- Joined
- Jul 7, 2020
So ChudLogic brought on the two guys involved with the Chris Tyson exposé that was initially posted on KF a month or so ago, and which engendered a lot of criticism of the creator for being a sped. They talked for a long time about things, and I'll try to summarize the main takeaways thus far here. If you can stand a gaggle of people who are obviously autistic, obviously British, or both, then you can listen for yourself.
Main takeaways from what I've listened to thus far:
Pretty sure that's the best summary I can come up with at the moment. It's all very retarded and involves a lot of people who sound like retards.
Main takeaways from what I've listened to thus far:
- The creator is a Turning Point sped who idolizes James O'Keefe and was trying to use whatever connections he could find to publicize the information about Chris Tyson before he ultimately made his video. Many of those connections were retarded, e.g. EDP, Chris-chan, Charlie Kirk, etc. But he did try to give it to Turkey Tom, acheeto, Chris Hanson, Keemstar, and others. They all ignored him.
- The creator does not really buy into transgenderism but holds fast that Chris being trans has nothing to do with why he started investigating Chris, rather it was the Shadman stuff and things that had been posted around 4Chan. But he only refers to Chris as "Chris" and uses male pronouns for him.
- They recognize the format of the video was not ideal and was rushed to be put out
- The reason it was rushed to be put out was because there are apparently "police investigations" that relate to the video content but which also don't specifically relate to Chris Tyson's conduct. The guy in the videos (who goes by Prism or Priapism eww) specifically used the words "contracts," "investigations," and "police."
- Mike Clum is referenced as being involved because of his EDP video, and that they put the Chris Tyson video out in a rush because of that EDP video. No idea what that means exactly, given the "investigations" stop them from explaining themselves in detail.
- Back to Chris Tyson: the creators were being criticized about not making it clear how they knew that Chris Tyson knew the age of the underage middle schooler he was being inappropriate with online and invited out to an RV camper to spend the night in the middle of nowhere
- They claim to have proof somewhere, but the videos they made were not as good as could be and they have to find the discord messages they've saved from one of Chris Tyson's associate's discords that prove it. They also point to the underage boy having been paid by Mr. Beast's company, using that as an inference that they knew he was underage. Chris and the middle schooler also spoke together and it's hard to imagine that Chris Tyson, a college student, couldn't tell he was interacting with a 13 year old.
- They had interviewed the alleged victim of Chris Tyson under false pretenses because the guy is still very connected to Chris and looks up to him. The alleged victim commented under Prism's video that he denied all the allegations. Specifically, they interviewed the alleged victim under the guise of hiring an editor. They have that recorded but have not released it, but may do so in the future.
- Most of the criticism is that interviewing the alleged victim under false pretenses invalidates or taints everything he puts out. Lots of sperging about this, because it violates the "victim's agency" and makes the creators look like fools because things weren't done in the most shipshape form, apparently. Because the creator, Prism, tried to emulate James O'Keefe of Project Veritas, it draws lots of reactive critique based on politics.
- The creator's response is that they knew the relationship between the victim and Chris would result in a "proper" investigation tipping off Chris to DFE. And since Chris did DFE after the creators uploaded the video, they feel that they were right under the circumstances. The alleged victim is still heavily tied to Chris Tyson and Mr. Beast in a positive way (and it's really not weird to me personally that a gay grooming victim would stick up for their gay groomer who got him a job with Mr. Beast).
- Basically all the criticism seems to come down to criticizing the way in which the creators went about this, because it could get information incorrect and it was a reckless way to go about things.
- None of the critics seem to accept that the spergy creator tried to hand over info about Chris Tyson to a ton of people but nobody bit, probably because it was about Mr. Beast's pet troon. The creators of the videos about Chris Tyson seem annoyed that content creators whom they reached out to totally ignored him, but then cribbed their content when the stuff about Chris has blown up.
- My reading of the creator, Prism, is that he is a retard sperg who came across info that he tried to pawn off on people who knew what they were doing. Nobody helped. So he did it on his own, but because he's a retard who isn't a YouTube commentator the exposé did not ultimately live up to the standards to which normal commentary exposé videos are held. And now a bunch of other retards and British people are hating on him, in part for political reasons, in part because of his autistic conduct, and in part because he's aiming at a troon like Chris Tyson.
- The critics of Prism are hysterical, and there's nothing of substance that they're saying that wasn't already said by users here when Prism tried posting on KF a month ago.
Pretty sure that's the best summary I can come up with at the moment. It's all very retarded and involves a lot of people who sound like retards.
