💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
AnOminous said:
And then the moment you put in a claim, your policy is null and void because you lied and committed insurance fraud. On top of that you committed a felony. You realize they can tell, right? That shit is in your lungs for 10+ years after you stop.
Click to expand...
If you are so down bad that you need to own insurance to pay for medical problems then you should probably not be a smoker. Also by this logic there is no point to quitting because they will just fight you. I lied forever and even quit long enough to get the negative nicotine test. What am I supposed to do? call the insurance company the minute I bum a smoke at the bar? Am I supposed to call them the moment I enter a cigar lounge? Just lie.
 
Part of the issue with targeting CEOs is that I don't know that you can trust the average justice enjoyer to put in the work to know that they're doing the right thing.

Imagine United's next CEO is somehow genuinely altruistic, constantly fights with his board and the bean-counters to try to do right by people. They obviously can't approve every claim (see: life-saving gender affirming care) but they want to start changing things for the better.

Then some guy gets denied his liposuction by a grumpy underpaid jeet at some local office, and he freaks out and goes straight for the top and kills this theoretically altruistic CEO. The cold, unfeeling system failed him, not that specific guy.

In light of this, what can any given actually good CEO do to spare themselves? No one actually knows any of them, we just assume they must be responsible for everything bad that happens. Every single one of them has some form of personal marketing campaign talking about all the good things they've done so that's not a reliable metric either.

It's not reasonable to say that the price of being a CEO, regardless of your personal actions, stances or beliefs, is to get merked. Because then they'll say, fine, for security purposes we no longer release any personally identifying information about any of our staff, they all reside in secure bunkers and perform all work by video conference. Or they'll say there are now no CEOs. AI is our CEO, we put it in charge. You can't kill that.

When there's no action you can take to demonstrate that you don't deserve to be killed, the only thing you CAN do is double down on security. Or, alternatively, society could decide to reject the idea that killing random people will solve deep-seated problems.
 
image_2024-12-27_182502511.png
Happy Boxing Day from Mr. Nubly
 
Runch said:
Part of the issue with targeting CEOs is that I don't know that you can trust the average justice enjoyer to put in the work to know that they're doing the right thing.

Imagine United's next CEO is somehow genuinely altruistic, constantly fights with his board and the bean-counters to try to do right by people. They obviously can't approve every claim (see: life-saving gender affirming care) but they want to start changing things for the better.

Then some guy gets denied his liposuction by a grumpy underpaid jeet at some local office, and he freaks out and goes straight for the top and kills this theoretically altruistic CEO. The cold, unfeeling system failed him, not that specific guy.
Click to expand...
Teenagers sign up every day to fight retard wars for Penny's. Maybe CEOs should have a little fear in their lives for their millions in salary. If F1 drivers had no risk they would just hold their foot down and send it. Something has to keep them on their toes .
 
Hamstirer said:
Teenagers sign up every day to fight retard wars for Penny's. Maybe CEOs should have a little fear in their lives for their millions in salary. If F1 drivers had no risk they would just hold their foot down and send it. Something has to keep them on their toes .
Click to expand...
I'm saying that them feeling that fear is of no benefit to anyone. There is no motivation to do better at their job, be more consumer friendly or anything, because they could be an angel and people at the bottom would still fly off the handle and decide they must be personally responsible for their woes. If that kind of fear became commonplace, all you would do is make them even more untouchable, whether through physical security, layers of obfuscation of what they actually do, or offloading responsibility for unpopular decisions to AI.
 
Runch said:
I'm saying that them feeling that fear is of no benefit to anyone. There is no motivation to do better at their job, be more consumer friendly or anything, because they could be an angel and people at the bottom would still fly off the handle and decide they must be personally responsible for their woes. If that kind of fear became commonplace, all you would do is make them even more untouchable, whether through physical security, layers of obfuscation of what they actually do, or offloading responsibility for unpopular decisions to AI.
Click to expand...


John Basil Barnhill was both a pro- and anti-socialist and the source of: "Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty."
 
Desktop User2 said:
No, it didn´t. It only gives some anaesthetic to direct action morons so they can dream of magical murders instead of political action to change the status quo.
It helped the anaesthetists tho because this shit happened when Blue Cross was reviewing their approval process. Now they can pump you full of shit that you dont need so they can earn more per procedure.
Click to expand...
If you don't want any of that shit be sure to let them know prior to your procedure so you can be in pain, awake during surgery, and vomiting your guts up postop.
Anaesthetists are the ones who are keeping you alive during your operation, they deserve to get paid their worth.

The proposals were that anaesthesia would only be paid for the length of time that surgery was estimated to take (always underestimated).
This means that the time it takes to do the pre-surgery anaesthetic procedures such as epidurals, regional blocks, central lines etc wouldn't have been included so they would be working for nothing.
Any post-op anaesthetic complications also wouldn't be reimbursed.
It was a ridiculous proposal and I'm glad it was quashed.
 
Sneeds said:
If anyone is bored and wants to see some random autism I found, here you go.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=tBW13-q8XsQ
Click to expand...
Disconcerting. It's like looking in a magic mirror where I don't have people in my life keeping me sane. The comments are weird too, a similar but spin-off name with gibberish at the end spamming timestamps? Not everybody can lose 40 IQ points and then fall down a rabbit hole where they have a conversation with commercials by enjoying syllables with varying tone and cadence, but I feel vulnerable. Ribs.
 
Hamstirer said:
1. I explain how a autistic man child that makes sonichu head necklaces out of Crayola "fucking" model magic, when let to him fucking his Mom and getting yelled at by a pig creature and a horse while being arrested, which led to pig man getting a level 11 angry for being called corn.... ECT.... ECT.... Man lobs of dick and gets angry, chinky man gets angry that other man stole his chin lights, cloud people say you can no longer click busses to confirm we aren't robots .st, lawyer does all the cocaine while fucking a dude that's not his wife, and his wife, and his wife.,..................'.......... And therefore, that s shirt represents me saying NIGGER on the internet .
Click to expand...
There is no good way to explain the background of the medallion that doesn't end with them either zoning out or really questioning their relationship with you. I have tried and those were the results.
 

Pleeeeeeeease can Zydrate Anatomy be the Dec 31st intro song with a pic of the slaughtered United Health CEO. Pretty pleeeease?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom