MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
Corypheus said:
The GM of my guild in WoW just said the people she works with would be going to a Trump rally in a few days to act as provocateurs with super racist (the phrase she mentioned was Black Lives Don't Matter) signs. It amazed me the she lacked any self-awareness as to why that's a stupid fucking idea. Granted, she's in California and works at a doggy daycare so her friends might not know what they're doing. If something happens, you heard it from me first.
Click to expand...

Take. Her. Coat.
 
Null said:
They've been trying for a year now. The worst they got on him is a company subcontractor employing polish immigrants illegally; something he didn't have an involved role in. They've tried calling him a sexist xenophobic islamophobic racist and it's not worked. The only time his ratings fell was when he said some shit about abortion and that might be the achille's heel.

It really boils down to this:

In this election, the first after China has surpassed the United States GDP, as China fabricates claims on three different American ally's sovereign land, as radical islam dismantles the European Union, as Russia flies jets over NATO turkey to test the alliance, as our economy breaks down and prepares for another stock market crash -- in this election, will the American people still vote on single-issue social problems like tranny bathroom wedding abortions? Would America rather have a criminal that's pro-abortion than a professional who's for state abortion laws?
Click to expand...

Null? Were you playing Crusader Kings 2 while listening to ghost again?
 
waffle said:
Trump has weak points, but not in the conventional sense. His negatives are all pretty much out in the open and unlike most election cycles I don't think he's going to have any major out of the woodwork scandals that Hillary is so good at exploiting. I don't think Hillary has every had anyone with the balls and inclination to try and out-snake her so she's not going to be on her usual firm footing.
Click to expand...
Agreed. Hillary's been playing a game of checkers her whole life with the game stacked in her favor, and Trump comes swinging in playing Calvinball. She'll spend the whole time screaming "you can't do that!" while Trump runs circles around her.
 
If I was fighting trump I would play mind games with him. The dude's ego is super fragile. Just manufacture a few stories about his small genitals and his overweight body. Photoshop him a few pounds heavier and get them trending on twitter.

I swear, he would implode if you pushed it hard enough.

kobebyarlant said:
She'll spend the whole time screaming "you can't do that!" while Trump runs circles around her.
Click to expand...


Yeah that's probably what's going to happen.
 
Lol the electoral map is going to look like shit not seen since Goldwater. Just crown Queen Hillary already.
 
Dudeofteenage said:
That's funny, because I think the Goldwater campaign is a good example of a losing campaign by Republicans that ultimately had an outsize, but toxic, influence on the party's future. Goldwater didn't set them up to win future elections, but he did ensure that when they won, they were far worse for the USA and the world than they were in the pre-Goldwater era.

I'm also not entirely sure that the general electorate really cares so intently about the Republican party's inner machinery. It's always tempting to read what happens in the primaries as a signal for the general election, but quite often the primaries have very little effect (beyond the choice of the nominee, obviously). Just because Bruz beat Trump in Iowa, doesn't mean Trump is less likely to win Iowa in a general election; just because Sanders and Hilary supporters are duking it out right now, doesn't mean they'll stay home in November if their favoured candidate isn't the nominee. All claims that the day-to-day of the primary will directly influence the general need to be taken with several grains of salt. The media have a built in bias against playing down events, because they want people to think the stories they're running matter as much as as even vaguely plausible. But there's no reason the rest of us have to buy it.
Click to expand...
I have been looking for stuff about goldwater but I can't find much stuff about him and his "toxic influence". Personally I think that Trump is going to lose but he is necessary to get people to start questioning the liberal consensus and will improve the republican party in the future
 
Last edited:
Ass Manager 3000 said:
If I was fighting trump I would play mind games with him. The dude's ego is super fragile. Just manufacture a few stories about his small genitals and his overweight body. Photoshop him a few pounds heavier and get them trending on twitter.
Click to expand...

Once upon a time there was an article in the 1988 issue of SPY magazine which the writer of the article described Trump as a "short fingered vulgarian". The editor of SPY magazine says that to this day (as of 2015) he regularly receives an occasional envelope with a picture of trump's hand, with the fingers circled to highlight the length of his fingers, and usually with a note written in gold sharpie that said "see not so short!"

The fact that he was so wounded by an off-handed remark on a relatively small magazine that he has to keep writing to the editor nearly 30 years after the fact doesn't say much about his mental fortitude.

Donald Trump is famously very thin-skinned and litigious to anyone who makes fun of him.
 
Pikimon said:
Donald Trump is famously very thin-skinned and litigious to anyone who makes fun of him.
Click to expand...

He's also just a lying sack of shit in general. His entire business career consists of defrauding people stupid enough to buy into the Trump name and "invest" in his scams.

Then he steals all the money, declares bankruptcy and walks away.

Anyone dumb enough to fall for Trump's bullshit pretty much deserves to.
 
Lucky Wildcard said:
Update on Hillary's E-mail scandal: It's confirmed that the State Department withheld an e-mail that exposed her private servers before wiping it, basically confirming that she used her government e-mail account for personal uses.
Click to expand...

Well no shit, everyone knew that already. Hillary is completely unscrupulous and breaks the law whenever the costs of breaking it are exceeded by the costs of complying with it.

This is the new normal.
 
AnOminous said:
Well no shit, everyone knew that already. Hillary is completely unscrupulous and breaks the law whenever the costs of breaking it are exceeded by the costs of complying with it.

This is the new normal.
Click to expand...
Isn't that just the law failing rather than the individuals. The purpose of laws is to provide punishment such that it reduces the net gain someone receives from breaking them so that they will not perform that action.

I don't know what you mean by this being the new normal. If you mean that the legal systems are only deterring the poor I would agree and add that we should uniformly increase punishments for everyone. If you mean that now people are more rational and take cost benefit analysis into account more I would dispute that by saying that people are likely still very irrational but better education may have increased rationality recently and this is a positive shift. It is even a positive shift for following the law because it means that once the legal system catches up with human development then there will be significantly less crime and even now crime is lowering
 
Last edited:
Pikimon said:
Once upon a time there was an article in the 1988 issue of SPY magazine which the writer of the article described Trump as a "short fingered vulgarian". The editor of SPY magazine says that to this day (as of 2015) he regularly receives an occasional envelope with a picture of trump's hand, with the fingers circled to highlight the length of his fingers, and usually with a note written in gold sharpie that said "see not so short!"

The fact that he was so wounded by an off-handed remark on a relatively small magazine that he has to keep writing to the editor nearly 30 years after the fact doesn't say much about his mental fortitude.

Donald Trump is famously very thin-skinned and litigious to anyone who makes fun of him.
Click to expand...

?????????

DjbbdJo.jpg
 
autisticdragonkin said:
Isn't that just the law failing rather than the individuals. The purpose of laws is to provide punishment such that it reduces the net gain someone receives from breaking them so that they will not perform that action.
Click to expand...

It's more about how Hillary considers herself above the law because she's wealthy and politically powerful.

Take Dennis Hastert. He diddled a bunch of teenage boys and paid hush money to cover it up. It took 30 years for this to come to light, and he's only getting 15 months in prison. Do you think you would receive such leniency from both the court or the media if you were accused of such a crime?
 
Wallace said:
It's more about how Hillary considers herself above the law because she's wealthy and politically powerful.

Take Dennis Hastert. He diddled a bunch of teenage boys and paid hush money to cover it up. It took 30 years for this to come to light, and he's only getting 15 months in prison. Do you think you would receive such leniency from both the court or the media if you were accused of such a crime?
Click to expand...
That is something completely different from what @AnOminous said but I agree with that. The powerful should get the exact same punishment for crimes no more and no less than everyone else
 
Wallace said:
It's more about how Hillary considers herself above the law because she's wealthy and politically powerful.

Take Dennis Hastert. He diddled a bunch of teenage boys and paid hush money to cover it up. It took 30 years for this to come to light, and he's only getting 15 months in prison. Do you think you would receive such leniency from both the court or the media if you were accused of such a crime?
Click to expand...
A bit OT, but he's going to jail for violating some financial laws related to the hush money, not the touching kids. Unfortunately, the statute of limitations on those incidents have all expired.
 
Picklechu said:
A bit OT, but he's going to jail for violating some financial laws related to the hush money, not the touching kids. Unfortunately, the statute of limitations on those incidents have all expired.
Click to expand...
Do you think he would've been able to cover it up past the statute of limitations expiration had he not been an extraordinarily wealthy and powerful individual? He spent longer paying these bribes than a lot of people on this forum have spent alive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom