💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Honestly, the bitrate issues aside, I don't really have an issue with the microphone quality since these shows have been some of the funniest stuff on the internet lately. Enjoy your show tomorrow, Null.
 
There's a lot of bulldog breeding and interest groups and some of them are obsessed with making bulldogs like scifi super soldiers and giving them names like "rapegod"
 

Attachments

  • GM6I2hcXYAA3DFn.jpeg
    GM6I2hcXYAA3DFn.jpeg
    131.5 KB · Views: 20
If you'd rather see a young, innocent life full of potential companionship turned into a smear of gore or worse than to turn on your hazards and carefully redirect a few cars into the other lane, I can't say I've got any interest in taking moral advice from you. Cowardly people who give no fucks and lack compassion for the innocent are a massive contributing factor towards the absolute state of modern parenting and the decay of humanity as a whole.

And you say "animal" as though it carries any bearing in this context; as though the average human is more innocent and worthy. Before "muh veganism", see the above post concerning human relations with dogs. He's spot on, and it applies to our historical little grain guards too.
1 kitten > 500 shitskins
Misplaced compassion is the exact reason the body politic of America has allowed and continues to allow a hundred million shitskins in America to victimize Americans. If you think that your value as a potential parent is far outstripped by the value of "fluffy companionship" to some unknown person there are probably far more effective ways for you to risk your life and skip out on trivialities like "raising your kids" "sharing irreplaceable experiences together" "protecting them from an indifferent world".
 
Misplaced compassion is the exact reason the body politic of America has allowed and continues to allow a hundred million shitskins in America to victimize Americans. If you think that your value as a potential parent is far outstripped by the value of "fluffy companionship" to some unknown person there are probably far more effective ways for you to risk your life and skip out on trivialities like "raising your kids" "sharing irreplaceable experiences together" "protecting them from an indifferent world".
Conflating rapeape niggers with literal kittens might have a connection to your solipsistic inability to understand what principals are and why it gets you worked up in the manner that it does. It reminds me a bit of all of the exclusively brown people who've gotten offended at the notion of humanitarian work for animals, asking why those resources aren't all being funneled exclusively to "da keedz". My point being, you're not terribly good at pretending to be white because you don't understand possibly our most core trait that we evolved to contend with a more interesting climate.

Not everyone else out there is heartless and self centered, and it doesn't have to mean some complete lack of balance with preserving one's own. Cope with the circumstances.
 
Honestly, having read the bulldog breeding thread. I would highly suggest just reading the OP for the stream today. The social media posts are hilarious.

I can just imagine null hearing the ragged unnatural struggling breath of the bulldogs and just giggling and saying "I can't breath bark bark"
 
Last edited:
There is an indian company that finally heard of dump dinners and is trying to shill a product that to 'make it easier." All of their videos are extremely obviously staged. Tasty raw chicken anyone?

 
Last edited:
Perhaps you're thinking of Robert D. Putnam of Harvard University or possibly one of his peers or students.
That was him! This was the article I found so long ago that mentioned him and his book. Article was published August 2007.
Another seminal study was done by Dr. Andrew Leigh back in 2006 in a paper called Trust, Inequality and Ethnic Heterogeneity.
This one I hadn't heard of. I'll read it. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
A MitM attack was found that could subvert VPNs on public networks, using an obscure DHCP feature:

VPNs work by creating a virtual network interface that serves as an encrypted tunnel for communications. But researchers at Leviathan Security say they’ve discovered it’s possible to abuse an obscure feature built into the DHCP standard so that other users on the local network are forced to connect to a rogue DHCP server.

“Our technique is to run a DHCP server on the same network as a targeted VPN user and to also set our DHCP configuration to use itself as a gateway,” Leviathan researchers Lizzie Moratti and Dani Cronce wrote. “When the traffic hits our gateway, we use traffic forwarding rules on the DHCP server to pass traffic through to a legitimate gateway while we snoop on it.”

The feature being abused here is known as DHCP option 121, and it allows a DHCP server to set a route on the VPN user’s system that is more specific than those used by most VPNs. Abusing this option, Leviathan found, effectively gives an attacker on the local network the ability to set up routing rules that have a higher priority than the routes for the virtual network interface that the target’s VPN creates.

“Pushing a route also means that the network traffic will be sent over the same interface as the DHCP server instead of the virtual network interface,” the Leviathan researchers said. “This is intended functionality that isn’t clearly stated in the RFC [standard]. Therefore, for the routes we push, it is never encrypted by the VPN’s virtual interface but instead transmitted by the network interface that is talking to the DHCP server. As an attacker, we can select which IP addresses go over the tunnel and which addresses go over the network interface talking to our DHCP server.”

This doesn't seem to be a problem with VPNs, but with the DHCP standard itself:

Option 121 has been included in the DHCP standard since 2002, which means the attack described by Leviathan has technically been possible for the last 22 years.

To make it work an attacker would have to compromise the specific network you're on, which makes targeting users a bit more difficult. But if they were running a wide net operation, they could just compromise a popular node and capture all traffic to analyze later.

Solution? Run OSes or hardware that ignores the spec option

According to Leviathan, there are several ways to minimize the threat from rogue DHCP servers on an unsecured network. One is using a device powered by the Android operating system, which apparently ignores DHCP option 121. Relying on a temporary wireless hotspot controlled by a cellular device you own also effectively blocks this attack.

Android chads stay winning, Apple fags BTFO again.
 
Hey @Null can you play this entering the bossman segment
 
Back
Top Bottom