MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election  Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused    Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If the performance of Cruz's campaign in the North Dakotan convention is anything to go off of, Cruz is much more adept at courting unbound delegates to his side than is Trump. That said, there would be some humor in Trump getting the nomination as a result of the votes from some unbound delegates from American Samoa.

Apparently Kanye West is still pretty serious about running for President in 2020 (and most likely going under the Democrat's wing), so chances are the Democrats could actually end up like the Republicans are this election when the next one comes.
If only.
 
The former is a bit of political hyperbole taken out of whatever its original context was for the purpose of a hit piece, and the latter is a fact.

There is no more justification in calling Cruz an "extremist" for making statements you consider dumb than there is calling Sanders one for his assertion that climate change is our #1 national security problem.
Actually, climate change is a big national security problem. Part of it has to do with the risk of coastal military bases being flooded due to rising sea levels.
 
Actually, climate change is a big national security problem. Part of it has to do with the risk of coastal military bases being flooded due to rising sea levels.
Presuming that climate change is real, the need to take flooding into account is a legitimate concern. Terrorist attacks, however, are a more immediate issue. Sanders has proposed that the rise in terrorism is directly related to climate change, which is a proposal that doesn't stand up under analysis.
 
Presuming that climate change is real, the need to take flooding into account is a legitimate concern. Terrorist attacks, however, are a more immediate issue. Sanders has proposed that the rise in terrorism is directly related to climate change, which is a proposal that doesn't stand up under analysis.
I don't know. Realistically speaking, terrorist attacks will always be an immediate threat and there really is no stopping them permanently, unless somehow the idea of Islamic extremism just dies out. And good luck shooting an idea to death.

We really can't defend against shit if we irreversibly fuck up our ecosystem.
 
The only thing that sort of prevents Rubio from being the candidate in 2020 is that he said he wasn't planning on doing politics for a while.

That's the kind of promise nobody but political obsessives will remember in 2019.

I doubt it. Even if he somehow rehabilitates his image in the eyes of the party he'll still be too late. The overton window will keep moving right within the GOP.

Since the early 90s the Republicans have usually chosen candidates who were somewhat to the left of the party's consensus in the hope of appealing to the broader electorate (Mitt Romney, John McCain, Bob Dole, George Bush Snr, etc etc). In the 00s and 10s a lot of the grassroots party, both inside and outside the Tea Party, have started to question that strategy and said that they need a true believer, arguing that the Romney-Dole RINOs are just too 'wimpy' to energise the electorate.

If Trump is the candidate - even though he's not exactly a true believer - then this narrative will be strongly damaged, and the pressure will be on in 2020 to pick a candidate who's to the left of the party mainstream. And Rubio will be a good fit. It's true the party's moving rightward, but a Rubio pick actually illustrates that - back when Rubio entered the Senate in 2010 he was considered a quasi Tea Partier, and a lot of his positions would have been considered dangerously radical during the Bush years.
 
I doubt it. Even if he somehow rehabilitates his image in the eyes of the party he'll still be too late. The overton window will keep moving right within the GOP.
Political positions really have nothing to do with the results of this year's election. Trump's support comes entirely for his personality and outsider status. Rubio died on the vine not because Trump credibly attacked him from the Right, but because Rubio's synthetic nature represents everything they don't want in the White House.

The really funny part of all this is that Trump's just as much of a hollow suit as any human being could be, but he's also spent his entire life so sheltered from reality he's completely incapable of understanding that actions can have negative consequences. Such retardation being mistaken for authenticity of courage just highlights how deprived we are from the real thing.
 
Political positions really have nothing to do with the results of this year's election. Trump's support comes entirely for his personality and outsider status. Rubio died on the vine not because Trump credibly attacked him from the Right, but because Rubio's synthetic nature represents everything they don't want in the White House.

The really funny part of all this is that Trump's just as much of a hollow suit as any human being could be, but he's also spent his entire life so sheltered from reality he's completely incapable of understanding that actions can have negative consequences. Such retardation being mistaken for authenticity of courage just highlights how deprived we are from the real thing.
Rubio is just regular fake
Trump is so completely 100% fake and artificial that he comes off as being more real than anyone else because of the sheer audacity of his fakeness
 
If Trump is the candidate - even though he's not exactly a true believer - then this narrative will be strongly damaged, and the pressure will be on in 2020 to pick a candidate who's to the left of the party mainstream. And Rubio will be a good fit. It's true the party's moving rightward, but a Rubio pick actually illustrates that - back when Rubio entered the Senate in 2010 he was considered a quasi Tea Partier, and a lot of his positions would have been considered dangerously radical during the Bush years.
That worked for Ronald Reagan because he actually put up a worthy fight before the loss, and was ultimately vindicated by the subsequent failures of Ford and Carter.

Rubio doesn't have that. Nobody looks like anyone's golden boy when even the full backing of the movers and shakers doesn't keep you from losing your home stage by double digits. Sarah Palin's put up a better showing.

Not that I like it, mind you. I'd actually be fine with Rubio as President. Hell, I'd vote for him over Clinton in a heartbeat. But he's fucked as a serious figure from now until his bullet-related death next year at the hands of Augustus Sol Invicus carrying out the will of the message he received from Der Trumpenfuehrer through reading the organs of a timely animal sacrifice.
 
That's the kind of promise nobody but political obsessives will remember in 2019.



Since the early 90s the Republicans have usually chosen candidates who were somewhat to the left of the party's consensus in the hope of appealing to the broader electorate (Mitt Romney, John McCain, Bob Dole, George Bush Snr, etc etc). In the 00s and 10s a lot of the grassroots party, both inside and outside the Tea Party, have started to question that strategy and said that they need a true believer, arguing that the Romney-Dole RINOs are just too 'wimpy' to energise the electorate.

If Trump is the candidate - even though he's not exactly a true believer - then this narrative will be strongly damaged, and the pressure will be on in 2020 to pick a candidate who's to the left of the party mainstream. And Rubio will be a good fit. It's true the party's moving rightward, but a Rubio pick actually illustrates that - back when Rubio entered the Senate in 2010 he was considered a quasi Tea Partier, and a lot of his positions would have been considered dangerously radical during the Bush years.

If Rubio runs in 2020, I actually might vote for him.
 
Political positions really have nothing to do with the results of this year's election. Trump's support comes entirely for his personality and outsider status. Rubio died on the vine not because Trump credibly attacked him from the Right, but because Rubio's synthetic nature represents everything they don't want in the White House.
In part, yes, but immigration and trade policy have become the dominant issues of this election, partially because of Trump's agitation on those issues. He tapped into a vein that was about to surface and it's still gushing.
 
https://kiwifarms.net/media/razorfistspoliticalwisdom1.1537/full?d=1461286303

I've kept this puppy snug in my mind palace because I knew it'd be even funnier than it was the first time.

https://kiwifarms.net/media/razorfistspoliticalwisdom2.1538/full?d=1461286303

I'm far from optimistic this'll change much now that it's out. As Oscar Wilde might as well have said: people's reputation is almost never judged by their actions. But that's not the point. Gloating is so much more fun when you know you're gonna get to do it in advanced.

What's your defense for this, @TrippinKahlua, my dear highyella anchorbaby? Does this seem like the work of someone who cares remotely about any political issue whatsoever?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom