MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
The Trumpers simultaneously tell us that Putin dindu nuffin we need to be good friends and also he's a psychopath hellbent on WWIII.

Putin and Clinton are power-hungry opportunists, not suicidal idiots. We're not going to see WWIII, we're not going to get into a shooting war any more than Reagan and Gorby wanted to get into a war.
 
Hillary and Putin are nothing if not concerned with their legacies, Nobody wants to be the guy who pushed the nuclear button first. We'll bicker, argue and proxy war, but nothing more.
 
Skeealator said:
...besides, I thought you and Trump wanted to be BFFs with Putin? What's the worry?
Click to expand...

The worry is Clinton wants to establish a No-Fly Zone over parts of Syria that will strain US-Russian relationships even further, and for what? Is it really worth it to help out the rebels in Syria and risk Russian aggression towards the USA? What benefit does the USA get out of establishing and policing a No-Fly Zone? Why is it Clinton's priority?

https://twitter.com/ed_hooley/status/786977865296293888?s=04

As Jan_Hus says above, this likely will not devolve into a nuclear war, but why must we perpetuate the Cold War funding these proxy wars? What benefit is the USA getting out of it?
 
Nukes are also not weapons of war (as Trump thinks, he literally asked Chris Matthews why we couldn't use nukes) they are diplomatic tools. If one is ever used, it means something has gone horribly, horribly wrong.
 
Techpriest said:
Yes, like I dunno, getting to mars or solving world hunger.
Click to expand...
Hey if we have another Cold War (with a Space Race), we might actually get to Mars. We might all be mutated radiation monsters, but we'll get there.

Jan_Hus said:
Nukes are also not weapons of war (as Trump thinks, he literally asked Chris Matthews why we couldn't use nukes) they are diplomatic tools. If one is ever used, it means something has gone horribly, horribly wrong.
Click to expand...
True. I don't know why any country would actually use them. Just one could fuck us all, even the one who shot it. Mutually assured destruction pretty much prevents anything like that from happening. I hope.
 
Okay so this whole Media bias for Clinton and Clinton supporters from Day 1 has been increasingly becoming more and more disturbing to me.

The whole Pepe thing is funny but also kinda shows how much sway she already has. Her entire fucking campaign seems to be solely focused on tokenism and Fear mongering and it's fucking working according to the polls.

She keeps talking about how trump is a warmongering idiot that will lead us to Nuclear Devastation, while at the same time stating her plans to go to war with a nuclear superpower over rumors of them Leaking her emails involving dubiously illegal activities.

She keeps talking about how Trump supporters are "race baiting neo-nazi deplorables" or whatever while simultaneously consistently emphasizing for minorities to to vote for her instead of just "all people".

She keeps talking about fighting ISIS while constantly backing BLM, who prominent figures from recent "peaceful protests" Time and time again Have stated their open support of ISIS.
She also had a hand in the creation of ISIS although that wasn't an intentional thing as it was multiple bad decisions by our government as a whole that lead to the formation of ISIS.

I haven't seen any Trump supporters form fanatical legitimate "anti Hillary" crusades where they attempt to destroy and/or vandalize everything and anything with a Hilary 2016 logo on it yet. The worst I've seen is them posting offensive memes.

Lets not forget that guy that literally posted on social media when and how he was gonna try and assassinate trump wasn't even stopped until he finally got close enough to try to do it him. Say "I'm gonna assasinate Hillary Clinton" on twitter and see how long it is till you get banned and/or arrested for "potential terrorist activity"

You have these massive anti-trump things in the media right now like "trek against Trump"
The news goes to insane lengths to remove pro Trump stuff, and the fucking Debates constantly Cut off The crowd every time they cheered for trump, But not for Hillary. I live in an incredibly Left Wing area and I
haven't seen many Hillary supporters as I have people confused and angry at the Media bias.

I don't give a shit whether people like or Dislike Trump. I've seen amazingly shit come from both sides Please note I mean the people who aren't just taking it to the streets to crusade against Trump and burn effigies of him and the US flag. (though the recordings of that are unintentionally hilarious in an incredibly sad way)

A strong third party Candidate could have potentially made it much less likely for both Trump and Clinton to become president, but we Know what happened to the Only other popular candidate aside from trump that promised to run third party if they didn't get a main party nomination.

This shit is fucking spookier than any Horror novel and I just wanna escape but I can't. And I sure as hell can't fight it by voting because Even if Trump wins the actual majority vote it will mean jack shit because the Electoral colleges are already probably gonna override it for "H-dog" anyway.
It won't stop me though.

Beaniebon said:
Hey if we have another Cold War (with a Space Race), we might actually get to Mars. We might all be mutated radiation monsters, but we'll get there.


True. I don't know why any country would actually use them. Just one could fuck us all, even the one who shot it. Mutually assured destruction pretty much prevents anything like that from happening. I hope.
Click to expand...
The thing is People are freaked out over the Hilary vs. Russia thing because She'd probably be the first to fire the nukes over something incredibly stupid.
 
Last edited:
^I think the media bias towards Clinton is kinda gross and a big part if not the sole reason she's winning.

I wish there was a way to fix that, but the only thing that might help is if government regulations took them down and instead had a non bias, government run news center that releases straight up news (with no talk shows, panels, round the clock coverage, ect. and instead presented the facts and made people come to their own conclusions/feelings on things).

But even then there is no way to get rid of bias. It might be better than party run news networks that host the debates and are the number one source of information that runs all day.
 
Beaniebon said:
Hey if we have another Cold War (with a Space Race), we might actually get to Mars. We might all be mutated radiation monsters, but we'll get there.


True. I don't know why any country would actually use them. Just one could fuck us all, even the one who shot it. Mutually assured destruction pretty much prevents anything like that from happening. I hope.
Click to expand...
MAD as a force isn't really what does it anymore, as most nuclear nations have less than five hundred warheads. It isn't mutually assured destruction when most of the nation survives.
 
Beaniebon said:
I wish there was a way to fix that,
Click to expand...
There isn't, outside of consumer revolts. We've got what we've got for now and they are rapidly strangling both political discourse and themselves. I don't see a positive change happening before the Boomers die off.
 
Oh Long Johnson said:
There isn't, outside of consumer revolts. We've got what we've got for now and they are rapidly strangling both political discourse and themselves. I don't see a positive change happening before the Boomers die off.
Click to expand...
Not that many people care about how biased the media is. The only people I've meet who have given a damn have been on the internet. irl most people are pretty complacent with it or don't even recognize it. There won't be a revolt anytime soon. Unfortunately we probably will have to wait for the Boomers to die off and news stations have to shut down because no one watches.
 
Beaniebon said:
I wish there was a way to fix that, but the only thing that might help is if government regulations took them down and instead had a non bias, government run news center that releases straight up news
Click to expand...

The issue is the government regulations would shut down any person running against Clinton and put out biased, lie-laced news because the current President is actively campaigning for her and so are many others she has connections to.

It would quickly become Gerrymandering, but in the form of controlling the news instead of the lines.
 
I find it remarkable that so many former Bernie voters are buying into the "anti-globalism = anti-semitism" lie being pushed right now by the mainstream media, considering Bernie voters would have been going HAM over Wikileaks if they had dropped back in March.

Seriously, after Podesta Emails, it's not an inaccurate statement at all to say "Hillary Clinton meets with international banks in secret to plot the destruction of US sovereignty". She's a confirmed North American Unionist, or worse.
 
Shugo said:
The issue is the government regulations would shut down any person running against Clinton and put out biased, lie-laced news because the current President is actively campaigning for her and so are many others she has connections to.
Click to expand...
I meant more like regulations that would make news stations be unable to be affiliated with any politicians/parties (like CNN and the Democratic Party are monetarily affiliated). Simple, easy to spot things that would apply across the board. It wouldn't be run by politicians, but maybe by something similar to the FDA. As for the government run news network, you're right, I suppose. I was being very optimistic on that one. I though the UK had a gov. run news that worked well but I may have just misunderstood something.

I'm not very knowledgeable on things like that. Just something I thought up.

MikePence said:
I find it remarkable that so many former Bernie voters are buying into the "anti-globalism = anti-semitism" lie being pushed right now by the mainstream media, considering Bernie voters would have been going HAM over Wikileaks if they had dropped back in March.
Click to expand...
There are many who are (maybe I just look in unconventional places, though). Most have bought into the "Trump is literally a nazi, she's the lesser of two evils!!" bullshit which apparently means scandals by Clinton are irrelevant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom