💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Another spooky game stream suggestion: Dredge is a fishing game with some spooky elements. I like playing it around this time of year
Fishy.jpg
 
Give CloverPit a try. It just came out and if you want the Bossman experience with spooky vibes, go for it. It's fun.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=CtX2WIBqsds
If only all gambling addicts had to get locked into contraptions like this.
Another spooky game stream suggestion: Dredge is a fishing game with some spooky elements. I like playing it around this time of year
View attachment 7982205
If Josh wants more walking simulators, he could do The Shore
1759274966698.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TLDR: CORPO answer to wikipidea question while block & censor wikipidiea.
1759274952334.png 1759274998445.png 1759275097895.png
...
TLDRs;
Musk proposes “Grokipedia,” an AI-driven alternative to Wikipedia aimed at fixing errors and reducing bias.
Grok would use synthetic corrections to rewrite information drawn from Wikipedia, books, and other online sources.
Past disputes highlight Musk’s longstanding dissatisfaction with Wikipedia’s neutrality and portrayal of his biography.
Experts warn AI rewriting raises ethical risks, echoing tensions seen in Wikipedia’s failed AI summary trial.
Elon Musk has once again taken aim at Wikipedia, hinting at the creation of a new knowledge resource he calls “Grokipedia.”

Speaking on the All-In Podcast, Musk revealed that his artificial intelligence startup, xAI, is building tools within its chatbot Grok to automatically detect inaccuracies in online content and rewrite them into cleaner, more reliable entries.

The billionaire entrepreneur suggested that Grok’s “synthetic corrections” could become the foundation for an alternative database to Wikipedia, one designed to strip out errors, omissions, and what he views as ideological bias. If realized, Grokipedia would represent one of the most direct challenges yet to the world’s largest crowdsourced encyclopedia.

Musk pushes Grok beyond chatbot functions
According to Musk, Grok’s upgraded system reviews data from sources such as Wikipedia, books, and websites, then reprocesses the information by filtering out inconsistencies. Unlike traditional fact-checking, this process uses AI-generated “corrections” to synthesize knowledge into what Musk describes as a more objective version of truth.

“Wikipedia has a lot of great content,” Musk said, “but it’s not free of errors or bias. Grok can help clean that up.”

This proposal marks Musk’s latest move to differentiate xAI’s Grok from competitors like ChatGPT or Gemini, positioning it as not just a conversational bot but a tool for reshaping the internet’s knowledge base.
..
Elon Musk plans to take on Wikipedia with his own rival encyclopedia site.

On Tuesday, the Tesla CEO tweeted that his xAI startup is building Grokipedia, which he claims will be a “massive improvement” over Wikipedia. Musk has long had a gripe with Wikipedia, accusing it of being “woke” and even calling for it to be defunded. (The encyclopedia site has long relied on donations.) In January, Musk also railed at Wikipedia for adding an entry about him allegedly making a Nazi-like salute at a Trump inauguration event.
To create Grokipedia, Musk plans on tapping xAI's Grok chatbot (which he also created as an alternative to another technology he didn't like, ChatGPT). Grok has been trained on web data, including public tweets. In a podcast earlier this month, Musk suggested that Grok is smart enough not only to replicate the work of human community volunteers who maintain and update Wikipedia, but also to account for any bias or inaccuracies.

“Grok is using heavy amounts of inference compute to look at, as an example, a Wikipedia page, what is true, partially true, or false, or missing in this page,” he said. "Now rewrite the page to correct, remove the falsehoods, correct the half-truths, and add the missing context.” (That said, Grok has suffered its own share of problems, including praising Hitler.)

Musk’s Tuesday tweet didn’t say when Grokipedia would launch. But it’ll likely attract an audience of Musk supporters and right-wing pundits who also claim Wikipedia has a liberal bias.
Wikipedia has faced internal conflicts among community editors over how certain events are portrayed. However, Musk's critics, including Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales, argue that the free online encyclopedia has focused on accuracy, whereas Musk's X has faced accusations that it's a hub of misinformation. In 2023, Wales also criticized the changes that Musk made to Twitter after acquiring it, saying the platform had become “overrun by trolls and lunatics.”

Beating Wikipedia won’t be easy; the free online encyclopedia is the seventh most-visited website in the world. Still, Musk is betting he can disrupt the status quo. Last month, the billionaire also tweeted his plan to take on Microsoft by creating a new business called “Macrohard” dedicated to releasing rival software products with the help of AI.
 
It pains me that Elon is the guy to do this stuff, but I guess it's better this retard than no one at all.
 
Is there a name for a consultant that helps you sign your name? Everyone cries about my signature and I'm sick of it. I don't give a fuck and I'd sign with an X like an illiterate nigger but apparently this actually matters to people so I guess I have to give a shit about it.

Trying to persuade people is painful like ass cancer to me. Everyone is a stupid monkey fuck and I have to impress them to get what I want.
 
Is there a name for a consultant that helps you sign your name? Everyone cries about my signature and I'm sick of it. I don't give a fuck and I'd sign with an X like an illiterate nigger but apparently this actually matters to people so I guess I have to give a shit about it.

Trying to persuade people is painful like ass cancer to me. Everyone is a stupid monkey fuck and I have to impress them to get what I want.
Just sign your name with proper cursive and tell everyone to piss off
 
Is there a name for a consultant that helps you sign your name? Everyone cries about my signature and I'm sick of it. I don't give a fuck and I'd sign with an X like an illiterate nigger but apparently this actually matters to people so I guess I have to give a shit about it.

Trying to persuade people is painful like ass cancer to me. Everyone is a stupid monkey fuck and I have to impress them to get what I want.
No idea about consultants, but you could just check some calligraphy. A nigger from work had GREAT handwriting, because he learned calligraphy in relation to baseball because he was competing or something, IDK, he might have been bullshitting.
 
Is there a name for a consultant that helps you sign your name? Everyone cries about my signature and I'm sick of it. I don't give a fuck and I'd sign with an X like an illiterate nigger but apparently this actually matters to people so I guess I have to give a shit about it.

Trying to persuade people is painful like ass cancer to me. Everyone is a stupid monkey fuck and I have to impress them to get what I want.
A notary?

but my favorite sig has always been Screenshot from 2025-09-30 18-08-12.png

Also, I don't know if it was old school, autistic, or female of me to practice my signature over and over and over until I "got it down". That certain turn on the S, the way the P connects/disconnects, the way the N's have to be in shorthand. It was a process. But I also remember one of my professors telling us when she got married, she practiced writing her name/married name until she was happy with it. I will always be able to pick out my personal signature because nobody will ever be able to capture the crazy in the name alone.

Hey if anything, check out Gregg shorthand and make a jpg of your signature from that.
 
Last edited:
Is there a name for a consultant that helps you sign your name? Everyone cries about my signature and I'm sick of it. I don't give a fuck and I'd sign with an X like an illiterate nigger but apparently this actually matters to people so I guess I have to give a shit about it.

Trying to persuade people is painful like ass cancer to me. Everyone is a stupid monkey fuck and I have to impress them to get what I want.
use a Digital sigture or don't care its just hate orbiter (alogs) try to stop your progress.
remember current day people don't know siganture format.
 
Will Null's signature be the Kiwi Farms mangosteen? Find out in this week's exciting episode of Mad at the Internet!
 
Is there a name for a consultant that helps you sign your name? Everyone cries about my signature and I'm sick of it. I don't give a fuck and I'd sign with an X like an illiterate nigger but apparently this actually matters to people so I guess I have to give a shit about it.

Trying to persuade people is painful like ass cancer to me. Everyone is a stupid monkey fuck and I have to impress them to get what I want.
 
Is there a name for a consultant that helps you sign your name? Everyone cries about my signature and I'm sick of it. I don't give a fuck and I'd sign with an X like an illiterate nigger but apparently this actually matters to people so I guess I have to give a shit about it.

Trying to persuade people is painful like ass cancer to me. Everyone is a stupid monkey fuck and I have to impress them to get what I want.
"hua" is the hardest three letter combo in cursive, I swear. I'd leave it off in all honesty. Here is my random ass aesthetic opinion:

0. Rule of Cool. As long as it looks cool do whatever the fuck you want. Sign with a German type-faced style monogram if you want to.
1. Play with diagonality. You can fit multiple letters together aesthetically, like the o into the s of Josh.
2. Don't think everything needs to be properly cased. Used a print letter if it looks good. The only way I got "hua" to seem appealing was to make the space between h and a capital A be a U.
3. Don't worry about order or leaving out letters. Throw the oo of of your last time on top of the M if you feel like. Honestly, I'd sign with a very diagonal MN and leave the oo out.

1759282547997.png
 
Is there a name for a consultant that helps you sign your name? Everyone cries about my signature and I'm sick of it. I don't give a fuck and I'd sign with an X like an illiterate nigger but apparently this actually matters to people so I guess I have to give a shit about it.

Trying to persuade people is painful like ass cancer to me. Everyone is a stupid monkey fuck and I have to impress them to get what I want.
Im a retard. So my opinion isnt worth much. But I would want to lean in to my shitty signature to spite them.
But I suppose you probably have higher intentions than I.

Responding to others:
"hua" doesnt seem hard to me. I was able to air-write it multiple times with ease. Though, 90% of my writing at school was cursive, so who knows. Maybe Im exceptional.
The JoshA image doesnt really look good to me. I don't really see the u.

If there is high intent behind it, then ought we look at other examples of signatures from politically-minded fellers?

Lol
Screenshot_20250930_212852_Firefox.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom