March 21st Jihad attack on Brussels

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
If we have never let the Kebab in, this would have never happened. As we have been telling the Autistic West for half a year now.


This is East Europe right now. If we had been listened to, this would not have happened. The more happens, the more I like Trump.
 
Because that worked out so well in the long run? You're suggesting we occupy that country indefinitely. I don't think that'll work.

We need to destroy ISIS by going in, wiping the shit out of them, then pull out. Not every war needs to end in nation building, you know.

This is why I actually happen to agree with Trump's proposed moratorium on Muslim immigration and I think that European countries are way overdue on doing the same thing, because even if most Muslims pouring into Europe aren't terrorists, they still have such horrendously low IQs (especially among Somalis) that they don't know how to function in more advanced societies and choose to live off of welfare instead of seeking employment while reproducing like rabbits at the same time, and to make matters worse when they commit violent crimes and sexually assault women and children, the police refuse to take action and the news media covers it up simply because they don't want to be labeled as "racist" (see Rotherham, Champagne, and Sweden's supremely high rape rate for more details)

It's too late for Europe. Can't turn back that clock. I prefer Cruz's moratorium better though. Stop Muslim immigration from any country where they/AQ/terror groups have an open presence/training camps. Can't be called bigots by useful idiots then.
 
Sadly I can name several opposition groups:

Al-Nusra, Hezbollah, Rojava and Fatah Halab (the latter is 'merging' into the Syrian National Council alongside the FSA and Islamic Front) and these three are "the big three" when you factor out Rojava, which wants a similar deal to Iraqi Kurdistan.

I think we may see a softening of the Iranian Kurdish position simply due to how pragmatic the Iranians can be when they sense an opportunity.

The Iranians are currently in the opening salvo of a proxy war with primarily Saudi Arabia, but they have half an eye on how Turkey has been behaving. Under Erdogan the I.S has found an easy route into their own territory and a market to sell black market oil at far below the market price. This trade hasn't stopped entirely in spite of airstrikes and Erdogan swearing up and down the Turkish-Syrian border is secure.

Erdogan is a neo-Ottoman and seems to be waiting for the right time (largely when the Kurds tire themselves out, or wound I.S ennough) for him to send troops over the border. The sheer amount of armour and personnel carriers sent down in recent weeks (complete with extensive launching off points being constructed) points to this.

I actually see a Kurdish state of some description as an inevitability by this point, and the West should be prepared to usher in a new state and help it become stable by hurling as much investment as possible at it.

A more sensible Turkish leadership would argue that the Kurdish homeland would be Rojava and Iraqi Kurdistan (Kurdish Republic), they could do a deal with the government there and thus send all the pesky Kurds south and out of Turkey. Kurdistan replaces lost people with kurds and sees a boost to its economy, Turkey solves a long term political issue.

Highly optimistic, but a workable solution.

We were actually winning the Vietnam war and would have conquered the North. We "lost" Vietnam because of propaganda and lies on the home front, not because of what was actually happening there.

Now, I met a very nice man once. He was an elderly gent and had a lovely Mexican wife and had indeed retired to North Western Mexico (Baja) for the climate. In spite of the fact I was by far his junior he called me Sir, a quirk I found amusing.

He was what they called a "Liquidator" which I am sure sent a bit of a shudder through the older folks on this board, but for those not in the know, his job was to hunt down and destroy Vietcong cells, disarm their traps, and defend various FOBs and positions as and when required. You had to have a certain... resolve to be a liquidator and doubly so to come out of it alive.

Unlike the sterotypical vet he was happy to talk about his own harrowing experience. I asked him why he felt they lost the war, in spite of the fact that, on paper, they always won their skirmishes against the Vietcong and larger battles against the NVA. He said four things:

Loss of Men
Loss of Equipment
Loss of Resolve
Loss of Morale

It also didn't help that the South Vietnamese were all corrupt as anything, ran at the first sign of trouble, or were themselves Vietcong. The US might have been winning the war in the physical battles, but they sure as hell were losing the wider psychological war on their own men and their allies.
 
This is literally marine copypasta-tier dude.

The professionally trained and equipped Syrian army, along with the help of Iran and Russia, along with who knows how many independent militias, have been unable to stop the spread of IS.
That's because they've prioritized non-ISIS groups like the FSA and the PKK in a cynical attempt to force those seeking genuine reform to grovel to the likes of Assad and Erdōan. I'm sorry if you don't care about a bunch of sand-niggers being raped and massacred by Islamic Fascists, but pulling back won't make things better for anyone not Heiling Hitler.
 
What the fuck. What the FUCK. How am I learning about this from Kiwi fucking Farms?
I learned about it when I noticed a barrage of people on social media politely asking/begging everyone to be nice to Muslims, they aren't all bad, you know!
It's pretty much became the [un]official siren call that ISIS/Daesh/whatever they're supposed to be called this week have been up to no good. You never know what they did, but that kind of concentrated damage control can only mean one thing.

If an attack like this happens in the US within the next few months, Trump becomes a lock to win the presidency. *sigh*
Speaking of Donald Trump, I've seen a sizable group of people blaming him for the attack. Somehow.
It always really pisses me off when people's reactions to tragedies like to this are to blame political figures that have literally nothing to do with the event at all, and these days it's almost always directed towards Trump. I'm far from being a supporter of his, but come on, this is stupid as fuck.
 
This is why I actually happen to agree with Trump's proposed moratorium on Muslim immigration and I think that European countries are way overdue on doing the same thing, because even if most Muslims pouring into Europe aren't terrorists, they still have such horrendously low IQs (especially among Somalis) that they don't know how to function in more advanced societies and choose to live off of welfare instead of seeking employment while reproducing like rabbits at the same time, and to make matters worse when they commit violent crimes and sexually assault women and children, the police refuse to take action and the news media covers it up simply because they don't want to be labeled as "racist" (see Rotherham, Champagne, and Sweden's supremely high rape rate for more details)
Enforcing a ban on people entering your country for their beliefs is impossible, and downright Orwellian. Not to mention gangsters and criminals such as IS members are already highly talented at slipping through borders, and will remain so no matter what.

What you do is: figure out their next plan; cut them off while it's in progress; and, this is the crucial step as well as the one we've avoided, put their nuts in a vice. Cut off the money we're funneling to the likes of the Saudis and the Pakis, and only support the non-fascistic Mid-Easterners. Fucking 80s-South-Africa their asses until they cease their support of Islamic fascism in all its forms.

Trump's plan will do the opposite. Screwing over the people who need help, and fattening the pockets of the crooks who helped kick off this disaster.
 
Simply put, we need to crush them mercilessly, and we need to do it fucking yesterday. Which, as you pointed out, we can do in a matter of a couple of weeks.

NUKES AND WATERBOARDING!

Your possible next President of the United States of America would appear to agree:
yhgujhgjghjvbnbnmjnj.jpg

LOL, I love the use of the word "the" before "torture". Doesn't Chris say "the" in places where it is unnecessary?
 
Paris should've been a sign that this whole 'bringing in thousands of refugees from a region of the world notorious for it's militant groups without even bothering to do competent background checks' thing isn't a great idea.


"Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
George Santayana
 
What exactly do people mean and want when they say they want to stop Islam? That's too vague to mean anything tangible. Stop Islamic terror? Islam as a whole? Muslim immigration?
@Internet War Criminal @Male Idiot I really want to hear your ideas

I didn't say I wanted to 'stop Islam'? As far as what I want:

I want the West to stop pretending that Islam is an ideology that can co-exist with us. Individual muslims? Yes, of course they can. I know some. So do you. So does everyone. However, Islam as an ideology is incompatible with Western values. Yes, yes I know about the Crusades. Yes, I know about all of the discoveries that were stolen from their host countries after Islamic conquest and claimed by Islam.

Look at countries where the majority of the population is Christian, and their forms of government. In the 21st Century, can there be terrible things done by people whose majority of inhabitants are (practicing) Christian? Yes. However, they are few and far in-between, and these things are not done in the name of Christianity. In general, authoritarian governments in those countries try to suppress Christianity, they are not oppressing in its name. Same goes for other countries who are not necessarily rooted in Christianity as much as America, but are still firmly rooted in the Judeo-Christian derived Western Principles like most of Europe.

Now on the other hand, look at countries that are majority Muslim. And look at those whose governments are using Islam as their guiding principle. Would you want to live in any of them over the West? Forget about living there, would you want any of their governments/morals to take over your own countries? I'm gonna wager that no, you wouldn't.

The vast majority of Muslims worldwide do not condone violence, support terrorism or approve of Salafism/Wahhabism/Shiite equivalents/etc... ideologies. However, a significant portion of the Islamic world holds beliefs, even in the so-called 'moderate majority' that are incompatible with Western civilization. You just need to look at Pew and their many studies to see how hundreds of millions of Muslims hold views that 99% of the Western world would condemn as abhorrent:
http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/...ligion-politics-society-beliefs-about-sharia/
http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/07/01...ddle-east/pg-2014-07-01-islamic-extremism-10/

So you end up with hundreds of millions of Muslims who might not support ISIS materially or want to join, but still believe Sharia should become law of the land, adulteress women should be stoned to death, hands of thieves should be cut and people who abandon Islam or slander Mohammed should be killed. Those are the so-called 'Moderates'.

And you know what? They can believe what they want. And for all I care, short of genocide and other crimes against humanity like that, the can vote themselves the government they want. You see it in Gaza, you saw it in Egypt, we're seeing it in Tunisia, whenever we give them Democracy they immediately vote in terror groups and Islamists and other tyrannical bastards. Fine. Make your bed, then lie in it.

We don't have to accept that shit in the West. If you believe that kind of bullshit, we don't have to let you in. If you live in countries that have terror organizations running amock, we don't have to let you in. We don't have to accommodate your religious beliefs. We don't have to accept endless and endless waves of refugees and give them welfare while they steal, rape and forego all of the laws of the country. And we sure as shit don't have to accept anyone from countries where there's a high likelyhood that they will turn into terrorists.

In 2015, there were 452 suicide bombings against civilians in the world. How many of them were perpetrated by Muslims? 450 confirmed, and the last 2 by people (one Turkey, other Kosovo) who most likely were Muslims but couldn't confirm did it for that. By far and large, Muslims today are the ones who commit terrorism, and a large swath of them are against the West (even if they first and foremost kill their own). We should stop all Muslim immigration from any country which contains radical elements. I am all for accepting Christian refugees from Syria or Iraq (as long as we can vet they are actually Christians). I am all for accepting Yazide refugees, or Kurds (who are not Islamists). The rest? No way.

As far as Muslim immigration from the rest of the world, we need to seriously vet them. Vet them in depth and make sure that there is no way that they are radicals. Because you don't become a radical while only living in Rakka, Gaza or Islamabad. Today you can be from Brussels, Paris or London and be radicalized.

Oh yeah, and deport all of the refugees in Europe, and build a friggin wall if we have to in order to keep them out. Jail Westerners who help refugees cross over and enter Europe illegally. The West is not gonna be able to help anyone in humanitarian terms if it collapses on itself. There is no reason we should accept A SINGLE refugee when Saudi Arabia & all of the surrounding Arab countries refuse to do so.

As far as Muslim terror, we need to address it head on. ISIS strikes us in Europe? We need to rain death and destruction on them. Punch back 10 times harder. Make it so even the guy who milks goats for ISIS fighters doesn't want to go out of his hovel because he's terrified he's gonna get drone striked into oblivion. Yes, yes, all the while making sure we are respecting the Geneva convention.

By the way, according to the Geneva convention, if a terrorist hides in the middle of a group of civilians, or in a hospital, or anywhere like that, it is a legit target. And we should strike it. Obviously I am not talking about outlandish situations like bombing an hospital with 400 people to smithereens for Ahmed because he shot his AK a couple of times. But our ROE are ridiculous and end up costing more lives. We need a short, total and brutal war in order to end this as quickly as possible. All while respecting international law and the Geneva convention, the West needs to unleash its fury and crush all the Islamists and those who wish to destroy our way of life.

We are at war, and we need to start acting like it.

None of this will happen, even if Trump is elected he's not even gonna manage to build a wall or actually stop any immigration, and we're all fucked.

But you didn't ask me what was gonna happen, just what I wanted.


Edit: Not sure why talking about how to prevent future Brussels-type of attacks is 'off-topic'
 
Last edited:
I didn't say I wanted to 'stop Islam'? As far as what I want:

I want the West to stop pretending that Islam is an ideology that can co-exist with us. Individual muslims? Yes, of course they can. I know some. So do you. So does everyone. However, Islam as an ideology is incompatible with Western values. Yes, yes I know about the Crusades. Yes, I know about all of the discoveries that were stolen from their host countries after Islamic conquest and claimed by Islam.
We are at war, and we need to start acting like it.
I just wanted to know what your actual idea was. I'm neutral. Yes we need to do something to stop this. But people on both sides take their eye off the ball when they do not specify what the hell we are going to do, how far we're going to go, and what are our limits. We must be careful in our fight, lest we save the West in name, but lose the principles of democracy, universal suffrage, and protection of civil liberties.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
None of this will happen, even if Trump is elected he's not even gonna manage to build a wall or actually stop any immigration, and we're all fucked.

But you didn't ask me what was gonna happen, just what I wanted.


Edit: Not sure why talking about how to prevent future Brussels-type of attacks is 'off-topic'
A wall wouldn't stop immigration anyway, and any and all Muslim terrorists will find other ways to sneak in. The people fleeing these zones will never have a home to return to until the psychopaths who took over their homes are sent to firing squads until every last one of the fuckers are dead.

We have to grab the bull by the balls here, including making sacrifices of our own. No more cheap oil from Saudi Arabia. No more cozying up to people who fatten the pockets of the next Osama Bin Laden. No more cushy arms sales. No more even leaving weapons around behind. Blow up their armament factories. Enforce a no-fly zone with the rigor of an obsessive-compulsive. Give actual support to non-fascists. Put boots on the ground. Put the thumbscrews to all these motherfuckers where it hurts: their wallets, their resources, and their creature comforts. No more giving shit a pass.
 
Just read that the doctors have had to performed "many, many" amputations because the bombs were filled with shrapnel, and many more to come in the next hours.

jesus fucking christ.
 
I want to cry and be sad over this but it's nothing new and I am out of tears to shed. I wish it didn't have to be this way.
 
I want to cry and be sad over this but it's nothing new and I am out of tears to shed. I wish it didn't have to be this way.

That's how I felt at first, but then you see pictures like this
pTMuBzs.png


and read about how they might need amputations due to shrapnel, how they suffered 2nd and 3rd degree burns to their hands, faces and heads, and then it becomes hard to stay cold about it.

The one of the left was at the Boston Marathon finish line when the attack happened, and he was down the block of the Bataclan when the terrorists started shooting. And now after dodging terrorist twice already, he's disfigured, maybe amputated, at 19. On his way back home after being away doing humanitarian work and community service to help his fellow man.

Hard to stay indifferent.
 
Do you honestly think I am trying to be indifferent?! In actuality, I would rather not be! I've just exhausted my capability to feel after so much death and loss.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom