The Looksmax Pedo thing reminded me of something I always wondered about Virgin Seeking. And sadly it's a rambling query.
Now, there is a correlation between body count and all sorts of bad relationship outcomes. It's true. But, it's hard to imagine a species closely related to chimps has an Achilles Heel in premarital sex. It's probably genetic variation that can be expressed in a time when divorce and consequences for failed relationships have never been lower. Especially since humans are good at making excuses for attractive enough women and slutty behavior, stigmas against frigid women, and lots of taboos about men who look for inexperienced women (which have predated modern feminism). And in general Environmental Explanations, which sexual history would be, fall short once genetic confounded is ruled out (women who have Slutty Genes will also have a larger sexual history and vice versa).
But these guys clearly think a dick entering a vagina changes a woman's brain, right? Like if they had a time machina and could go back to scoop up a Belle Delphine before she was a whore do they think they could expect a stable married life with her? Because I would assume she was going to grow up to be sexually impulsive the same way it was encoded how tall she'd be as an adult. Do they think a woman who has so-far slept with a single thug is a safer bet than a woman who had two Ivy League boyfriends? If a girl is blatantly slutty but just hasn't had sex yet, or better yet just hasn't "had a boyfriend", is she more stable than a woman whose sole ex died in a freak car accident?
I hope I'm not jumping around and I'm making sense but clearly a woman's associations are more informative than incidentally lacking any (and purely on account of her age, not her choices). My last example, the "never had a boyfriend" one, is sort of important because that has become a big red flag of women who are highly promiscuous but want deniability. So all that's changing is the Lying Meta.
Honestly? Fuck all that. Try to find a girl that's nice and is compatible with you, but don't ask about past relationships or anything like that.
Most women in their 20's will have more bodies on them than a man of the same age, what can we do about it? We either go back to the 1800s or we just accept that there's nothing that we can do. I used to be so caught up in that type of shit that even if one girl wanted something to do with me, knowing that she had been with someone i knew turned me off completetly (still does, tbh), but unless i want to stay indoors forever and do nothing but goon and play vydia, i'll have to accept that all of them got caught up in the whole late feminism shit, they drank the Kool-Aid.
Could you change these girls into being less promiscuous by telling them that waiting until marriage rocks or that getting fucked by randos won't make them feel good about themselves? Yes. You need a strong father figure. Divorce rates went up, promiscuity also went up.
At this point in time you can't hope you will find a girl with 0 body count, you can only hope that you will be the last person she will be having sex with, that's the only thing i can hope to control.
Edit: Just don't go into a relationship with someone like Morgpie that you know is a busted up hoe. I'm talking about normal women, not literal whores with OFs and Pornhub accounts.
Music producer "F1lthy" recently had a set at rap festival rolling loud where he brought out Idubbbz documentary topic Airsoftfatty and possibly the only funny jew matan evans to play terraria. I'm pretty sure this is a regular thing for him he loves normie lolcows much like Danny Brown.
A new study shows that individuals with similar levels of autistic traits are naturally drawn to one another. Brain scans reveal they use alternative, highly effective neural strategies to connect, challenging traditional deficit-based models of autism.
A new study shows that individuals with similar levels of autistic traits are naturally drawn to one another. Brain scans reveal they use alternative, highly effective neural strategies to connect, challenging traditional deficit-based models of autism.
Sounds like peak modern pseudoscientific reaching for conclusion on poor data and analysis.
eta: they didn't even study proper 100% organic autistics, just self-reports... the only conclusion to draw is "people with similar personality traits may be more compatible, proper study needed".
When you talk about TheQuartering this week, please brag about the role that autistic archivers and archiving tools played.
PreserveTube saved the TISM podcast from getting nuked by Jeremy, getting a shoutout from co-host Bearing.
Another autist saved all the comments under those videos, so they aren't lost after a re-upload. He says he has them all in JSON, if you want another dataset for your AI search to play with.
And of course the Jeralyzer has the transcripts of most of his videos. (I think it's now closer to 100% but I can't find a later post.)
This reinforces some legal defenses of archiving/free use that are obviously relevant to KF, and it's a good chance to hype up the forthcoming USIPS archive site.
Edit: Just don't go into a relationship with someone like Morgpie that you know is a busted up hoe. I'm talking about normal women, not literal whores with OFs and Pornhub accounts.
We definitely all agree there. We all know, instinctively, there’s nothing morally pure about conflating these things and “convincing yourself” of pedophilia in the process.
Edited because if someone skimmed it it would look like I was calling out user Nigger Cattle, which I would never.
The daughter of Larry Elison (Oracle) is the CEO of Annapurna Interactive, the studio that made it.
The reviewer gift boxes were insane, consisting of hundreds of $$ of swag, an old-school portable cd player (matching the game one) with headphones, etc.
The game licensed BIG name music titles, that absolutely NO indie studio could afford. Bands include: Devo, The Smashing Pumpkins, Iggy Pop, Joy Division, The Cure, and Alice Coltrane. Who the fuck could afford these groups?
TL;DR - it's nepo-baby goyslop that will lose millions, but Larry Elison's daughter DGAF.
Chris-chan's lineage has been traced directly back to the prophet Muhammad. If I am reading this right, he is Muhammad's 38-times-great grandson (presumably tens or hundreds of thousands of people have a similar claim, but it's still fun)
During yesterdays MATI Null brings up how if you went back like 10 years ago the only people who gave a single shit about "looksmaxxing" were weird Elliot Rodger types and it was extremely niche. Forums like /r9k/, Sluthate and Lookism are the ones I remember hearing about at the time. Maybe several thousand people worldwide who even knew what it was. It becoming mainstream is a sign of something very bad going on in our society and culture. This was something that used to not exist outside of super recluse neckbeard circles.
Things just spread faster than ever, it's like all the people that couldn't find Israel on a map (still can't probably) suddenly started repeating chudly opinions just because instagram started letting it trend. The most normie people you can find use phrases that maybe even 5, but definitely 10 years ago would have been niche. You don't have to find a forum somewhere, you just scroll forever on instagram or tiktok and pick it up, and that's exactly what young people are doing all day
x 24 