MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election  Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused    Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
wants to rule a country that's going down the toilet.
We're not going down the toilet... we can go that way but mostly that's a narrative we've been sold by people who want to keep us cheap and desperate. We're a country that's very rich and comfortable and is now pissing it's pants in the face of the slightest adversity. Look a graph of just about anything from the past 60 years... hell 100 years. Now look at our current insignificant rash of pessimism in comparison. Please look I'm not making this up.
If we go in the toilet it's our fault america is a very strong country by almost any measure.
 
I disagree. I think there are some similarities there. Not to say I think that Trump is going to gas all the Muslims/Mexicans or invade Canada, but there are some similarities.
  • The whole "Make America Great Again" is similar to the platform the National Socialists used.
  • As is him attacking other groups for Americas problems, like the Democrats and the Mexicans.
  • Appealing to the lowest denominator.
None of these things are new or particular to Trump, though. If you're going to make serious comparisons to Hitler, you need to find some comparisons that touch on what made Hitler unique, or at least unusual. Otherwise you might as well point out that Hitler and Trump both have two legs, two arms and a head.

It's true Hitler did all the things you've mentioned, but politicians have been doing some combination of them, in democratic, quasi-democratic and non-democratic systems, since long before anybody had ever heard of Hitler. If you want to get to what makes Hitler the secular satan, you need to go beyond fairly generic (if unpleasant) stuff like outgroup scapegoating, bellicose nationalism and dumbing down policy debate. Again, none of these things are anything that we are required to tolerate. But at the same time it's possible to realise there is a middle ground between "totally fine" and "basically Hitler".

If we view bellicose nationalism and persecutionary politics as a spectrum where Hitler is a 10, Trump is a 5 or maybe a 6. Which don't get me wrong, is plenty to worry about. But most politicians are somewhere on that spectrum, including the ones you support. "Make [our country] great again" is a sentiment that almost every politician has expressed in its essence at some point in their career.
 
Or Santorum. That man HORRIFIES me. He literally said he would get rid of birth control. If that's not an invasion of privacy then I don't know what is!

"Frothy" Santorum is a cheap amateur when it comes to Cruz. There's so much Hell On Earth that this "man" and his buddies want to inflict on America; executing gays/atheists/minorities Holocaust-style, mandatory christian prayers in schools (don't care if you're Jewish or whatever, on your knees and pray to Republican JAY-ZUSS!!), mandatory tithing, abolition of Social Security/Health Department/IRS/HUD, mandatory school classes to worship the rich as if they were "the chosen", etc.. Like something straight out of "The Handmaid's Tale".

And THAT is the guy what the establishment faction wants to nominate instead of Trump. *shiver*

Living in a Trump America might be something out of Mussolini's Italy, but I'd rather have that then the neo-Dark Ages that Ayatollah Cruz wants to impose on us.

Is Hilary the embodiment of Mussolini? Discuss.

No.

Well, I've been told I'm a racist a few times. Once was for using the word "minority" in a mathematical way. Turns out black people own that word. Is it any wonder people vote for a racist when so many have that label put upon them?

DING DING DING! We have a winner! Trump's campaign is one huge backlash against the SJW/BLM bullshit of the past few years. Trump's polling numbers had always taken a spike upwards every time there was some fresh pantsload of shenanigans coming out of Mizzou. These BLM dumbshits demanded that that at every campus meeting, there would be some time set aside for every white person to publicly apologize for being white, fer fucksakes. You don't have to be some 80 year old geezer watching Fox News to feel outraged by that!
 
Last edited:
That's funny because you've never seemed anything less than utterly disgusted by the Democrats since long before Bernie Sanders was anything more than the quirky senator from Vermont
And I should feel otherwise for what reason, again?

I don't watch Sargon, but I know he's somewhat respected(?). I wasn't sure if this was relevant or not, but it was a rather spergy piece.
The biggest red flag for cultism is when people lose their sense of humor. I've seen this exact same behavior towards Trump from Mr. Metokur and Razorfist. They so desperately want Trump to be the antidote our nation needs that they veer into a mad frenzy the moment someone points out the obvious: the emperor is as naked as the day he was born.

He is also very pro-military. . .
All American politicians are pro-military, and more importantly, pro-military industrial complex. It's the reason why they're simultaneously so strategically inept, and offer bipartisan and unanimous support to the only projects on Planet Earth which waste money at a clip of tens of billions with no completion date in site.

It'd take no time at all to resolve our nation's financial issues if the government finally put a stop to this insanity, and it's also the least likely reform we'll see in our lifetimes since this issue's actually been getting worse every decade for over half a century regardless of what conflicts our nation's been involved in.

. . .and like any conservative, he tends to be into government getting extremely involved in our personal lives (defunding Planned Parenthood, for instance; I would prefer that man to stay out of my ovaries). In my opinion, once we start getting into taking away reproductive rights, that opens a whole can of worms where the government is suddenly able to tell us what we can and cannot do with our bodies, and how many children we are to have, etc. It is a slippery slope.
Trump isn't, by any definition, even remotely conservative on any issue, including abortion and Planned Parenthood. He's the only Republican candidate who overtly supports the organization. And much like how Clinton campaigned on repealing the ban on gays in the military but swiftly put his pen to both The Defense of Marriage Act and "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" once in the Oval Office to rob his opponents of a campaign issue, Trump will immediately make his own tilt to "the enemy's" side on abortion for the exact same purposes. The Democrats, much like the Republicans under Clinton, will serve simultaneously as opponents and allies for every political issue.

Hell, I'll call it right now: If elected, during his second term, Trump will put his pen to legislation which will give Planned Parenthood ironclad funding in perpetuity upon passage of the act by Congressional Democrats. Or some other equally cynical boon to the pro-abortion crowd to take the wind out of his opponent's sails.

sure, maybe Trump isn't actual Hitler (no shit), but he is definitely scarily close in his political ideals, and I would rather a man of that type stay the fuck out of the White House.
This is easily where they're furthest apart. Hitler actually had political ideals; something no one can even kinda say about Trump.

The point where The Hairpiece and The Führer are actually similar is in their cruelty, their anger, their greed, their narcissism, their lust for power, and their authoritarianism. This will be a problem no matter what issues Trump supports, and is the main reason why I despise the motherfucker.

1980 to 2016. That's 36 years of Republicans saying America is shit.
To be fair, America was incredibly shitty by the end of the 70s.

There were many factors other than the fact that Carter was a crappy President. Clinton was both a crappy President and as a person was outright evil, but the 90s was still a great decade for the US. But the Carter administration, and the two previous administrations before him which were part of what Reagan was running against, were certainly part of the problem.
 
And I should feel otherwise for what reason, again?

I'm not saying you should feel any particular way. It's just that the post in question implied, to me at least, that you'd been open-minded about the Democrats until Sanders not winning the nomination pushed you into utter disgust. Which doesn't really line up with your previously stated views.
 
I'm not saying you should feel any particular way. It's just that the post in question implied, to me at least, that you'd been open-minded about the Democrats until Sanders not winning the nomination pushed you into utter disgust. Which doesn't really line up with your previously stated views.
True, I've given plenty of shit to the Democrats in the past and will continue to do so in the future. But when they don't run crooks like Hillary or Emmanuel, or don't display a noxious combination of naïvité and cynicism like Obama and Carter, I'm happy supporting them. I would be happy voting for an FDR, an LBJ, a Wilson or a Sanders. I'd vote for Romney if I could go back in time to 2012, but if I were allowed to vote at the time, I'd pick Obama over McCain in '08.
 
Romney's leaked speech

CcnlZqmW4AEJa7y.jpg
Ccnn-VLW4AAydJV.jpg


CcnsAh1UUAAIWwg.jpg
CcnsIV3UAAAZUlO.jpg


Why the fuck would anyone listen to mitt Romney now?

GOP primary voter: "Why should I take the advice of someone who lost to Obummer?" and "This guy is proving trump right"

He didn't even endorse another primary contender. Whats the point of this.
 
John McCain chimed in and told primary voters not to support trump.

Nice to see the GOP trotting out yesterdays losers
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vladimir Putin is a far more apt comparison for Donald Drumpf than Hitler.

Both are narcissistic egomaniacs whose relentless self-promotion, based entirely on absurd, outrageous lies, is mindlessly echoed by a compliant "news" media that exists only to sell advertisements and to substitute artificially-flavored pasteurized process news product for actual news.

As common as it is to blame the GOP for Trump, as Harry Reid just did, the real culprits are the impostors posing as journalists who run our media, the mindless stenographers who will repeat utterly outrageous lies like Trump's claims of vast wealth, which are based on ideas like just being named "Trump" puts $3 billion more on his fictional net worth (which is not how "net worth" works).

Of course, like the Hitler comparison, it breaks down once you start comparing their actual competence. Putin, while scum, is a highly competent executive with extensive experience. Trump is a guy whose entire business model consists of selling his name to people of dubious judgment, then funneling as much money out of the joint venture into his own pockets as possible before strategically declaring bankruptcy, leaving his duped co-investors holding the bag. If the business somehow succeeds despite his bungling and mismanagement, it's free money.
 
"Conservative Policies" are not for "Lifting people out of poverty". It makes as much sense as treating a sunburn with napalm.
I don't believe any government policies are lifting Americans out of poverty.
I dunno, maybe a quantum computer robot that is finely attuned to the need s of all Americans needs to be invented. The level of self-serving interests (ego) is just too influential in all forms of government.
 
Vladimir Putin is a far more apt comparison for Donald Drumpf than Hitler.

Both are narcissistic egomaniacs whose relentless self-promotion, based entirely on absurd, outrageous lies, is mindlessly echoed by a compliant "news" media that exists only to sell advertisements and to substitute artificially-flavored pasteurized process news product for actual news.

As common as it is to blame the GOP for Trump, as Harry Reid just did, the real culprits are the impostors posing as journalists who run our media, the mindless stenographers who will repeat utterly outrageous lies like Trump's claims of vast wealth, which are based on ideas like just being named "Trump" puts $3 billion more on his fictional net worth (which is not how "net worth" works).

Of course, like the Hitler comparison, it breaks down once you start comparing their actual competence. Putin, while scum, is a highly competent executive with extensive experience. Trump is a guy whose entire business model consists of selling his name to people of dubious judgment, then funneling as much money out of the joint venture into his own pockets as possible before strategically declaring bankruptcy, leaving his duped co-investors holding the bag. If the business somehow succeeds despite his bungling and mismanagement, it's free money.
Putin and Trump are somewhat similar, but I still wouldn't say it's really an accurate comparison. Putin came in to power by manipulating a group of oligarchs (the Kremlin Family) who wanted a puppet to act as an extension of the extremely corrupt Yeltsin regime which had allowed them to thrive. After having exploited their trust and resources to take power, Putin betrayed them and seized control of Boris Berezovsky's media empire, which he has since used for an extensive and ongoing propaganda campaign.
Putin is cunning. His plan to seize power was very clever, and he had every advantage.
Trump has risen despite a massive media campaign against him, and despite the GOP establishment doing everything in their power to stop him. Trump has defied the expectations of the world. He's taken the GOP by storm without a clever plan, and without any meaningful outside support. The only advantage Trump has is a little bit of name recognition. His rise is truly unprecedented.
Their policy is similar, but Trump's rise is virtually the opposite of Putin's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom