💊 Manosphere manhood101.com - The Cuck Academy

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Koumori said:
You lost the debate because most of you didn't present arguments, and those that did, couldn't elaborate on them.
Click to expand...

I am perfectly willing to allow Charles Gellman to walk away with the gold trophy for the Special Olympics. I'm much more interested in hauling his cult and his opinions out into the open light than I am in competing in whatever that was supposed to be, back there.
 
Manhood academy has a very flawed view of power and authority.

And yes his behavior is relevant because it demonstrates his dysfunctional relationship with the above.
 
Loxiozzz said:
Is it really trolling if he came here spamming us first? Listen to the whole thing. There was literally no argument, just him being angry.
Click to expand...

From my perspective this community came off unreasonable. Giggling, trolling, refusing to give consent - you didn't come off looking better than him.
 
Koumori said:
From my perspective this community came off unreasonable. Giggling, trolling, refusing to give consent - you didn't come off looking better than him.
Click to expand...

This entire thread is a testament to how the sweeping, statistical majority of the human race is better than him.

Take your grubby, little mittens off of that entirely inconsequential shouting tournament and stop trying to derail the focus on the perceived loss of an impotent, idiotic snippet of autism rather than focusing on the objectively undebatable fact that Charles Gellman is a fanatical prat who is willfully exposing his ridiculous drivel and vitriol to a prepubescent audience.
 
Koumori said:
From my perspective this community came off unreasonable. Giggling, trolling, refusing to give consent - you didn't come off looking better than him.
Click to expand...
Then present what are his arguments (not the members here) in that 40-minute debate. I'm willing to give you as much time as you can for this.

You said that the members here don't present any arguments, and there are only a few who did and they only made vague ones. Now if that's the case, manhood should make some arguments for these vague arguments. Show them what they are then.
 
Is the part when I tell his students that they shouldn't be surrounding themselves with other toxic men and forming their own opinions in the debate or was it omitted? I am not autistic or insecure enough to listen to him jabber on.

God, I was so fucking bored with his 'debate' I literally forgot what he was saying and when he repeated his stupid question I was so fucking dumbfounded that I left and decided to contemplate death in my kitchen while I fed the cat.

In all honestly my cat mewling at me for food was more interesting than that ditzy DILF did.

His 'students' obviously smart enough to on their own opinions rather than all the backwash garbage Charlaaaay was saying. Except the black one, the black one obviously has some daddy issues he needs to fix with CHARLAAAAY.
 
Last edited:
Koumori said:
Just trolling. Convenient. A picture to help describe this situation:

LOL-I-TROLL-YOU.png
Click to expand...
OrvfZDn.png
 
Alan Pardew said:
Then present what are his arguments (not the members here) in that 40-minute debate. I'm willing to give you as much time as you can for this.

You said that the members here don't present any arguments, and there are only a few who did and they only made vague ones. Now if that's the case, manhood should make some arguments for these vague arguments. Show them what they are then.
Click to expand...

That's a dishonest challenge, because as the critics you were supposed to be the ones to challenge his ideas. His rebuttals against the points of the few people who spoke up were variations of "Please elaborate", and that was the end.

Valiant said:
Is the part when I tell his students that they shouldn't be surrounding themselves with other toxic men and forming their own opinions in the debate or was it omitted? I am not autistic or insecure enough to listen to him jabber on - God, I was so fucking bored with his debate I forgot what he was saying and when he repeated his stupid question I fucking left and contemplated death in my kitchen while I fed my cat, in all honestly my fucking cat had more interesting things to say than that ditzy DILF did.

His 'students' obviously smart enough to on their own opinions rather than all the backwash garbage Charlaaaay was saying.
Except the black one, the black one obviously has some daddy issues he needs to fix with CHARLAAAAY.
Click to expand...

Its there. You came off incoherent and nervous. He challenged you to argue why MHA was toxic or how men and women are equal and you didn't.
 
Koumori said:
That's a dishonest challenge, because as the critics you were supposed to be the ones to challenge his ideas. His rebuttals against the points of the few people who spoke up were variations of "Please elaborate", and that was the end.



Its there. You came off incoherent and nervous. He challenged you to argue why MHA was toxic or how men and women are equal and you didn't.
Click to expand...

Are you the black guy?
 
Koumori said:
His rebuttals against the points of the few people who spoke up were variations of "Please elaborate", and that was the end.
Click to expand...
Koumori said:
I meant his general rhetoric (the ebook), not the arguments he made in the video. The only arguments he made in the video was against accusations such as him being a PUA, an MRA, scam artists or a woman abuser.
Click to expand...
lol
 
It's HK-47 said:
This entire thread is a testament to how the sweeping, statistical majority of the human race is better than him.

Take your grubby, little mittens off of that entirely inconsequential shouting tournament and stop trying to derail the focus on the perceived loss of an impotent, idiotic snippet of autism rather than focusing on the objectively undebatable fact that Charles Gellman is a fanatical prat who is willfully exposing his ridiculous drivel and vitriol to a prepubescent audience.
Click to expand...

I don't think so. He legitimately wants to help men form relationships, and his ideas has tanked public scrutiny for years. The monthly fee to attend Manhood Academy is OPTIONAL. He takes students in for free if they can't pay.
 
Koumori said:
I don't think so. He legitimately wants to help men form relationships, and his ideas has tanked public scrutiny for years. The monthly fee to attend Manhood Academy is OPTIONAL. He takes students in for free if they can't pay.
Click to expand...
No because he's a faggot that cowers every time someone wants to have a legit debate with him, like that Mad Shangi YouTuber that I linked a video from and you're a faggot too.
 
Koumori said:
That's a dishonest challenge, because as the critics you were supposed to be the ones to challenge his ideas. His rebuttals against the points of the few people who spoke up were variations of "Please elaborate", and that was the end.



Its there. You came off incoherent and nervous. He challenged you to argue why MHA was toxic or how men and women are equal and you didn't.
Click to expand...
Ok, honest couple of questions:
-How exactly would anyone have done that? He mutes anyone who starts to make a point so he can stand on his soapbox and have a little fit. He screams about censorship and censors everyone.
-How big is your dick?
-Is there truth to the allegations that he allows black people in?
-Have you ever been cheated on by a SO?
 
Dynastia said:
Are you the black guy?
Click to expand...

No, I'm a third party observer. I'm not part of the academy yet, but I may be in the future.

dollarhuviya said:
No because he's a faggot that cowers every time someone wants to have a legit debate with him, like that Mad Shangi YouTuber that I linked a video from and you're a faggot too.
Click to expand...

I've listened to other debates and he's always given his opponents a chance to make statements and rebutt, including this forum.
 
Koumori said:
I don't think so. He legitimately wants to help men form relationships, and his ideas has tanked public scrutiny for years. The monthly fee to attend Manhood Academy is OPTIONAL. He takes students in for free if they can't pay.
Click to expand...

I wholly fail to see how the latter half of your post has any relative information towards the topic at hand.

As for the prior, for such an unfaltering paragon of a family man, he has an uncommonly powerful, vested interest in surrounding himself with prepubescent boys and teaching them how to force their genitalia into members of the opposite sex through means of violence, if necessary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom