March 21st Jihad attack on Brussels

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Male Idiot said:
Marvin, I have to say that perhaps the years of Chris's presence has rubbed off a little bit of naive on you. I'm sorry to offend you like this.

I know that the USA is mighty, and that it will not be an easy target like Europe.

Your opinion on great American Freedom is your very right, I just don't think it is true. But than again I have a very cynical and nihilistic view of people. Could be I'm wrong or we are both wrong, so lets agree to disagree.
Click to expand...
Not offended. I would just disagree that I'm naive. Have you seen the Wire? Excellent television show. Highly recommended. It's about my city.
Male Idiot said:
I was talking more about the Visegrad countries than Russia, but let me quote a security expert from TV ( I know, tv is not reliable) "If they (muslims) did that in Russia, they would have been shot on the streets."
Which is what I think why Russia has no such troubles, as they are a brutal dictatorship.
Anyway I was talking about the former soviet countries that declined to allow migrants in and are thus kebab free and don't suffer their depredations. I think there is a valid link between islamic migrants and terrorism/rape, and the situation seems to be proving me right.
Click to expand...
I think the "dictatorship" part helps, but by and large, I think the biggest help is that Russia knows what they're capable of tolerating. From what I saw, Russia tolerates Muslims just fine. Just so long as they behave themselves.

Oh, and there certainly is a connection between muslims and rape. Many of these migrants are barbarians. But the point I want to make is: that it's not all of them. Also that it's possible to (approximately) separate the barbarians from the ones that will generally behave themselves.

It's a good idea to try to do that. Although, admittedly, that can be difficult if you don't have the resources. I don't really blame smaller countries for fucking up on this issue, so much as I blame the larger countries like Germany. They have no excuse for not doing their homework.
Male Idiot said:
I know a few thousand lives matter not to the USA and its citizens. Your country is huge, rich and has plenty of children. Our entire population is half of that of New York city's, and what we have had for the last few decades was corruption and nepotism under the glory of democracy and freedom. Recent statistics say that the US looses 2,5 million citizens a year, that's 1/4 of all hungarians.
I do not wish to devalue the lives of all American citizens, but the country itself can take casaulities that would devastate most european nation and shrug it off easily, like the mighty industrial juggernaut it is.
Click to expand...
Fair enough.
Male Idiot said:
Forgive me if this does not give me fond memories of it. So yes, a few thousand lives will be well worth it, and if I have to give up some privilages to save my fellow people, it would be selfish of me not to give up a few privilages for it.
Click to expand...
It's not that you shouldn't ever have to give up privileges. Like, things like a "state of emergency" exist, and that's completely fine. But I just think you should be very cautious about things like that.
 
Marvin said:
Oh, go for it. Just saying, enjoy your decades of dictatorships. Are the few thousand lives saved going to be worth a generation of oppression?
Click to expand...
I would be perfectly fine with a right wing military dictatorship because the SJWs are already oppressive enough that a military dictatorship will likely be an improvement.
 
autisticdragonkin said:
I would be perfectly fine with a right wing military dictatorship because the SJWs are already oppressive enough that a military dictatorship will likely be an improvement.
Click to expand...

Let's see.

Fundamental Islamic Terrorists: extremely homophobic, astonishingly anti-intellectual, considers women to be little more than livestock, prone to shoot/blow up anyone who disagrees with them (9/11, Paris, Brussels) fanatically religiously devoted to what is basically a folk tale (The Koran), and are fond of using black/grey propaganda & cherry-picking pseudoscience to validate their- and believe me, I'm using this word in it's loosest sense here- "logic" for justifying their blatantly violent political goals?

Right-Wing Fundamental Christian Conservatives: extremely homophobic, astonishingly anti-intellectual, considers women to be little more than livestock, prone to shoot/blow up anyone who disagrees with them (The Selma bombing, Oslo, the Oregon militia idiots, the Planned Parenthood attack), fanatically religiously devoted to what is basically a folk tale (The Bible), and are fond of using black/grey propaganda & cherry-picking pseudoscience to validate their- and believe me, I'm using this word in it's loosest sense here- "logic" for justifying their blatantly violent political goals?

Not much of a choice, if you ask me mate.

Given those two options, I'll stand with the liberal SJWs any day.
 
Liberal SJWs: extremely homophobic, astonishingly anti-intellectual, considers women to be little more than livestock, prone to shoot/blow up anyone who disagrees with them (9/11, Paris, Brussels) fanatically religiously devoted to what is basically a folk tale, and are fond of using black/grey propaganda & cherry-picking pseudoscience to validate their- and believe me, I'm using this word in it's loosest sense here- "logic" for justifying their blatantly violent political goals

By proxy through fundamental islamic terrorists
 
SJWs: extremely racist, astonishingly anti-intellectual, considers cishets to be little more than livestock, prone to shoot/blow up anyone who disagrees with them (proxy violence through hate speech laws and islamic terrorism, and direct assaults on police and trump supporters) fanatically religiously devoted to what is basically a folk tale (Marxism), and are fond of using black/grey propaganda & cherry-picking pseudoscience to validate their- and believe me, I'm using this word in it's loosest sense here- "logic" for justifying their blatantly violent political goals?

Secular Right-Wing Military Dictatorship: slightly homophobic, astonishingly anti-intellectual, considers ciswomen to be more than livestock, prone to shoot/blow up anyone who disagrees with them (Arresting islamic and communist terrorists as well as possibly those who commit hate speech via #killallmen), fanatically devoted to their culture, and are fond of using black/grey propaganda & science to validate their- and believe me, I'm using this word in it's strictest sense here- "logic" for justifying their blatantly violent political goals?
 
Last edited:
autisticdragonkin said:
SJWs: extremely racist, astonishingly anti-intellectual, considers cishets to be little more than livestock, prone to shoot/blow up anyone who disagrees with them (proxy violence through hate speech laws and islamic terrorism, and direct assaults on police and trump supporters) fanatically religiously devoted to what is basically a folk tale (Marxism), and are fond of using black/grey propaganda & cherry-picking pseudoscience to validate their- and believe me, I'm using this word in it's loosest sense here- "logic" for justifying their blatantly violent political goals?

Secular Right-Wing Military Dictatorship: slightly homophobic, astonishingly anti-intellectual, considers ciswomen to be more than livestock, prone to shoot/blow up anyone who disagrees with them (Arresting islamic and communist terrorists as well as possibly those who commit hate speech via #killallmen), fanatically devoted to their culture, and are fond of using black/grey propaganda & science to validate their- and believe me, I'm using this word in it's strictest sense here- "logic" for justifying their blatantly violent political goals?
Click to expand...
I think you are blatantly overestimating the influence that SJWs have, as well as how devoted they are to their beliefs. The vast majority of them, I get the sense, would actually be unlikely to make any changes; instead, they'd just bitch about problems and expect someone else to take care of them for them. They're going to tag posts #killallmen on Twitter, maybe, but when all men fail to kill themselves and/or magically drop dead, they'll just make more angry posts on Tumblr.

But hey, you'd do better in your fantasy military dictatorship. After all, it's your idea, so I'm sure they won't have you executed for wasting the state's valuable time playing anime games and spouting nonsensical philosophy just to be contradictory. And all that really matters is that the straight white weeb men with crippling autism are satisfied.
 
They can try, but they'll never destroy all the brussels.

brussel-sprouts-with-mushrooms-almonds17-e1345729581635.jpg
 
Rin said:
But hey, you'd do better in your fantasy military dictatorship. After all, it's your idea, so I'm sure they won't have you executed for wasting the state's valuable time playing anime games and spouting nonsensical philosophy just to be contradictory. And all that really matters is that the straight white weeb men with crippling autism are satisfied.
Click to expand...
@AN/ALR-56 please explain to @Rin how the west would look like under Pinochet
 
AN/ALR-56 said:
Probably like shit.
He defended Chile against comunism yes,but he was shit in every aspect except economy.
He basically made a shitty commie into a martyr by his coup,so yea,he sucked hard.
Click to expand...
I guess I was wrong about him and I ackowledge my mistake. But is it correct that he wouldn't have had someone killed just because they weren't employed but rather would have let the economy do that?
 
I'm locking this thread as discussion has derailed well away from the event in question and said event is over now in any case. Discussion of follow up events etc can be done in fresh threads.

If you wish to debate which brand of extreme politics is most oppressive you can do so in a deep thoughts thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom