💊 Manosphere manhood101.com - The Cuck Academy

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I really don't think they understand how debates work.
No they don't which is why most people won't debate them because there's no proper structure to it.

A debate is in part putting your best ideas forth, allowing your opponent to put theirs forth and then challenging your opponent's points. Each section is timed. There's a moderator to determine if the points being made are valid but beyond that the moderator has actually little to do with the actual debate itself.

In the end, if you're really narcissistic, you can poll the audience to see who they feel won the debate which is why I often say the winner is not the one that had the best point or presented their POV better but the one who is able to speak better than the other one. And let's get real here because this is what debates come down to. It's not about finding the truth. It's not about putting your views forward. It's about who speaks and argues the best.
 
No they don't which is why most people won't debate them because there's no proper structure to it.

A debate is in part putting your best ideas forth, allowing your opponent to put theirs forth and then challenging your opponent's points. Each section is timed. There's a moderator to determine if the points being made are valid but beyond that the moderator has actually little to do with the actual debate itself.

In the end, if you're really narcissistic, you can poll the audience to see who they feel won the debate which is why I often say the winner is not the one that had the best point or presented their POV better but the one who is able to speak better than the other one. And let's get real here because this is what debates come down to. It's not about finding the truth. It's not about putting your views forward. It's about who speaks and argues the best.

I've always thought the ideal for a debate is to reach a middle ground. You may not agree with your opponent, but you respect their performance. If they were really good, they may have even caused you to question aspects of your own position.

A debate is supposed to be respectful because, in the end, both sides are probably missing something.
 
Ten bucks says Professor has never been in a real argument in meatspace (except with his mom) and is incapable of making eye contact and avoids talking to people in public.
 
I've always thought the ideal for a debate is to reach a middle ground. You may not agree with your opponent, but you respect their performance. If they were really good, they may have even caused you to question aspects of your own position.

A debate is supposed to be respectful because, in the end, both sides are probably missing something.
It can be like that but more often it's each gives their opening statements. Followed by each one giving their POV. Followed by a rebuttal on both sides which can be an attack or a way of shedding light on the flaws in the other's statements. Followed by a response on both sides and then a closing statement. And all of these portions are timed which is the responsibility of the moderator.

What anybody would get with Cuckmaster101 is an unstructured free for all where he talks over you, cuts you off in the middle of your statements and then allows you to make the closing statement to show how fair he is. There would be nothing fair about these debates as they'd all be done according to their rules. Did you see the video where he claims he "destroyed" his opponent? They never even got to the debate because either by accident or intent he goaded her into ragequitting by simply being an ass. She wanted to set the ground rules that there be no name calling and he had a problem with that which means either this is part of his strategy by calling somebody an offensive name as a way to rattle them or he's really incapable of arguing his point without using those terms. I'm actually hoping it's the former and not the latter but then I'd rather think somebody is playing at being stupid than actually being an idiot for real.
 
Manhood101 be like:

https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/lol-i-troll-you-jpg.27363/
 
This dude might be the best example of Poe's Law I've ever seen. I literally cannot distinguish his postings and Photoshops from something I'd expect from a troll deliberately trying to make a joke of Red Pill ideologies. If he didn't have over 10k+ posts on his forum, I wouldn't believe it.

Anyway, his voice sounds nerdy as fuck.
 
I'm surprised anyone even wants to entertain the idea of a debate with this man.

Someone who abuses jpgs and caps lock is not someone that I feel would actually stick to a proper debate format. ... Or even spout a coherent idea.
 
Not that I can see. It might start of as one bro helping another bro, but it's not long before the first bro starts thinking that he's the shit and that he knows his shit. When he sets himself up as a guru and the idiots start rocking up with cash in hand, he'll find himself working out his own personal tips and techniques to get that cash into his own hands. It's a degenerating condition. He might have started off like @slayeroftranny b'awwwing at den natsy feminininists for not recognising how magical his micro penis is, and how they're always getting the jobs he wants with all of that better qualification bullshit, but by the time the money starts truly rolling in, the only thing he believes in is his bank account. He'll mouth the words, go through the motions, but eventually he'll end up like a Christian who started a prayer circle to heal the sick, and two years later is a traveling faith healer with his own circus tent and a retinue of thirty odd actors complete with crutches and oozing sores made out of latex and dyed cornflour muck.

My feelings/thoughts about modern women and feminism actually come from successful experiences with them not excessive rejections.Although this is not a topic that I want to discuss much anymore on this forum I feel like this should be said-

The "lol u dnt get laid u buttmad" is really no different than the inflammatory troll tactics of manhood academy ala "lol u wnt do live debate mad faggot".

Ironically they also both operate from the underlying assumption that casual sex and hook up success are the pinnacle of life and that everything can be judged by that metric.

Which is the big problem with these guys,trust me.

And this is not a concept which is limited to young delusional males and "incels".

It is in fact societal and cultural.

Most young women buy into it as well.

Look at the origins of such behavior and you will find it.

Also the other thing you are commenting here is quite interesting.That is the unfortunate reality of human nature-

Power is an extremely corrupting influence and this extends far beyond the "manhood academy".

It reaches into all of human history and has a tendency to infect any enterprise no matter how noble at the beginning including even the highest levels of religion and government.

And this is something that is in fact extremely relevant to the modern day predicament.
 
The website has an offical ebook it calls the 'principals that govern social interaction'

can get it here

manhood101.com principles_101.pdf.png

In its first release, The Principles That Govern Social Interaction received over 377,417 Reads and 100 Comments in its first week on Scribd. Over 926 people gave it a combined 4.9 out of 5 stars. It was ranked #1 in the "Most Discussed, Most Favorited, Most Read and Highest Rated" categories, received the Fastest Rising Award (twice!) as well as the Featured Book Award.

I ran the PDF through word

wordcount.jpg


Holy shit. :lol:
 
So you agree with them saying that bitches should be hit for not staying in the kitchen?
As I said, I took a brief look. No, I don't agree with that. But I do agree that a woman should cook for her man.
I'm not sure if his shtick is based on what he thinks would best bait your average person or if it's just what he's found provides the best response rates to his spamming. Anyone who reacts to UR A SCARED PUSSY WHO WON'T DEBATE. Is probably going to be easy to make look dumb and also is insecure enough to fall for his promises of a new life.


@testingwaters
Maybe you see what's happening here then. Aside from his behavior what do you think of his motives? Do you agree he's fishing for insecure young men so that he can college 21/mo under the pretense that he can convert 7% of them to successful popular winners?
I'm curious how you feel about UN FUCKING YOUR LIFE AND EXERCISING YOUR BALLS FOR 21/MONTH
I don't need to pay for that shit.

I was once sorta love shy. I wasn't great with women, although I still got some action because I wasn't a total deviant fucktard like these losers. But then I took off the fucking feminism blinders and realized that all I've been told about women, dating, and gender roles was a lie. Women aren't these cute innocent creatures waiting for a white knight, they are just as bad as us Bros. And evolution like it or not has created men and women to perform different gender roles, and trying to make us perfectly equal is trying to stick a square peg in a circle hole. Once I realized this and stooped being a total pussy, women started coming to me, not me having to chase them around. Usually I'd still have to make the first move, but then rather than texting them the next day like a crazy mofo, I'd lay off and they'd contact me back. And I'd ignore them a bit, which only intrigue them bitches more cuz they ain't never had a man who wasn't thirsty as fuck.

Anyone who needs to pay to open his eyes is a worthless faggot. Just try it for a month. Stop believing the feminist bs and open your eyes. You may or may not get any ass, but I guar fucking tee you your life gonna be better.
 
The website has an offical ebook it calls the 'principals that govern social interaction'

can get it here




I ran the PDF through word

View attachment 63337

Holy shit. :lol:

Scribd, before it went all mainstream and became the "Netflix of books" where you can pay a monthly fee to read books from major publishers, was a place where anyone anywhere could dump whatever documents they're working on. Given that I highly doubt it was able to beat out mainstream fiction for top anything, I bet he's counting that winner ranking from the pre-2013 days when it had to compete against shitty fanfiction written by 16 year olds and some guy's internet startup business plan.

Basically, it's the equivalent of an author saying that his book is good because it's on the NYTimes Bestseller list.
 
Last edited:
woman should cook for her man.
How about a man that can cook for himself and not have to rely on anyone to do it for him? Is that a novel idea for you? Wow! Let me guess though that's HER place? Is that your meaning?
 
How about a man that can cook for himself and not have to rely on anyone to do it for him? Is that a novel idea for you? Wow! Let me guess though that's HER place? Is that your meaning?
Fuck, bit Powerlevel-y but I'm a dude, I cook and bake, and you know what? If a woman wants to cook for me, good on her, but I'm not going to expect it like it's some given right. That's just a sad little loner's idea of what a relationship should be like.
 
How about a man that can cook for himself and not have to rely on anyone to do it for him? Is that a novel idea for you? Wow! Let me guess though that's HER place? Is that your meaning?

When he talks about a woman cooking for him he means his mom heating up his Hot Pockets in a microwave.
 
Back
Top Bottom