MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election  Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused    Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
oqXMiTx.png

Never change FARK...

I wish Fark would not have their own discussion boards. I mean there is nothing to do but shit post. Literaly nothing to do but shit post.

Not that I should say anything but the way they do it is just boring as fuck.
 
Last edited:
Ah yes, remember when Trump nearly pissed himself when somebody tried to take the stage? Why didn't Trump just put his tough talk into action? He calls himself a supporter of the Second Amendment, so surly he was packing heat! Or is his tough talk just a mask of a man with a crippled and weak ego?
Much as he's an absolute coward, this isn't why people have bodyguards. Muhammad Ali and Mike Tyson had bodyguards when they were the baddest men on the planet. Some lunatic can always come out and cheapshot even real badasses.
 
Would you care to enumerate just what "rants" and "buzzwords" the Republican establishment have used that have given rise to Donald Trump?

There's merit to that point of view- Take what Rubio said a few days ago.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/marco-rubio-donald-trump-obama-2016-3?r=US&IR=T
Remember, Rubio is the candidate who says President Barack Obama is "undermining this country" as "part of a plan to weaken America on the global stage." Rubio says of Obama that "all this damage that he's done to America is deliberate." He attacked the president's choice to speak at a mosque as an example of his "constant pitting people against each other," which is "hurting our country badly."

There's a difference between saying the presidents incompetent or misguided and saying he's intentionally, sadistically damaging america.

We've had 8 years of that now.
 
If you assaulted trump it would just make him stronger.
Anyone contemplating violence against him needs to consider what it would say about us as a species if Donald Trump, of all people, were to become a martyr.

Caravaggio-Crucifixion_of_Peter.jpg
John_Everett_Millais_-_Joan_of_Arc.jpg
Gandhi_smiling.jpg
latest
 
Last edited:
If Trump loses Ohio and wins Florida on Tuesday, he'll be slowed down, but he will still have a chance of obtaining a majority of the delegates. If he wins both, he is relatively likely to receive the nomination. If he loses both, however, it becomes extraordinarily difficult for him to receive a majority, and a contested convention becomes likely. You don't hear about it much in the news because it's based around party rules and varies from state to state, but this is why delegate selection has been so important this cycle. Trump has currently won roughly 44% of delegates, and if this trend continues, he'll be about 160 short of the nomination in Cleveland. If that happens, it's time to break out the popcorn (and I become especially glad that I chose at the last minute to not seek a delegate position).

The Libertarian convention ought to be really interesting this year. Assuming Gary Johnson wins the nomination, and Trump is the Republican nominee, I would strongly consider voting for Johnson. I couldn't vote for John McAfee or Austin Petersen, much less any of the "fringier" Libertarian candidates.
 
@Picklechu the problem is trumps overwhelming lead in Florida and the other tuesdsay states. If current polling holds up he could offset an Ohio loss easily.
 
Now that I've learned that John McAfee is running for president I now support him instead of Bernie.
He declared last year as an independent, and said he wanted to create a new "Cyber Party." At the time, some talk radio host was his running mate. Around Christmas, he realized how delusional it was to run as an independent without being a billionaire, dropped his running mate (at least for now), and declared as a Libertarian.

@Picklechu the problem is trumps overwhelming lead in Florida and the other tuesdsay states. If current polling holds up he could offset an Ohio loss easily.
It's no so much a matter of offsetting a loss as it is of improving his current level of success. For example, at this point last cycle, Romney had already amassed 56% of the delegates distributed. If he doesn't win both, his path becomes obstructed. As it stands, though, he's the only one with any chance whatsoever of getting 1,237 delegates.
 
Trump has currently won roughly 44% of delegates, and if this trend continues, he'll be about 160 short of the nomination in Cleveland. If that happens, it's time to break out the popcorn (and I become especially glad that I chose at the last minute to not seek a delegate position).

Ex-GOP political strategist Roger Stone has some interesting thoughts on how the GOP could rig the process to try to block Trump.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...-how-the-stop-trump-drive-resembles-the-past/
 
There's merit to that point of view- Take what Rubio said a few days ago.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/marco-rubio-donald-trump-obama-2016-3?r=US&IR=T


There's a difference between saying the presidents incompetent or misguided and saying he's intentionally, sadistically damaging america.

We've had 8 years of that now.
As much as I value this in-depth analysis by Mr. Josh Barro, who seems to have taken an interest in putting the blame for Trump on the Republican establishment with whatever reasoning he can muster, I remain quite skeptical of his conclusions. Trump's populist support and the anger and energy that accompanies it, I should think, does not come from Marco Rubio's criticisms of Obama's presidency, nor any such similar comments from other Republican politicians.

The Libertarian convention ought to be really interesting this year. Assuming Gary Johnson wins the nomination, and Trump is the Republican nominee, I would strongly consider voting for Johnson. I couldn't vote for John McAfee or Austin Petersen, much less any of the "fringier" Libertarian candidates.
You mean you don't see Derrick Michael Reid as a viable candidate for the presidency?
DMRflag.jpg
 
More polling

View attachment 77708

Trump has a commanding lead in florida. It looks like little marco is about to get trumped.

Ohio is a nominal tie that could go either way now.
Hoping Kasich gets Ohio, especially if it means Trump doesn't win Ohio.
I just hope this doesn't become Trump versus Clinton (since I am pretty damn sure Clinton's going to be the Democratic nominee at this point).
For the Republicans I'm pretty much hoping for anyone but Trump to get the nomination (though personally I would definitely prefer Kasich or Rubio over Cruz). If it's Clinton versus any of the other Republican candidates, I am probably going to be voting for the Republican candidate (even if it ends up being Ted Cruz).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom