J
JU 199
Guest
kiwifarms.net
@manhood101.com _____ do you want to debate now? The first topic will be the motivation behind that video and allegations of micro penis.
Last edited by a moderator:
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
H
HG 400
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Let's dox his children.
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2015
I'm in the east bay area. I'll try to find him for you next time I cross the bridge to the cityLooks like I'll never get to fight him irl
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2015
I found that this guy has a blog here: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/boys-men
He's excessively talked about boys growing up to become men there.
Also his history of publications: http://wagner.edu/psychology/grothpubs/
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2015
[note: I wish I had saved the posts being responded to here....]
well it's very neighborly of this SACKLESS FAGGOT, Paul Elam, to assume the "moral" high ground. but let's see just how moral this fucking handjob really is.
first of all, this retard actually thinks Manhood Academy is part of the Men's Rights Activists Army. nothing could be further from the truth.
Manhood Academy has always been opposed to sackless faggots like Paul Elam from the very start. we've never sought to unite ourselves with spineless slugs like him who reflexively kowtow and cater to women.
[snip]
since you are now Lord and Savior of the universe, setting the tone for 'moral' critiques, we are forced to critique your beard. you look like a faggot version of Grizzly Adams. it's hard to tell whether you care about men's rights or you're about to volunteer to be a power bottom at the next gay pride festival.
[snip]
notice like most incoherent, incompetent feminists, you can't even make a specific argument. this is like asking a chick to think and type at the same time.
[snip]
in other words, you're too fucking stupid to read comprehensively above a 3rd grade level, so you gave some little bitch speech about not being able to connect the dots. check.
[snip]
and here we have another perfect example of the failure of the American Educational System. this fucking retard can't even grasp the fundamental concepts being laid out in the book w/o accompanying pictures and finger paints.
this is either a flat out LIE, or this faggot power bottom is simply TOO FUCKING DUMB TO READ. i would expect a chick with a vagina and the IQ of a pencil to make this kind of fundamental error. no wonder the MRAs are in trouble if they have to rely on incompetent fags like this do their thinking for them.
our book specifically says just the opposite of what this incompetent fag is stating here. it's clear from our work that gender functions are COMPLEMENTARY NOT COMPETITIVE. that's about as bright as saying your eye is 'superior' to your leg. in a system based upon complementary functions, like your own human body for instance, there is no thought of competition or 'superiority'. the hand doesn't compete against the eye or the foot. one is not superior to the other. they all serve different functions that are all equally necessary to the functioning of the body.
in like manner, men and women serve different (not superior) functions that are necessary to a healthy relationship. we point this out many times, in the book and on the forum.
when we do talk about "superiority," we always note that the CONTEXT SPECIFICALLY points to women competing for MALE functions.
e.g., we would say a woman is "superior" to a man when discussing the baby-making function. this does not indicate that a woman is superior to a man as a human being, but ONLY in reference to competing over a female's INTENDED FUNCTION. but Paul is too intellectually dishonest to point out that we already make this key distinction.
this fucktard is obviously too stupid to read or not bright enough to keep his lies consistent.
[snip]
again, this fucking moron FAILS to understand that even the United States Constitution is against a democracy.
[utub]
the Founding Fathers believed in the RULE OF LAW ("...to the end it may be a government of laws and not of men."--John Adams).. according to this fucking retard, consensus is a much better moral compass than a universal law. basically, this genius is implying that there is no morality except that which we arbitrarily decide.
back in the 1700s, according to Paul's chick logic, since the majority of people were in favor of slavery, owning black people was the moral thing to do. after all, according to this fucktard, all you need is a majority to be right.
and when 100 kids vote for ice cream for dinner against just 2 adult, again, democracy is the most moral action available. fuck your health. fuck common sense. fuck any coherent thought of ruling principles. as long as we have an American Idol majority, we have a moral winner.
since this fucking retard is so gung-ho about democracy, why isn't he protesting the electorate system we have in place today. why doesn't he just recommend that we place buzzers next to everybody's hand and let them vote on whoever they wish. and why limit it to adults. why not include children as well. in fact, why stop there. why not allow pets as well since they'll be governed by the decisions we make.
this fucktard equates "human decency" to giving everybody a say. the problem is, if a person isn't educated, their say works AGAINST human decency. it's indecent to let children become obese. but according to this fucktard, it's more decent to just give a child its way. if a child wants a bowl of chocolate for breakfast, who are we to 'indecently' rob it of its childish whims.
if the majority of southerners want to own slaves, who are we to 'indecently' rob them of their economy. they voted on it. they wanted it. they should get it. majority rule right?
stupid stuffed animal.
mens-rights-meeting-tonight-in-my-pants!.jpg
[snip]
this tired faggot has made the same mistakes as our "Seduction Community" critics. yet our own students prove this to be a fallacy. unlike this fucking covert handjob, everything we do is transparent and out in the open for the public to judge. we've already answered this silly money accusation about a thousand times over. paul obviously thinks he's being original by trying to slander us with this accusation. this gutless fucking coward would never dare face us with these pathetic accusations.
in fact we challenge any of our critics to prove that Manhood Academy is some type of money making scheme.
keep hiding, you fucking coward.
[snip]
that sounds like a faggot feminist argument. "his"dom? "manly thrill"? this type of shaming argument is something i'd expect from a chick. but this just goes to show the extent of male emasculation today. even guys rely on retarded chick arguments to make their case.
the irony is Principles 101 expressly exposes this exact type of cultural machismo Paul accuses us of indulging. only a fucking retard would boldly make such a dishonest claim, especially when evidence to the contrary is so readily available.
[snip]
ironically, we address this very misunderstanding in a section called "Honoring Vs. Obeying" (p.90). this senile old fuck has the reading comprehension of a carrot stick.
[snip]
of course, all these comments are taken out of context. again, another CHICK tactic.
if we were going to play the retarded Paul Elam board game, we could do the exact same thing with his own faggot site. here we've pulled DIRECT QUOTES from one of Paul's own articles:
[blahlink]
no stranger to controversy, Paul shares a few startling admissions:
"man is a word interchangeable with pedophile"
paul admits that he sides with Catholic priests in saying "NO" to child rape protection laws. he wants you all to know that it's ok if you want to touch little boys. he shares your pain.
"Guys, if you get physical include beta male enforcers"
what the fuck is this incoherent racoon even trying to say??
"...the temptation to rape a girl is a sexual privilege."
sorry, Paul, but we never condone the rape of women and children. we have to part ways with you here.
"...it all started with one woman who said no, during the days of my youth, we all enforced molesting elderly or handicapped women. After all, we put Rosa Parks in a special position at the back of the bus."
while most people remember Rosa Parks as a civil rights activist, Paul has slightly different memories of his encounters with elderly and handicapped women.
every single word referenced can be found in Paul's article linked above, so you can tell we're not making any of this up. since Paul feels that employing proper context is completely irrelevant to the meaning of words, we felt it was helpful to show this fag the same courtesy when addressing his own controversial statements.
[snip]
don't worry Paul, we didn't make up any of these statements either. they can ALL BE FOUND IN YOUR ARTICLE REFERENCED ABOVE.
[snip]
this sounds exactly like the same Feminist argument that attempts to demonize any functional relationships between men and women. we're surprised Paul didn't just come out and say that a woman who wants to cook for her husband or take care of her children is betraying her gender.
like most Feminists, his argument is SHAME-based. no evidence to support his position (can't really fault him, because like most incompetent bitches, his reasoning relies heavily on grade school sarcasm-- the favorite choice of WOMEN today), no attempt to specifically address dissenting opinions/views with anything other than dismissive authoritative fallacies. no intellectual honesty. no coherent arguments. in short-- no balls. he may at as well hang a sign around his neck that says:
"crotchety old woman on board! you young punks stay out of my rose bushes! GRRRRrrrr!!"
[snip]
or in your case a man with NO BALLS.
[snip]
yes, in Paul's quest to remove the balls of every man in America (with his own lips), he's failed to realize that the male gender is distinctly different from the female gender. in his emasculated version of gender "equality," men should be having babies and women should be growing mustaches and protecting us in the police force. to even insinuate there are any gender difference is akin to heresy in his retarded MRA universe.
[snip]
sorry, we didn't feel that "FAG'S RIGHTS" was representative of the message we were shooting for. but if it makes you feel any better, you can put your lips on Angry Harry's balls and form your own men's rights group based on the subjugation of his penis by your mouth.
[snip]
yeah. this is completely out of character for a fag like you that's made your living off of dismissing other views as beneath your consideration.
you obviously feel that your MRA crown is some sort of American Idol honor that comes with a tiara and sash reading: "here is the most popular, cute, perky MRA ever!!!"
maybe you haven't realized this yet, you incompetent faggot, but real men don't care about popularity contests or crawling on their bellies just to gain the approval of chicks. you are the poster child for the pussywhipped he-bitch that has come to define emasculated America.
[snip]
so in Paul's warped mind, even DARING to question the feminist gender constructs is akin to "bigotry" and "hatred".. this is just feminist shaming tactics masquerading as the male opinion.
first of all, real men can handle confrontation. you can't.
you're a cowardly fucking faggot ducking debate/discussion of the issues every chance you get. it's amazing you even bothered to address us.
but you did not disappoint. the requisite shaming language is there. the dismissive authoritative fallicies are there. the incoherent, out of context use of quotes are there. the intellectually dishonest blanket statements are there. in short, you are a feminist's wet dream--you don't have to make sense like a man because you're not required to make sense like a man.
it's impossible to argue with a FUCKING COWARD like you who can never be bothered to point to SPECIFICS because you know you'll be caught in your own hypocrisy. you would never dare to put your arguments in black and white for all to see because you're a FUCKING GUTLESS COWARD who can only thrive in a politically correct climate of passive-aggressive blanket whining that remains void of specifics. .
you should have just said: Manhood Academy, bad.
Paul Elam, good.
why did you even burden yourself with the rest of this trite, elitest garbage? it's not like you actually have the spine to coherently defend your views like a real man anyway. so what was the point? are you working on obtaining a girl scout badge for most passive-aggressive complaints made in one post?
crybaby.jpg
[snip]
yeah. thanks for your concern, papa. but i'm pretty sure teaching guys how to run like cowards and answer their critics like scared, emasculated faggots isn't exactly going to help them.
why don't you just advise them to do what you do best: find the biggest, most popular chick clique in high school and get on your knees for their attention. you go girl!
[snip]
wait a minute. so now this fucking gutless faggot is a mind reader? we didn't realize Paul was the one who telepathically contacted Miles Groth and forced him to email Manhood Academy. neither did we realize that when we skeptically inquired as to our involvement in the Male Studies Curriculum, and Miles Groth responded with, and I quote:
"what you're doing is very important to all of us."
that Paul was going to reinterpret the entire thing to mean that Miles was really just talking about having a spot of tea.
isn't it amazing that this fucking cowardly faggot has the nerve to play Psychic Friends Network while being completely oblivious to our entire email exchange.
[snip]
or in reality, an incoherent faggot named Paul Elam is playing this off as Miles being his pet bitch and them working it out over a private S&M session.
[snip]
you've had the pleasure of having Dr. Groth put a dick up your ass you lying faggot. interesting how our black and white email correspondence is suddenly less relevant than your goofy fucking anecdotal relationship.
or we could just use your retarded chick logic and assume you're referring to your sexual relationship with Dr. Groth. tell me paul,does having your asshole stretched out to the size of a frisbee affect your ability to reason?
[snip]
ok so our original examination of MRAs was correct to begin with.. you guys are nothing more than incompetent fags who don't have the balls to say what you mean. what young men are going to benefit from incompetent fags like you negotiating secret backdoor deals where you hide your real motives from the public?
why would any young man growing up today want to learn how to cower whenever his opinion is called into question? emasculated men already do that today. they don't need some furry racoon offically waving the emasculation flag in the faces.
[snip]
too bad we have an ACTUAL RECORD of our exchange with Dr. Groth. YOU LYING COWARDLY FAGGOT.
[snip]
well at least now we know where Paul learned to think like a chick. as we've demonstrated, this is one of the most incompetent, cowardly examples of forming an argument. the only thing Paul's concerned with is whether or not quote marks were used. forget about intellectual honesty or employing proper context when referring to a person's work. as far as Paul's concerned, as long as it's typed and double spaced, it must be the true.
has anybody bothered to tell this fucktard that knowledge is only as competent and relevant as the one employing it.
[snip]
leave it to the Moral Leader of The Universe to play the Professional Victim card:
"Manhood academy was being meaaaaaan to me " ...in the emasculated male universe, making sense comes a distant second to popularity polls and southern belle indignation.
[snip]
rustoleum-irony.jpg
[snip]
in other words, if you are a SCARED FUCKING SACKLESS FAGGOT, please don't bother making coherent arguments. please don't bother using evidence. please don't bother citing specifics. please don't bother debating. please don't confront anything that disturbs or exposes your emasculated viewpoint.
this isn't a pokemon game you fucking faggot.
[snip]
in the future, please don't ever confuse Manhood Academy with the emasculated fucking faggots in the MRA ranks.
we are REAL MEN.
we are not SCARED FUCKING COWARDS LIKE YOU.
we don't not DUCK DEBATE because we're not ashamed to rationally and reasonably defend our views. this should seem like common sense to any man. but it's obvious from your own words, that your own emasculation supersedes any thought of intellectual honesty. dismissing others in a fit of southern belle indignation should not be a default setting for any man.
you are a shame to your entire gender.
well it's very neighborly of this SACKLESS FAGGOT, Paul Elam, to assume the "moral" high ground. but let's see just how moral this fucking handjob really is.
first of all, this retard actually thinks Manhood Academy is part of the Men's Rights Activists Army. nothing could be further from the truth.
Manhood Academy has always been opposed to sackless faggots like Paul Elam from the very start. we've never sought to unite ourselves with spineless slugs like him who reflexively kowtow and cater to women.
[snip]
since you are now Lord and Savior of the universe, setting the tone for 'moral' critiques, we are forced to critique your beard. you look like a faggot version of Grizzly Adams. it's hard to tell whether you care about men's rights or you're about to volunteer to be a power bottom at the next gay pride festival.
[snip]
notice like most incoherent, incompetent feminists, you can't even make a specific argument. this is like asking a chick to think and type at the same time.
[snip]
in other words, you're too fucking stupid to read comprehensively above a 3rd grade level, so you gave some little bitch speech about not being able to connect the dots. check.
[snip]
and here we have another perfect example of the failure of the American Educational System. this fucking retard can't even grasp the fundamental concepts being laid out in the book w/o accompanying pictures and finger paints.
this is either a flat out LIE, or this faggot power bottom is simply TOO FUCKING DUMB TO READ. i would expect a chick with a vagina and the IQ of a pencil to make this kind of fundamental error. no wonder the MRAs are in trouble if they have to rely on incompetent fags like this do their thinking for them.
our book specifically says just the opposite of what this incompetent fag is stating here. it's clear from our work that gender functions are COMPLEMENTARY NOT COMPETITIVE. that's about as bright as saying your eye is 'superior' to your leg. in a system based upon complementary functions, like your own human body for instance, there is no thought of competition or 'superiority'. the hand doesn't compete against the eye or the foot. one is not superior to the other. they all serve different functions that are all equally necessary to the functioning of the body.
in like manner, men and women serve different (not superior) functions that are necessary to a healthy relationship. we point this out many times, in the book and on the forum.
when we do talk about "superiority," we always note that the CONTEXT SPECIFICALLY points to women competing for MALE functions.
e.g., we would say a woman is "superior" to a man when discussing the baby-making function. this does not indicate that a woman is superior to a man as a human being, but ONLY in reference to competing over a female's INTENDED FUNCTION. but Paul is too intellectually dishonest to point out that we already make this key distinction.
this fucktard is obviously too stupid to read or not bright enough to keep his lies consistent.
[snip]
again, this fucking moron FAILS to understand that even the United States Constitution is against a democracy.
[utub]
the Founding Fathers believed in the RULE OF LAW ("...to the end it may be a government of laws and not of men."--John Adams).. according to this fucking retard, consensus is a much better moral compass than a universal law. basically, this genius is implying that there is no morality except that which we arbitrarily decide.
back in the 1700s, according to Paul's chick logic, since the majority of people were in favor of slavery, owning black people was the moral thing to do. after all, according to this fucktard, all you need is a majority to be right.
and when 100 kids vote for ice cream for dinner against just 2 adult, again, democracy is the most moral action available. fuck your health. fuck common sense. fuck any coherent thought of ruling principles. as long as we have an American Idol majority, we have a moral winner.
since this fucking retard is so gung-ho about democracy, why isn't he protesting the electorate system we have in place today. why doesn't he just recommend that we place buzzers next to everybody's hand and let them vote on whoever they wish. and why limit it to adults. why not include children as well. in fact, why stop there. why not allow pets as well since they'll be governed by the decisions we make.
this fucktard equates "human decency" to giving everybody a say. the problem is, if a person isn't educated, their say works AGAINST human decency. it's indecent to let children become obese. but according to this fucktard, it's more decent to just give a child its way. if a child wants a bowl of chocolate for breakfast, who are we to 'indecently' rob it of its childish whims.
if the majority of southerners want to own slaves, who are we to 'indecently' rob them of their economy. they voted on it. they wanted it. they should get it. majority rule right?
stupid stuffed animal.
mens-rights-meeting-tonight-in-my-pants!.jpg
[snip]
this tired faggot has made the same mistakes as our "Seduction Community" critics. yet our own students prove this to be a fallacy. unlike this fucking covert handjob, everything we do is transparent and out in the open for the public to judge. we've already answered this silly money accusation about a thousand times over. paul obviously thinks he's being original by trying to slander us with this accusation. this gutless fucking coward would never dare face us with these pathetic accusations.
in fact we challenge any of our critics to prove that Manhood Academy is some type of money making scheme.
keep hiding, you fucking coward.
[snip]
that sounds like a faggot feminist argument. "his"dom? "manly thrill"? this type of shaming argument is something i'd expect from a chick. but this just goes to show the extent of male emasculation today. even guys rely on retarded chick arguments to make their case.
the irony is Principles 101 expressly exposes this exact type of cultural machismo Paul accuses us of indulging. only a fucking retard would boldly make such a dishonest claim, especially when evidence to the contrary is so readily available.
[snip]
ironically, we address this very misunderstanding in a section called "Honoring Vs. Obeying" (p.90). this senile old fuck has the reading comprehension of a carrot stick.
[snip]
of course, all these comments are taken out of context. again, another CHICK tactic.
if we were going to play the retarded Paul Elam board game, we could do the exact same thing with his own faggot site. here we've pulled DIRECT QUOTES from one of Paul's own articles:
[blahlink]
no stranger to controversy, Paul shares a few startling admissions:
"man is a word interchangeable with pedophile"
paul admits that he sides with Catholic priests in saying "NO" to child rape protection laws. he wants you all to know that it's ok if you want to touch little boys. he shares your pain.
"Guys, if you get physical include beta male enforcers"
what the fuck is this incoherent racoon even trying to say??
"...the temptation to rape a girl is a sexual privilege."
sorry, Paul, but we never condone the rape of women and children. we have to part ways with you here.
"...it all started with one woman who said no, during the days of my youth, we all enforced molesting elderly or handicapped women. After all, we put Rosa Parks in a special position at the back of the bus."
while most people remember Rosa Parks as a civil rights activist, Paul has slightly different memories of his encounters with elderly and handicapped women.
every single word referenced can be found in Paul's article linked above, so you can tell we're not making any of this up. since Paul feels that employing proper context is completely irrelevant to the meaning of words, we felt it was helpful to show this fag the same courtesy when addressing his own controversial statements.
[snip]
don't worry Paul, we didn't make up any of these statements either. they can ALL BE FOUND IN YOUR ARTICLE REFERENCED ABOVE.
[snip]
this sounds exactly like the same Feminist argument that attempts to demonize any functional relationships between men and women. we're surprised Paul didn't just come out and say that a woman who wants to cook for her husband or take care of her children is betraying her gender.
like most Feminists, his argument is SHAME-based. no evidence to support his position (can't really fault him, because like most incompetent bitches, his reasoning relies heavily on grade school sarcasm-- the favorite choice of WOMEN today), no attempt to specifically address dissenting opinions/views with anything other than dismissive authoritative fallacies. no intellectual honesty. no coherent arguments. in short-- no balls. he may at as well hang a sign around his neck that says:
"crotchety old woman on board! you young punks stay out of my rose bushes! GRRRRrrrr!!"
[snip]
or in your case a man with NO BALLS.
[snip]
yes, in Paul's quest to remove the balls of every man in America (with his own lips), he's failed to realize that the male gender is distinctly different from the female gender. in his emasculated version of gender "equality," men should be having babies and women should be growing mustaches and protecting us in the police force. to even insinuate there are any gender difference is akin to heresy in his retarded MRA universe.
[snip]
sorry, we didn't feel that "FAG'S RIGHTS" was representative of the message we were shooting for. but if it makes you feel any better, you can put your lips on Angry Harry's balls and form your own men's rights group based on the subjugation of his penis by your mouth.
[snip]
yeah. this is completely out of character for a fag like you that's made your living off of dismissing other views as beneath your consideration.
you obviously feel that your MRA crown is some sort of American Idol honor that comes with a tiara and sash reading: "here is the most popular, cute, perky MRA ever!!!"
maybe you haven't realized this yet, you incompetent faggot, but real men don't care about popularity contests or crawling on their bellies just to gain the approval of chicks. you are the poster child for the pussywhipped he-bitch that has come to define emasculated America.
[snip]
so in Paul's warped mind, even DARING to question the feminist gender constructs is akin to "bigotry" and "hatred".. this is just feminist shaming tactics masquerading as the male opinion.
first of all, real men can handle confrontation. you can't.
you're a cowardly fucking faggot ducking debate/discussion of the issues every chance you get. it's amazing you even bothered to address us.
but you did not disappoint. the requisite shaming language is there. the dismissive authoritative fallicies are there. the incoherent, out of context use of quotes are there. the intellectually dishonest blanket statements are there. in short, you are a feminist's wet dream--you don't have to make sense like a man because you're not required to make sense like a man.
it's impossible to argue with a FUCKING COWARD like you who can never be bothered to point to SPECIFICS because you know you'll be caught in your own hypocrisy. you would never dare to put your arguments in black and white for all to see because you're a FUCKING GUTLESS COWARD who can only thrive in a politically correct climate of passive-aggressive blanket whining that remains void of specifics. .
you should have just said: Manhood Academy, bad.
Paul Elam, good.
why did you even burden yourself with the rest of this trite, elitest garbage? it's not like you actually have the spine to coherently defend your views like a real man anyway. so what was the point? are you working on obtaining a girl scout badge for most passive-aggressive complaints made in one post?
crybaby.jpg
[snip]
yeah. thanks for your concern, papa. but i'm pretty sure teaching guys how to run like cowards and answer their critics like scared, emasculated faggots isn't exactly going to help them.
why don't you just advise them to do what you do best: find the biggest, most popular chick clique in high school and get on your knees for their attention. you go girl!
[snip]
wait a minute. so now this fucking gutless faggot is a mind reader? we didn't realize Paul was the one who telepathically contacted Miles Groth and forced him to email Manhood Academy. neither did we realize that when we skeptically inquired as to our involvement in the Male Studies Curriculum, and Miles Groth responded with, and I quote:
"what you're doing is very important to all of us."
that Paul was going to reinterpret the entire thing to mean that Miles was really just talking about having a spot of tea.
isn't it amazing that this fucking cowardly faggot has the nerve to play Psychic Friends Network while being completely oblivious to our entire email exchange.
[snip]
or in reality, an incoherent faggot named Paul Elam is playing this off as Miles being his pet bitch and them working it out over a private S&M session.
[snip]
you've had the pleasure of having Dr. Groth put a dick up your ass you lying faggot. interesting how our black and white email correspondence is suddenly less relevant than your goofy fucking anecdotal relationship.
or we could just use your retarded chick logic and assume you're referring to your sexual relationship with Dr. Groth. tell me paul,does having your asshole stretched out to the size of a frisbee affect your ability to reason?
[snip]
ok so our original examination of MRAs was correct to begin with.. you guys are nothing more than incompetent fags who don't have the balls to say what you mean. what young men are going to benefit from incompetent fags like you negotiating secret backdoor deals where you hide your real motives from the public?
why would any young man growing up today want to learn how to cower whenever his opinion is called into question? emasculated men already do that today. they don't need some furry racoon offically waving the emasculation flag in the faces.
[snip]
too bad we have an ACTUAL RECORD of our exchange with Dr. Groth. YOU LYING COWARDLY FAGGOT.
[snip]
well at least now we know where Paul learned to think like a chick. as we've demonstrated, this is one of the most incompetent, cowardly examples of forming an argument. the only thing Paul's concerned with is whether or not quote marks were used. forget about intellectual honesty or employing proper context when referring to a person's work. as far as Paul's concerned, as long as it's typed and double spaced, it must be the true.
has anybody bothered to tell this fucktard that knowledge is only as competent and relevant as the one employing it.
