MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election  Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused    Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Honestly, I'm pretty sure that's going to end up being the race.

Can't wait for all the dank memes that'll be cooked up. "The only way to stump the Trump is to make it Bern." and shit.

Bernie has a tough couple states ahead. For instance, Hillary is almost certainly going to win South Carolina.
 
Well, this is easily the worst article I've read on the election from a writer I like:

http://www.slate.com/articles/techn...d_ceaseless_and_kind_of_sexist_just_like.html

Amanda Hess said:
But whatever. A successful meme doesn’t stick to facts. It riffs off a vibe. Bernie registers as passionate and authentic, Hillary comes across as pandering and robotic, and those assessments are very sticky. When New York magazine’s Rembert Browne asked Sanders to name his favorite David Bowie song at Fusion’s January Brown and Black Democratic Presidential Forum, Sanders replied, “I know he passed away, and the answer is that I wasn’t much of a follower of his.” Weeks later, Bernie closed an Iowa speech to the tune of “Starman,” and Newsweek raved that the choice “felt sincere.” Close readers of Bernie’s musical tastes know it was as calculated as any other candidate’s pandering playlist, but it “feels” sincere because Bernie feels sincere.
This is literally the same shit people were, deservedly, giving John Kerry back in '04; Mitt Romney back in 2012; and Richard Nixon for his entire career. If someone's a greedy, corporate bloodsucker who'll say absolutely anything for short-term political gain and every attempt they've ever made to replicate human emotion comes across as less authentic than the Coneheads: they should be called out on it no matter what they have in their underwear.
 
Artist Illma Gore has rendered a stunning likeness of Dear Leader, fit for His official presidential portrait.
CrTa8G3.jpg
 
Ah!

I see that, unlike the last state, nobody wants to know my "thoughts"

Honestly, what is there i can say about Trump right now? Its funny how the MSM gloated about Marco's third last week.....

KASICH WON SECOND IN NH!!!

This fact, incredibly surprising to me, spells significant doom for the Dems.

If Trump picks Kasich as his VP, thats it. Done. Cemented. All hail Great America.
 
Ah!

I see that, unlike the last state, nobody wants to know my "thoughts"

Honestly, what is there i can say about Trump right now? Its funny how the MSM gloated about Marco's third last week.....

KASICH WON SECOND IN NH!!!

This fact, incredibly surprising to me, spells significant doom for the Dems.

If Trump picks Kasich as his VP, thats it. Done. Cemented. All hail Great America.
I would hope that Kasich has enough integrity to say no.
(Also, you're still assuming Trump gets the nomination. Rubio and/or Cruz seem pretty likely.)

In other news, Fiorina and Christie are out. There is a loving deity.
 
I learned a lot about Donald Trump today.

I still wont vote for him, but up to this point I thought he was just a racist demagogue who catered to the extreme right, which actually seems to be a great way to get ahead in politics these days. Earlier today I saw news about a new satirical movie about Trump pop up on my Facebook timeline.

I thought it was funny and well done, but the idea that Trump wrote (or rather, hired a reporter to write it for him) a "how to get rich" book in the 80s fascinated me, and with all the hype around him today it might be fascinating to take a peek into the mind of a man I now hear about all the time on the news.

I found a copy online and read it earlier today. While I still don't agree with what he's doing, I do now understand what he's doing.

The book isn't very long and contains a "Week in the Life of Trump" section, an 11-step guide to "getting what you want" and his life story up through 1985. Most of the book is a kind of passive bragging; Trump jokes about making $50 million deals for casinos in New Jersey like they're nothing. Bragging is so ingrained in the man's psyche that he does it simply by talking, whether he's conscious of it or not. He's also ruthless, and knows exactly how create controversy in order to get free publicity, kind of like how he's running his campaign for president.

I'll share a few select quotes to show what I mean.

He pretty much explains his entire life strategy here:

You can have the most wonderful product in the world, but if people don’t know about it,
it’s not going to be worth much. There are singers in the world with
voices as good as Frank Sinatra’s, but they’re singing in their garages because
no one has ever heard of them. You need to generate interest, and you need to
create excitement. One way is to hire public relations people and pay them a lot
of money to sell whatever you’ve got. But to me, that’s like hiring outside
consultants to study a market. It’s never as good as doing it yourself.
One thing I’ve learned about the press is that they’re always hungry for a good
story, and the more sensational the better. It’s in the nature of the job, and I
understand that. The point is that if you are a little different, or a little
outrageous, or if you do things that are bold or controversial, the press is going
to write about you. I’ve always done things a little differently, I don’t mind
controversy, and my deals tend to be somewhat ambitious. Also, I achieved a lot
when I was very young, and I chose to live in a certain style. The result is that the
press has always wanted to write about me.

He offers a great little lesson on Demagogy 101 here:

The final key to the way I promote is bravado. I play to people’s fantasies. People
may not always think big themselves, but they can still get very excited by those
who do. That’s why a little hyperbole never hurts. People want to believe that
something is the biggest and the greatest and the most spectacular.
I call it truthful hyperbole. It’s an innocent form of exaggeration—and a very
effective form of promotion.

From the "Day in the Life" segment:

5:15 P.M. I call Henry Kanegsberg, the NBC executive in charge of choosing a
new site for the network’s headquarters. We’ve been courting NBC for more than
a year, trying to get them to move to our West Side yards site—seventy-eight
acres along the Hudson River that I bought a year ago and on which I’ve
announced plans to build the world’s tallest building.
I know Henry has just been shown our latest plans for the site, and I’m following
up. I mention that Bloomingdale’s is dying to become the anchor store in our
shopping center, which will give it real prestige. I also tell him the city seems
very excited about our latest plans. Then I say we expect to get our preliminary
approvals in the next several months.
Kanegsberg seems enthusiastic. Before I get off, I also put in a plug for NBC’s
locating its offices in the world’s tallest building. “Think about it,” I say. “It’s the
ultimate symbol.”

This man is a master manipulator. His ego is already astronomical and I feel the presidential run is more of an attempt to stroke that ego than really a desire to run the country. Even if he doesn't win, the promotion of his name around the world he gets just by running is worth it to him.
 
They won't say this out loud but Bernie's campaign will be satisfied if they can keep Hilary's win in South Carolina to a relatively modest margin.

If she actually loses it would be catastrophic. The problem is the primary/caucus system and the convention is basically rigged, with Hillary guaranteed a large chunk of the so-called "superdelegates" who get to ignore the popular vote and just cast their already purchased votes for Hillary.
 
If she actually loses it would be catastrophic. The problem is the primary/caucus system and the convention is basically rigged, with Hillary guaranteed a large chunk of the so-called "superdelegates" who get to ignore the popular vote and just cast their already purchased votes for Hillary.

This was the problem back in 2008, too. Hillary had all the super delegates, but Obama had the popular support. The superdelegates were created to prevent a Mondale or McGovern from taking victory. If the majority of their base sees the race as rigged for Hillary, they either not turn out in the election or start finding a Republican they can support. (There is a lot of overlap between Bernie and Trump supporters)

It is a catch-22 for the democratic party. Also, the Goldman Sachs ties could be a real problem. Especially if things worsen and they need another bailout. People take the economic situation lightly, but this is almost 2008 all over again - just twisted a bit. The same type of derivative products that nuked things still exist and if anything are even more widespread now.

A lot of people saw banks get bailed out and their neighbors foreclosed(in some cases illegally without due process) by the bailed out bankers "worried about moral hazard".
 
(Also, you're still assuming Trump gets the nomination. Rubio and/or Cruz seem pretty likely.)

You know that there is a reason and a point for why Iowa, NH and SC gets so much focus, right?

Cruz, yes. He still has a chance and will keep it if he wins SC.

But Marco needs to get back his footing. If he can win a surpise upset in SC, that would make the whole GOP race more unpredicatble.
 
If Trump decides to listen to his ego and pull a Ross Perot, Dems are gonna win for sure, if he gets the republican nomination, dems will win for sure, if the republicans pick someone else, the dems will win for sure.....why are we discussing an election we already know the answer to? 12 years of SJW
 
This was the problem back in 2008, too. Hillary had all the super delegates, but Obama had the popular support. The superdelegates were created to prevent a Mondale or McGovern from taking victory.

While I sympathize with the general idea, what that basically amounts to is they created it to prevent democracy.
 
He also had a powerful, well-known Democrat back him who could go against the Clintons' influence (Ted Kennedy), which Sanders doesn't have.

Very true. Still, Hillary's whole thing is "being able to win". If the entire large swaths of the Democratic Base(Younger voters and working poor) hate her for upending their clearest most assertive voice for their vision for the country via a clearly rigged primary system, the republicans will win. Throw in a likely financial collapse with the bailouts likely to happen again, it creates a recipe for a chaotic election. Some Dems might defect on Hillary like they did before. Also the FBI stuff is beginning to look serious too. That could severely weaken her before the primaries are up. Say what you want about Bernie, but at least he does not have an active Federal Investigation going on about negligently handling potentially classified government material.

Hillary's only hope may eventually be Elizabeth Warren which would of course really infuriate Wall Street. At this point Hillary has no credibility with a large section of the Democratic Base.

While I sympathize with the general idea, what that basically amounts to is they created it to prevent democracy.

Sadly it does and it could backfire on them. The irony of the Democratic Party being un-democratic is not lost on me or a few other Americans.

I like the Republican Primary system better. More honest, more open for better or worse. The republicans don't have a system in place that makes it so you really only have to garner the support of an enclaved political system. The Iowa Caucus's were rigged by Robertson to favor evangelical candidates, but even it can wind up bucking the party leadership. The democrats don't allow that to happen.


As for the other side - I personally favor Bush or Kasich. Both are governors and know how to manage something. Cruz is an opportunist who will lie and do anything to get power for his own self aggrandizement and Rubio seems more like a overprotected kid to me. Trump is Sanders in the mirror rightly. I like that Trump makes the donor class worried. Trump does manage a multi-million dollar real estate empire, but I really don't think it will be that easy for to deal with the public sector.
 
Still, Hillary's whole thing is "being able to win". If the entire large swaths of the Democratic Base(Younger voters and working poor) hate her for upending their clearest most assertive voice for their vision for the country via a clearly rigged primary system, the republicans will win. Throw in a likely financial collapse with the bailouts likely to happen again, it creates a recipe for a chaotic election. Some Dems might defect on Hillary like they did before.
Many Democrats who are either part of the younger generation or the white working class are likely going to vote for Trump if he wins the Republican nomination. Hillary winning the Democratic nomination, which seems to be a foregone conclusion, would alienate those voters except in the most dyed-in-the-wool blue states that weren't dependent on heavy industry in recent memory. If Sanders did in fact win the nomination, most of the younger voters would go for him, but the older white working class Democrats would still go for Trump, possibly in fewer numbers, because of his support for tariffs, in addition to his opposition to illegal immigration.

Trump is Sanders in the mirror rightly. I like that Trump makes the donor class worried. Trump does manage a multi-million dollar real estate empire, but I really don't think it will be that easy for to deal with the public sector.
He might be incompetent as an individual businessman, but if he knows how to do anything it's finding effective subordinates.
 
Many Democrats who are either part of the younger generation or the white working class are likely going to vote for Trump if he wins the Republican nomination. Hillary winning the Democratic nomination, which seems to be a foregone conclusion, would alienate those voters except in the most dyed-in-the-wool blue states that weren't dependent on heavy industry in recent memory. If Sanders did in fact win the nomination, most of the younger voters would go for him, but the older white working class Democrats would still go for Trump, possibly in fewer numbers, because of his support for tariffs, in addition to his opposition to illegal immigration.

Pretty much. That is the true irony of it all. If Hillary wins by rigging it, the Dems will lose in November. Hillary is the poison pill for the Dems.

If Trump or Sanders are on the other side then we might have a strong contest. If both are bumped and we have a Cruz vs Hillary battle, then I think this election will break low turnout records. A lot of people just won't vote. Cruz and Hillary are embody the problem with American Politics to most people.

He might be incompetent as an individual businessman, but if he knows how to do anything it's finding effective subordinates.

That Trump does. He knows how to bring in experts and effective managers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom