Marble is now a white supremacist rock

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://heatst.com/culture-wars/iow...-actually-influences-white-supremacist-ideas/

A professor at the University of Iowa says that cherishing “white marble” in classical art actually contributes to “white supremacist ideas today.”


Sarah Bond
Sarah Bond, an assistant professor in Classics at the university, has penned an article at Hyperallergic, which describes itself as “a forum for playful, serious, and radical perspectives on art and culture in the world today” and boasts about 70,000 subscribers.

Bond argues that “many of the statues, reliefs, and sarcophagi created in the ancient Western world were in fact painted” and “white marble” people are seeing today in classical artwork was actually supposed to be colored, Campus Reform reported.

The professor therefore suggests that “the equation of white marble with beauty is not an inherent truth of the universe” and is in fact “a dangerous construct that continues to influence white supremacist ideas today.”

She continued the article, adding that “most museums and art history textbooks contain a predominantly neon white display of skin tone” that “has an impact on the way we view the antique world.”


Who knew Michaelangelo was a secret white supremacist.
As an example, Bond notes that “the assemblage of neon whiteness serves to create a false idea of homogeneity — everyone was very white! — across the Mediterranean region” which gives “ammunition for white supremacists today, including groups like Identity Europa, who use classical statuary as a symbol of white male superiority.”

“It may have taken just one classical statue to influence the false construction of race, but it will take many of us to tear it down,” Bond finished her article. “We have the power to return color to the ancient world, but it has to start with us.”

After Campus Reform approached the Iowa university professor, she replied claiming white unpainted marble is “an 18th century construct.”

“The point is simply that Greeks and Romans actually added color to their art and thus white marble was often the canvas rather than the finished product.

“The exalting of white (and unpainted) marble was then an 18th century construct of beauty rather than representative of the classical view. In any case, let me know if you would like to discuss this issue further.”
 
Greek art sure makes me think about the finer points in life, like white skin and Hitler.
 
The thing is, people in the 18th century didn't have the ultraviolet light technology required see the remnants of paint that we have today.

And anyway, even when painted the statues were white, so what is this person's point?
dvknxs.jpg
 
Anyone who has ever compared pure marble to the shit that had paint on it in the past has to admit it looks a lot better without that paint.
 
They are really not very creative when picking what's racist sometimes. "This thing is white, and white people are bad, so this thing is bad"
It's a shame when the very color of a natural object can be seen as racist despite haven't existed for millennia.
 
Back
Top Bottom