrats bled senators and representatives since her appointment, she's presented no strategy to turn the losses around. When she's not doing the bidding of whatever industry bought her she's screwing around in the primary. She was always in the Clinton camp and deliberately scheduled debates in poorly viewed timeslots to give sanders little exposure, among other schemes she pulled.

I'm not defending Sanders tactics (or his supporters conduct) but the DNC is fucking useless and in the pocket of whoever's friends with it.

I would not have sex with the DNC.

DWS has been a pretty bad chair. Having a contest where one of the people running is a person you've long been a vocal supporter of is enough in of itself to cause concern, and she has certainly showed Clinton some amount of favoritism in the contests. She should step down, and I imagine she won't run again as the DNC chair after this term, which is over at the end of this year, but specifically endorsing her primary challenger as a way of getting back at her is where things cross the line a bit.

And, for what it's worth, I really doubt DWS could have done much to change the outcome of 2014, or made greater gains in 2012. Their success or failure in any cycle is more to do with the factors surrounding that time, and a mid-term with a fairly unfavorable incumbent Democratic president on his 6th year in office is going to be a pretty big drag. Howard Dean made great gains for the party during his two elections he oversaw, but even that was probably more to do with the fact those elections were at the height of anti-Bush sentiment in the country.

 

[Takayuki Yagami]

She should step down, and I imagine she won't run again as the DNC chair after this term, which is over at the end of this year, but specifically endorsing her primary challenger as a way of getting back at her is where things cross the line a bit.

Why? Sanders's perogitive seems to be to either gain control of the nomination and shape policy and opinion that way; or foment discontent with the Democratic voters against the powers that be in order to make someone like him more viable in the future. He has no real reason to be loyal to them. They've demonstrably screwed him at several points throughout this. It honestly makes me like him more considering the thing he's seemed to lack throughout all this so far was a spine.

 

[JU 199]

Why? Sanders's perogitive seems to be to either gain control of the nomination and shape policy and opinion that way; or foment discontent with the Democratic voters against the powers that be in order to make someone like him more viable in the future. He has no real reason to be loyal to them. They've demonstrably screwed him at several points throughout this.

Sanders will have the last laugh anyway*. The Hillary camp has no idea how to deal with trump. He's Teflon because he's shameless, which means pointing in his direction and saying 'LOOK AT WHAT HE SAID THE NERVE OF THIS MAN' isn't going to work. They cant run on Hilary's persona because everyone dislikes her and 'being the adult in the room' wont work because Americans don't give a fuck about that.

Many people alive today want a tough guy to beat up their enemies regardless of the consequences. The only way of defeating trump will be to humiliate him and destroy that persona. He's more than capable of doing that to himself if Hilary goaded him into it. However Hillary is super jaded and I doubt she allows dissenters within her ranks. That strategy isn't going to be apparent to her.

*because of all the nuclear wars trump will start over his dick

 

[XYZpdq]

which means pointing in his direction and saying 'LOOK AT WHAT HE SAID THE NERVE OF THIS MAN' isn't going to work.

I saw a spot for that on TV the other night. It took me a little bit into the spot to tell if it was for or against him.
That's the funniest part. "LOOK AT WHAT HE SAID THE NERVE OF THIS MAN" is pretty much his entire campaign in a sentence. It not only doesn't work, that resistance only makes his penis harder, to invoke the old dankness.

 

[Emiya Kiwitsugu]

I saw a spot for that on TV the other night. It took me a little bit into the spot to tell if it was for or against him.
That's the funniest part. "LOOK AT WHAT HE SAID THE NERVE OF THIS MAN" is pretty much his entire campaign in a sentence. It not only doesn't work, that resistance only makes his penis harder, to invoke the old dankness.

I doubt any ads against him are going to peel off any serious Trump supporters, or people who have been okay with anything he's said so far. I imagine that, if anything, their strategy is more to remind people who currently dislike him, or have disliked him at some point in the past, as to what it was they were upset about in the first place.

Trump's ability to dominate media coverage with new story threads within the span of one or two days has caused such an overflow of information about him that, frankly, a lot of people have forgotten about a number of specific incendiary comments or actions. Because of the ridiculous amount of specific incidents there are to remember, it's quite possible that people could ease up to him if he tones down some of his rhetoric, at least towards select communities. If that's the case, then spamming the TV with ads to remind voters why they disliked him in the first place may work, or at least make his attempts to reconcile with groups, such as the women vote, more difficult.

 

[Sweet and Savoury]

My worry about HRC is that Trump will rip her apart

She's got more skeletons in her closet then Jack the Ripper, she flip flops like crazy on important issues and she doesn't have a singular charismatic bone in her whole body to try to win the hearts of her people.

Running on "vote for me because I'm a woman and it's my turn" ain't helping her with any group aside the feminazis SJW crowd and they're more of a liability then anything else.

Any you just know the Republicans will get their hands on those speech transcripts and I'm guessing what she said in those speeches will really hurt her in the eyes of the average democratic voter.

All in all, I'm laying money on President Trump.

 

[RepQuest]

I could see that, if it wasn't for the fact a large amount of the party publicly broke towards and supported a freshman Senator named Barack Obama in 2008. Not counting the people who went over from Clinton to Obama once it was clear he was winning, Obama was still up over one hundred superdelegates compared to Clinton then. Hell, you even had Harry Reid, the long serving and then Senate Majority Leader, arguably the second highest ranking Democrat in the nation then after Nancy Pelosi, specifically sitting down Obama and telling him he should run because they wanted an alternative to Clinton.

I don't doubt they have a great amount of influence and control, at least of certain people, but there are enough established politicians and leaders who wouldn't want to bet a tool to the Clinton family. I'm skeptical that the Clintons, after losing the superdelegates to Obama already in 2008, could proceed to gain such a foothold in the party whilst Obama was serving two terms as the head of it.

As I've said before, there isn't anyone in the upper echelons of the Democratic leadership who can counter the Clintons' influence in any meaningful way this cycle. There isn't anyone there for Sanders this time like Ted Kennedy was for Obama in 2008.

 

[TrippinKahlua]

Isnt it great that Trump is likely gonna be our your President?

Just today, I told my sous chef about my fantasy that the Trump Presidency is gonna cause us all to grow out Those Golden Freckles I spoke of before. Of course, he thought that sounded silly.

But its true.

 

[Piga Dgrifm]

Isnt it great that Trump is likely gonna be our your President?

Just today, I told my sous chef about my fantasy that the Trump Presidency is gonna cause us all to grow out Those Golden Freckles I spoke of before. Of course, he thought that sounded silly.

But its true.

Dropping anchor here again, eh baby?

 

[Joan Nyan]

Trump, having just won the Washington State primary, is now only 4 delegates away from being guaranteed the nomination. Not that there was any doubt but it feels good anyway.

 

[autisticdragonkin]

I hope that Bernie continues to campaign against Hillary to help Trump beat her

 

[Joan Nyan]

I hope that Bernie continues to campaign against Hillary to help Trump beat her

I hope that Sanders endorses Trump after losing the nomination. It's unlikely but I can dream.

 

[autisticdragonkin]

I hope that Sanders endorses Trump after losing the nomination. It's unlikely but I can dream.

They both support everyday Americans against the 1% with the only difference being the Trump is more competent and more redpilled

 

[Pikimon]

Except that Sanders and Trump differ in every single policy and ideological position ever.

One believes that Climate Change is real, man-made and has to be dealt with immediately.
The other says that Climate Change is a hoax created by China to weaken the American economy.

You have to be a special kind of autistic to believe that Sanders would ever endorse Trump in any way.

 

[AnOminous]

Except that Sanders and Trump differ in every single policy and ideological position ever.

One believes that Climate Change is real, man-made and has to be dealt with immediately.
The other says that Climate Change is a hoax created by China to weaken the American economy.

He just says that. Meanwhile he's actually building a sea wall to protect his own golf course from it.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-climate-change-golf-course-223436

Trump just says whatever gives feels to the gullible monkeys who worship him like a God. He doesn't actually believe a thing he says.

 

[Shokew]

Trump just says whatever gives feels to the gullible monkeys who worship him like a God. He doesn't actually believe a thing he says.

This guy (Trump) is going to lie us into a "Second Great Depression +" AND "WW3 +" set of scenarios, isn't he? I don't care if he's considered better than HRC, that's all I see him doing to us and the world at large, as if both aren't happening already. That - I find pretty depressing to think about, as it feels inevitable, at this point.

Fallout 5 - IRL Edition is now more on the table than ever before...

 

[Picklechu]

My worry about HRC is that Trump will rip her apart

She's got more skeletons in her closet then Jack the Ripper, she flip flops like crazy on important issues and she doesn't have a singular charismatic bone in her whole body to try to win the hearts of her people.

Running on "vote for me because I'm a woman and it's my turn" ain't helping her with any group aside the feminazis SJW crowd and they're more of a liability then anything else.

Any you just know the Republicans will get their hands on those speech transcripts and I'm guessing what she said in those speeches will really hurt her in the eyes of the average democratic voter.

All in all, I'm laying money on President Trump.

They both have extreme negatives, though, and the Democrats have a built-in Electoral College advantage that I don't think Trump can overcome. I think it will probably be close in terms of the popular vote, but that Clinton will win in the Electoral College by a relatively comfortable margin, since Trump's only path is through the Rust Belt, and I don't think there are enough white, blue-collar voters there that he can flip.

The best analogy I can think of off the top of my head (at least in terms of how I think the popular vote will go) is Virginia's 2013 gubernatorial election, in which two candidates with extremely high negatives fought it out, a Libertarian drew a small chunk of the vote, and the demographics, which favored the Democrat, allowed him to eke out a win.

 

[Pikimon]

He just says that. Meanwhile he's actually building a sea wall to protect his own golf course from it.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-climate-change-golf-course-223436

Trump just says whatever gives feels to the gullible monkeys who worship him like a God. He doesn't actually believe a thing he says.

So basically we have 2 lying crooks who will say anything to get votes running for president.

 

[AnOminous]

So basically we have 2 lying crooks who will say anything to get votes running for president.

One of them won't say shit on the order of the Moon landings being faked, be an antivaxer, deny all climate science (while acting on it to protect his own property), etc. Even the ability to tell plausible lies rather than lies that would only convince the dumbest of morons represents actual skill.