💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Something that tickled me about the Nick Fuentes charitable foundation rabbit hole is that he's working with someone the documents name as John Miller.

That's the same name Trump used to pretend to be someone else when he gave an interview decades ago.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/did-do...lse-in-this-1991-interview-to-defend-himself/

The idea that Nick Fuentes could be doing something similar really made me laugh.
 
You’re a Jewish big pharmaceutical shill, smoke cigarettes and chug coffee.

Piss clean up.mp4
That 5 GALLON piss jug was nearly full, bro wtf.
pisssssssss.png
 
Watching the archive now.

If no one has mentioned it. I have a solution to your jannie problem.

Outsource your jannie jobs to India. Have an entire floor of pajeets watching over the board day and night.

At first glance this sounds like a terrible idea. But really think about it. Think about how funny that would be. Having all these brown smelly people having to look at this board full of people making fun of brown smelly people. Dealing with reports and you can even open a customer service line that goes to their office.
I'd call so often the material would fill a second show
 
I tend to never comment in the thread since I'm always behind, but just another big thanks Null for making work days go by so much faster. Really loving the Gumroad content, corn startch and India were absolutely hilarious and I'm patiently waiting for the Incel one to pop up somewhere. Also, lots of good moments from multiple streams but the one that I enjoy the most recently is the Mr Nubly end of the fucking word read segments. My god those are gold and Mr Nubly himself is fascinating. An overly politicized nutcase that is actually funny to those he criticizes. Spingledidee spingledidoo indeed.

And the dustborn playthrough... only watched the first video but it's already been a fantastic barrel of laughs. Talk Show radio being the villian was not in my bingo card. I'm also amazed how everyone is such an unlikable cunt except for the MAN of the group and the robot and they also managed to not make the tranny the most hateable character in the roster, quite a feat.

Anywho, keep up the good work Jersh, it's always fun.
 
Last edited:
Oh, also, fuck anybody saying that Null laughs too much. I enjoy his weird laugh and how there is real joy behind it and not just an "ack ack ack" to self felate himself.
 
Which studios in particular were going out of there way to make sure their games were incompatible with the Steam Deck/Linux? I wanna pirate each of their games so I can bully the CEO and make him seethe over however much revenue he lost.
 
The Free and Equal Elections Foundation recently hosted its final debate. The result is, without exaggeration, the best two and a half hours of political satire ever recorded. The only problem is that this event was real and all of the people involved want to be taken seriously. Please enjoy this small clip of the political autism put on display:



The entire event, which was FUCKING HILARIOUS, can be watched on YouTube here.

I have a local archive of the entire event but the file is massive. I will take the time to convert/archive when I have more time sorry 😞.
 
Last edited:
Josh‘s commentary on Gabe Newell‘s Windows-To-Linux emulator really makes me consider to buy a cool orange lambda symbol shirt. Besides that, I‘ve had so much fun with playing the original Half-Life and its mods.
 
I’m actually really enjoying the dustporn play through and kind of flabbergasted it is doing so horribly. It’s technically well executed, it has a story, it has characters, why did it flop so absolutely hard?

I mean I wouldn’t buy it but I can imagine some people would play this. Maybe it’s mainly console? Maybe it’s a one and done?
 
Josh‘s commentary on Gabe Newell‘s Windows-To-Linux emulator really makes me consider to buy a cool orange lambda symbol shirt. Besides that, I‘ve had so much fun with playing the original Half-Life and its mods.

Gabe and Jewsh are kindred spirits. Each is an Atlas single handedly holding together their spheres of the uppercase N Niggernet.

View attachment 6563711

Stop it, this is not reddit. Enjoy the game and that's it.

Don't be a janny faggot.

I’m actually really enjoying the dustporn play through and kind of flabbergasted it is doing so horribly. It’s technically well executed, it has a story, it has characters, why did it flop so absolutely hard?

I mean I wouldn’t buy it but I can imagine some people would play this. Maybe it’s mainly console? Maybe it’s a one and done?

Games are now, and probably always were, huge time sinks. There isn't enough time in life to play every shitty game much less the good ones. I feel like everyone is cutting back on luxury items live video games since I'm sure we all have unjustifiably large back catalogs to finally get to.
 
For the News / Tranny Segment:
New York times reporting that a government funded study regarding puberty-blocking drugs will not be published because the findings would be weaponized by opponents of the "health-care".
NYT tweet - Copy.png
NYT Tweet, Archive
New York Times Article: U.S. Study on Puberty Blockers Goes Unpublished Because of Politics, Doctor Says
Archive
Article text:

U.S. Study on Puberty Blockers Goes Unpublished Because of Politics, Doctor Says​

The leader of the long-running study said that the drugs did not improve mental health in children with gender distress and that the finding might be weaponized by opponents of the care.
By Azeen Ghorayshi
Published Oct. 23, 2024Updated Oct. 24, 2024
An influential doctor and advocate of adolescent gender treatments said she had not published a long-awaited study of puberty-blocking drugs because of the charged American political environment.
The doctor, Johanna Olson-Kennedy, began the study in 2015 as part of a broader, multimillion-dollar federal project on transgender youth. She and colleagues recruited 95 children from across the country and gave them puberty blockers, which stave off the permanent physical changes — like breasts or a deepening voice — that could exacerbate their gender distress, known as dysphoria.
The researchers followed the children for two years to see if the treatments improved their mental health. An older Dutch study had found that puberty blockers improved well-being, results that inspired clinics around the world to regularly prescribe the medications as part of what is now called gender-affirming care.
But the American trial did not find a similar trend, Dr. Olson-Kennedy said in a wide-ranging interview. Puberty blockers did not lead to mental health improvements, she said, most likely because the children were already doing well when the study began.

“They’re in really good shape when they come in, and they’re in really good shape after two years,” said Dr. Olson-Kennedy, who runs the country’s largest youth gender clinic at the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles.
That conclusion seemed to contradict an earlier description of the group, in which Dr. Olson-Kennedy and her colleagues noted that one quarter of the adolescents were depressed or suicidal before treatment.
In the nine years since the study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, and as medical care for this small group of adolescents became a searing issue in American politics, Dr. Olson-Kennedy’s team has not published the data. Asked why, she said the findings might fuel the kind of political attacks that have led to bans of the youth gender treatments in more than 20 states, one of which will soon be considered by the Supreme Court.
“I do not want our work to be weaponized,” she said. “It has to be exactly on point, clear and concise. And that takes time.”

She said that she intends to publish the data, but that the team had also been delayed because the N.I.H. had cut some of the project’s funding. She attributed that cut, too, to politics, which the N.I.H. denied. (The broader project has received $9.7 million in government support to date.)
Dr. Olson-Kennedy is one of the country’s most vocal advocates of adolescent gender treatments and has served as an expert witness in many legal challenges to the state bans. She said she was concerned the study’s results could be used in court to argue that “we shouldn’t use blockers because it doesn’t impact them,” referring to transgender adolescents.
Other researchers, however, were alarmed by the idea of delaying results that would have immediate implications for families around the world.
“I understand the fear about it being weaponized, but it’s really important to get the science out there,” said Amy Tishelman, a clinical and research psychologist at Boston College who was one of the study’s original researchers.
Dr. Tishelman also noted that, even if the drugs did not lead to psychological improvements, they may have prevented some of the children from getting worse. “No change isn’t necessarily a negative finding — there could be a preventative aspect to it,” she said. “We just don’t know without more investigation.”

In the 1990s and 2000s, doctors in the Netherlands began studying a small group of children who had experienced intense gender dysphoria since early childhood. For most of these children, the negative feelings dissipated by puberty. For others, puberty made them feel worse.
For those who struggled, the researchers began prescribing puberty blockers, which had long been used to treat children whose puberty began unusually early. The Dutch scientists reasoned that by preventing the permanent changes of puberty, transgender adolescents would fare better psychologically and fit in more comfortably in society as adults.
In 2011, the researchers reported on the first 70 children who were treated with the so-called Dutch Protocol. The children were thoroughly assessed to make sure that they had persistent dysphoria and supportive parents and that they did not have serious psychiatric conditions that might interfere with treatment.
These patients showed some psychological improvements after puberty blockers: fewer depressive symptoms, as well as significant declines in behavioral and emotional problems. All the patients chose to continue their gender transitions by taking testosterone or estrogen.
The findings were highly influential even before they were published, and clinics around the world opened to treat transgender adolescents with puberty blockers and hormones.

