Might have something to do with the RNC stacking the crowd with people to boo Trump, even on stuff he agrees with absolutely everybody else on stage about.
Might have something to do with the RNC stacking the crowd with people to boo Trump, even on stuff he agrees with absolutely everybody else on stage about.
Donald Trump should be booed at any time for any reason by everybody, even on stuff he agrees with everybody else about. It's a matter of principle, like something The Hairpiece wouldn't do at all in his marriages.
Donald Trump should be booed at any time for any reason by everybody, even on stuff he agrees with everybody else about. It's a matter of principle, like something The Hairpiece wouldn't do at all in his marriages.
Regarding Clinton and young voters, I think a Clinton candidacy could go a long ways toward lowering voter turnout among young people, a demographic Democrats rely on to win elections.
Obama probably wouldn't have won in either of his elections without inspiring young voters to come out and vote. Hilary's problem is that these young liberal voters don't like her, and all the money and superdelegates on earth won't do a damn thing to change that. She is uncharismatic, unlikable, and is far more a moderate than a liberal. Young voters are idealistic, and they likely won't care to even go out to vote for someone who is universally perceived as little more than slightly left of center.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=uafScAiaC44
Might have something to do with the RNC stacking the crowd with people to boo Trump, even on stuff he agrees with absolutely everybody else on stage about.
What is wrong with Jeb, I can't believe he can even show his face in this election knowing that he's a bigger flop than his semi-retarded brother
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/201...mises-beat-expectations-new-hampshire-n513221
In a new article Jeb promises to beat expectations in NH
It's like Chris going into a public space and saying to himself, instead of directly antagonizing female strangers, I'll just make forced and weird contact with them instead, that will show em' that I'm not autistic
Obama probably wouldn't have won in either of his elections without inspiring young voters to come out and vote. Hilary's problem is that these young liberal voters don't like her, and all the money and superdelegates on earth won't do a damn thing to change that.
"All" a Democratic candidate has to do to win is to keep the Obama voting coalition together. Obama won based on high turnout from young voters and ethnic minorities, both groups with historically low turnout. If those two groups vote in large numbers, added to the Democrat's 'traditional' voting base of blue collar workers and urban 'liberals', you've got an unbeatable electoral combo.
The problem is that both Sanders and Clinton will have difficulty maintaining that coalition - Clinton will have a hard time getting the young into the voting booth, Sanders will have a similarly hard time getting minorities in.
I was watching some low-budget paid programming about precious metals investing and they wasted a good five minutes or so gushing about how awesome Vermin Supreme is.
The problem is that both Sanders and Clinton will have difficulty maintaining that coalition - Clinton will have a hard time getting the young into the voting booth, Sanders will have a similarly hard time getting minorities in.
It's hard to imagine an election where it would make more strategic sense for the winner to choose the loser as VP. (Never mind that it's very unlikely to happen.)
It's hard to imagine an election where it would make more strategic sense for the winner to choose the loser as VP. (Never mind that it's very unlikely to happen.)
That was a thing in the Constitution at the time. It was modeled after the executive branch of the Roman Republic, where you had two consuls of equal power who would rule jointly and, ideally, cancel out each other's dictatorial aspirations.
It's hard to imagine an election where it would make more strategic sense for the winner to choose the loser as VP. (Never mind that it's very unlikely to happen.)
I couldn't blame either of them for rejecting it - both of them seem like they'd both find the experience of being Vice President extremely frustrating, albeit for different reasons. The people who flourish in the role are usually older cynics who've been in Washington for ages and who use it as a sort of "honorary chairman" type role before retiring, like Biden or Cheney, and younger up-and-comers who are prepping for the Presidency, like Gore and Bush Snr.