[snip]
leave it to the Moral Leader of The Universe to play the Professional Victim card:
"Manhood academy was being meaaaaaan to me
" ...in the emasculated male universe, making sense comes a distant second to popularity polls and southern belle indignation.[snip]
rustoleum-irony.jpg
[snip]
in other words, if you are a SCARED FUCKING SACKLESS FAGGOT, please don't bother making coherent arguments. please don't bother using evidence. please don't bother citing specifics. please don't bother debating. please don't confront anything that disturbs or exposes your emasculated viewpoint.
this isn't a pokemon game you fucking faggot.
[snip]
in the future, please don't ever confuse Manhood Academy with the emasculated fucking faggots in the MRA ranks.
we are REAL MEN.
we are not SCARED FUCKING COWARDS LIKE YOU.
we don't not DUCK DEBATE because we're not ashamed to rationally and reasonably defend our views. this should seem like common sense to any man. but it's obvious from your own words, that your own emasculation supersedes any thought of intellectual honesty. dismissing others in a fit of southern belle indignation should not be a default setting for any man.
you are a shame to your entire gender.
More Miles Groth info.
EDIT: Okay after some more digging it seems Mister Groth has a very unhealthy obsession with boys turning into men; he really wants to spend some time around children. http://www.boysinitiative.org/resources/experts
Last edited:
J
JU 199
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Chick academy sister site has been archived, including the page on 'being quiet'
https://archive.is/20151220114537/http://chickacademy.com/
'How to shut the fuck up'
https://archive.is/20151220114718/http://chickacademy.com/shuttingthefuckup.html
https://archive.is/20151220114537/http://chickacademy.com/
'How to shut the fuck up'
https://archive.is/20151220114718/http://chickacademy.com/shuttingthefuckup.html
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2015
"Shutting the fuck up is one of the bravest, most difficult skills to master as a woman..."
Wouldn't that make him a woman in his own words then? He was loud and cocky before he was doxxed, but now he's trying to cover his ass.
Wouldn't that make him a woman in his own words then? He was loud and cocky before he was doxxed, but now he's trying to cover his ass.
Last edited:
J
JU 199
Guest
kiwifarms.net
The Chick academy instructors page
Considering how Miss Coolidge and Pink are probably ______ himself, the description of these fictional tutors is enlightening. No wonder he knows so much about sucking cock.
Considering how Miss Coolidge and Pink are probably ______ himself, the description of these fictional tutors is enlightening. No wonder he knows so much about sucking cock.
Last edited by a moderator:
G
GS 281
Guest
kiwifarms.net
While you are DELETE. FUCKING. EVERYTHING. you might want to... you know... This one.
http://manhood101.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=527
http://manhood101.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=527
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2015
https://archive.is/http://manhood101.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=527*
Done. Now @manhood101.com can proceed to DFE.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
All this shit happens when I fall asleep. Wow, guys. You just keep finding more and more shit on him that I need to watch later.
J
JU 199
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Here's a zip of that webpage. We wouldn't want anything to happen to it now, would we
From page 10 of that thread
O
ON 190
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Someone's had/having marriage problems.
G
GS 281
Guest
kiwifarms.net
We should probably archive all his debates. Also, for his stupid youtube videos, what are the absolute best examples of what this guy stands for? There are people who should see his crazy antics, but you can't throw it all at them and expect them to consume it.
No one needs to debate him at this point to learn a single thing about him, but there are plenty of people on youtube who could use his material for their own content. We should help them see what they are missing out on.
She got it wrong and she should know. There are others like her and many with many, many more views to their average video. They should be notified.
No one needs to debate him at this point to learn a single thing about him, but there are plenty of people on youtube who could use his material for their own content. We should help them see what they are missing out on.
She got it wrong and she should know. There are others like her and many with many, many more views to their average video. They should be notified.
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2014
I know that this is late, but holy shiat, does he live in Culpepper? Or is that a vacation photo?
Jace have you returned?
I may have a cow living near me.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
I will send her another message. She didn't reply to my first one though.
R
RV 229
Guest
kiwifarms.net
IDK if this has been answered already, but I'm not going through 38 pages to find out.
If I pay the bills and protect my boyfriend at night, can I come to manhood academy? Can I send my boyfriend to chick academy?
If I pay the bills and protect my boyfriend at night, can I come to manhood academy? Can I send my boyfriend to chick academy?
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2015
Nah. Our friend Charles would reject you for being a woman and thus being inferior and having no benefit from his stellar educational techniques.
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
Apparently. You really have to hear how he goes on about marriage in his two hour long sperg vids. It's a lot to go through.
And the culty grooming.
