💊 Manosphere manhood101.com - The Cuck Academy

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Okay, gone over this with a comb a few times;

and this;
Consent.
After listening to both quite a few time I found there are basically no comparable inflections between 'The Professor' that is talking.
Huh, well that is interesting. Is it possible he's just the retarded puppet master who has his students claim that they're Spartacus in public? @MasterDisaster thought of this while comparing his voices and raised this as an idea.

Because that's the thing. We've never seen a classroom in action. Only the debates, where they gangbeat the challengers by calling them faggots. Is it possible that he's sending his cult members out to represent as him as a masculation exercise? Because part of the marketing stuff he implemented with his cult is assertiveness, and this might be used as a way for them to slowly build their confidence to fuck bitches. Plus it further distances himself away from the front, and sets up a fall guy. As for whoever that Nick guy is, he's possibly his number one guy.
 
Huh, well that is interesting. Is it possible he's just the retarded puppet master who has his students claim that they're Spartacus in public?

Because that's the thing. We've never seen a classroom in action. Only the debates, where they gangbeat the challengers by calling them faggots. Is it possible that he's sending his cult members out to represent as him as a masculation exercise? Because part of the marketing stuff he implemented with his cult is assertiveness, and this might be used as a way for them to slowly build their confidence to fuck bitches. As for whoever that Nick guy is, he's possibly his number one guy.
I was having the same thought. Professor never talks outside of the forum and his classes and one of his besties fronts as him when interacting with people from outside his fenced of website.

This is getting very conspiratorial.
 
I was having a similar thought. Professor never talks outside of the forum and his classes and one of his besties fronts as him when interacting with people from outside his fenced of website.

This is getting very conspiratorial.
But it makes it more interesting. :ween:
 
My particular view on this would have to be the sudden, knee-jerk reaction we pulled from The Professor and his (alleged) lackeys the moment that the name Charles Gellman came into the discussion. The instant that name was evoked, there was a violent lapse in activity followed by the sudden deletion of content en masse on his private forums. A few of the lackeys and/or puppets that have since visited have been loudly decrying against "framing an innocent man" in the fear that we'd be harming some unassuming bystander named Charles Gellman.

My question would have to be why this same response was not garnished from our guesswork directing towards Nikolai Hajrondan, who is obviously not The Professor, given our current evidence. If Nokolai Hajrondan is assuredly not The Professor, then why was the mention of his name not offered the same knee-jerk-style response? Why the vested interest in protecting Charles above Nikolai?

There's far too much evidence strewn around in this thread for us to assume that a shot was thrown in the dark and just by happenstance managed to hit upon Charles Gellman without rhyme or reason. The simple fact that both Charles and The Professor are so adamantly invested in the PUA trade alone strikes a particularly curious bell, to say nothing of the myriad of other strings that have already been addressed in the original post, and the most of which being the undeniably obvious response concerning his mass deletion that mentioning him by name evoked.
 
My particular view on this would have to be the sudden, knee-jerk reaction we pulled from The Professor and his (alleged) lackeys the moment that the name Charles Gellman came into the discussion. The instant that name was evoked, there was a violent lapse in activity followed by the sudden deletion of content en masse on his private forums. A few of the lackeys and/or puppets that have since visited have been loudly decrying against "framing an innocent man" in the fear that we'd be harming some unassuming bystander named Charles Gellman.

My question would have to be why this same response was not garnished from our guesswork directing towards Nikolai Hajrondan, who is obviously not The Professor, given our current evidence. If Nokolai Hajrondan is assuredly not The Professor, then why was the mention of his name not offered the same knee-jerk-style response? Why the vested interest in protecting Charles above Nikolai?
Because they use Nikki as the lightningrod/faceman most likely.
 
My question would have to be why this same response was not garnished from our guesswork directing towards Nikolai Hajrondan, who is obviously not The Professor, given our current evidence. If Nokolai Hajrondan is assuredly not The Professor, then why was the mention of his name not offered the same knee-jerk-style response? Why the vested interest in protecting Charles above Nikolai?
Here's the idea:

Nikolai is the guy that is talking in debates and fronts as the professor when interacting with the outside world. He's a student/trusted supporter so the real Professor doesn't give a shit

Charles Gellman is The Professor proper and does not talk to non-students and was getting very nervous when his name popped up in the same sentence as manhood101.
 
Because they use Nikki as the lightningrod/faceman most likely.
There was a vid, I forget which one, where the detractor complained that "The Professor" was hiding his face during the webcam debate. I'll poke around my YT history and see if I can find it.
 
Back
Top Bottom