England’s youth gender clinic in 2011 tried to replicate the Dutch results with a study of 44 children. But at a conference five years later, the British researchers reported that puberty blockers had not changed volunteers’ well-being, including rates of self-harm. Those results were not made public until 2020, years after puberty blockers had become the standard treatment for children with gender dysphoria in England.
In 2020, Dr. Olson-Kennedy’s group described the initial psychological profile of the children enrolled in the U.S. study of puberty blockers, whose average age was 11. Before receiving the drugs, around one quarter of the group reported depression symptoms and significant anxiety, and one quarter reported ever having thoughts of suicide. Eight percent reported a past suicide attempt.
In a progress report submitted to the N.I.H. at that time, Dr. Olson-Kennedy outlined her hypothesis of how the children would fare after two years on puberty blockers: that they would show “decreased symptoms of depression, anxiety, trauma symptoms, self-injury, and suicidality, and increased body esteem and quality of life over time.”
That hypothesis does not seem to have borne out. “They have good mental health on average,” Dr. Olson-Kennedy said in the interview with The New York Times. “They’re not in any concerning ranges, either at the beginning or after two years.” She reiterated this idea several times.
When asked in follow-up emails to clarify how the children could have good initial mental health when her preliminary findings had showed one quarter of them struggling, Dr. Olson-Kennedy said that, in the interview, she was referring to data averages and that she was still analyzing the full data set.
Dr. Hilary Cass, a pediatrician who this year published an extensive review of youth gender services in England, said that the delays from the American and British research groups had led the public to believe that puberty blockers improved mental health, even though scant evidence backed up that conclusion.
“It’s really important we get results out there so we understand whether it’s helpful or not, and for whom,” Dr. Cass said.
Her report found weak evidence for puberty blockers and noted some risks, including lags in bone growth and fertility loss in some patients. It prompted the National Health Service in England to stop prescribing the drugs outside of a new clinical trial, following similar pullbacks in several other European countries.
An N.I.H. spokesman said that while the agency generally encourages the publication of data supported by its grants, researchers decide how and when to do so.

Dr. Olson-Kennedy’s collaborators have also not yet published data they collected on how puberty blockers affected the adolescents’ bone development.
But many other papers have been published from the wider N.I.H. project, including a 2023 study of older transgender and nonbinary adolescents who took estrogen or testosterone to aid their gender transition. After two years on hormones, the volunteers showed improvements in life and body satisfaction, and patients taking testosterone showed declines in depression and anxiety. (Two of the 315 patients died by suicide, a rate much higher than the general population.)
Dr. Olson-Kennedy noted that doctors’ clinical experience was often undervalued in discussions of research. She has prescribed puberty blockers and hormonal treatments to transgender children and adolescents for 17 years, she said, and has observed how profoundly beneficial they can be.
Although the N.I.H. studies are large, she said, “these are minuscule compared to the amount of people that we’ve taken care of.”
Christina Jewett and Jane Ackermann contributed reporting.
Azeen Ghorayshi covers the intersection of sex, gender and science for The Times. More about Azeen Ghorayshi
A version of this article appears in print on Oct. 24, 2024, Section A, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: Doctor, Fearing Outrage, Slows A Gender Study.
It was also reported by the hill on Youtube

WOKE Doctor HIDES Puberty Blockers STUDY For TEENS B/c Of UNDESIRED Results By the Hill.

From Dr. Olsen Kennedy, A trans advocate that withheld the results of the study is quoted as saying
"I do not want our work to be weaponized it has to be exactly on point clear and concise and that takes time"
Tweets from the Hill's video:
JK Rowling tweet, archive
JK Rowling - Copy.png
Elon musk tweet, Archive
elon musk - Copy.png
Times of India Take on this tweet: 'Must not publish … ’: JK Rowling’s sarcastic take on unpublished study on puberty blockers , Archive
Quote from article: "Dr Olson-Kennedy revealed that the study, which tracked 95 children over two years, did not lead to significant mental health improvements."

TLDR: The person doing the scientific report, which involved 95 children, did not get the results that she wanted, so she suppressed the report from going public by not publishing the results, which stated that
Quote from NYT Article:
"When asked in follow-up emails to clarify how the children could have good initial mental health when her preliminary findings had showed one quarter of them struggling, Dr. Olson-Kennedy said that, in the interview, she was referring to data averages and that she was still analyzing the full data set. puberty blockers had not changed volunteers’ well-being, including rates of self-harm."
. This is not how neutral scientific studies are conducted, and due to the Streisand effect, this story is gaining traction.
 
I'm surprised he's not more popular if you look past all of the uh psychotic political ramblings he's actually a pretty talented uh cartoonist.
The Matt Walsh one is brilliant. He manages to thread the line of pleasing the faggots that think Walsh is a fucking chud monster while also making me laugh at seeing unfiltered insanity on paper form. That and he's honestly good, his depiction of hell is pretty good.
 
Back
Top Bottom