💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Nervous Corporate Sponsors Retreat from New York Pride
The New York Times (archive)

Maybe you want to keep this on the back burner. The MATI preceding Pride Prude Month is May 30, first Prude MATI is June 6.

TorrentFreak: EU Piracy Watchlist Adds IPFS, FitGirl and Njalla (archive)
According to the EU report, Njalla appears to do more than simply registering domains for its customers. Allegedly, it allows people to launch a complete pirate site using the service.

“This off-the-shelf piracy facilitation service makes it easy for would-be pirates to create and monetise a fully functioning pirate service,” the EU report reads.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
sorry if this is annoying but does anyone know which episode the Fuck You/blockland forums ep is? i was watching old archives and he mentioned it in passing but i haven't been able to find it (:_(
 
IMG_0522.webp
Some fanart from xitter

Also, please find time to shit on Canada, Danke.
 
nouanced opinion said:
Null, can you please give your take either here or on MATI whether Kurt, Sean and others are copyright cucks for striking Rekieta using their voices for AI superchats?
Is Nick right on this one?
Click to expand...
Pelican Bones said:
It isn't a copyright issue.
Click to expand...
It should fall under "personality rights", and I wouldn't be surprised to see federal legislation on unauthorized AI voice cloning within the next 5 years. Have fun while you still can (legally).
 
nouanced opinion said:
Null, can you please give your take either here or on MATI whether Kurt, Sean and others are copyright cucks for striking Rekieta using their voices for AI superchats?
Is Nick right on this one?
Click to expand...
Ordinarily I'd say using AI to create imitations of people is parody, but there's a distinct lack of actual justification for taking someone's voice and then selling people the ability to use it. That's not really parody. Ultimately I'd rather live in a world with no copyright than the one we live in now, but there's a really valid case against letting people endlessly exploit someone else's assets without permission, which is what Rekieta and his pedophile gimp are doing. On a more basic level people are going to be inherently against letting people use their own likeness, and especially when it's a grimy pedophile and his child neglecting skeleton doing it.
 
Null said:
especially when it's a grimy pedophile and his child neglecting skeleton doing it.
Click to expand...
And especially especially when the point is mostly to have the target's voice saying - in essence - "I've always loved sucking little boy cocks" then going "SEE? HE SAID IT!"
 
"I'd pick ten million lolicons..."
After the posts in this thread this past week, what a trip it is to read this
 
To be fair, card/banking companies are severely fucking evil and not to be compared with just some fucking degen on the internet, no no. They are worse.
I am not a hunted man like Josh (Sorry if you cringed at that, Jersh), but its still fucking abhorrent how I need to take 20 different steps just so PayPal doesn't fucking doxx me for RECEIVING MONEY AT ANY GIVEN TIME. I did set up the business account properly, so things are looking great now. But still, what an unnecesary hassle. These fucking freaks really do like to humilliate you and take control of you.
 
I doubly submit this song for the opener or closer.
It's so hilariously dower and sad boi that I think it will fit with complaining about the goings on in the world, on the Internet, and in this thread.

Also it ties in if you talk about the fertility clinic bombing.

Also also it is so stupendously bad and fart huffy that it is a certified Canadian hood classic.
 
Null, here is the reminder you asked for:
Last week, right before the Null vs. Ralph IBS. Our esteemed host had on another caller. The guest represented himself as Jared Taylor, but I did a little digging, and actually, dear Ralphamales, it looks like it may have been the famous "This is Water" speech by the late, great David Foster Wallace.

I have edited the Internet bloodsports: Ralph vs. David Foster Wallace for you below, with the animated subtitles covering up that picture of Ralph and Cozy Rozy (named after Roseanne Barr):
Moments:
@0:26 - *The IBS begins*
@1:48 - no no no
@2:25 - Didactic
@4:13 - *Ralph really loses the plot* and starts hollerin' proper
@6:43 - I control this
@7:12 - *Japanese Males*
@9:35 - *you are the dumbest motherfucker - hyperbole*
@11:30 - *Ralph does start to realize there is a speech occuring*, but he thinks it is Jared speaking before a mass of Japanese people laughing at Ralph.

 
I also think that
>Huh? You think this take from person X is correct?
>Then that must mean you also agree with that other take from the same person on a completely different subject matter, right?
I see people on multiple sides of multiple discussions use this and it has always been retarded. Yes, a person can in fact be correct about one thing while being wrong about another.
Yes, Chibi can be a pedophile snitch with cringe takes on loli while also being correct on the insidiousness of payment processors.

Pretending that the sky is green just because one chomo said it was blue is mentally ill behaviour.
 
Dear Null,
Thank you for showing Tyler Kolbe's emails. Please accept this hamster, instead of whatever bribe he will inevitably accuse me of paying you.
nullhamster.webp
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom