💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The reddit jannie looks like he has no face in the same way troons do. I really can't describe it better.
 
Why are all these Pajeets in congress so ugly looking? (link) I bet it would be easy for @Null to piss of this jeet and get a response
IMG_4831-compressed.jpeg IMG_4836.jpeg
Also the video the jeet posted isn’t even the same guy
IMG_4833-compressed.jpeg
 
Kino Casino in a nutshell:


Haramburger said:
School library:
View attachment 8467157 View attachment 8467158

TV reruns:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=6b2G8ySKNgAhttps://youtube.com/watch?v=2I7vPbthvWohttps://youtube.com/watch?v=L5ow__n__oQ
toys:
View attachment 8467170View attachment 8467171
View attachment 8467175
Click to expand...
The girl with the ribbon and the man with the tall teeth etched themselves into my brain from the moment I saw them. I remember listening along to the book with a cassette tape version using those big, ugly tan over-ear headphones.
 
It's All So Tiresome said:
One more that is near and dear to my heart.
nickisfag.mp4
Nicholas DeOrio is an insufferable fence sitter on all politics, a sweep it up jan jan faggot, a Keemstar dingleberry, a current Ethan Klein post-show, but most importantly he is a Destiny orbiter. He only "disavowed" Destiny after the most recent lawsuit when he couldn't deal with the pressure from his fortnite age fans. He also got into a gay fight with Dan Saltman who honestly felted him and he had to run away from the community after being embarassed by an adult. However, if anyone thinks a dipshit this fat could fall out of Destiny's orbit you are a fool. Tom is also a staunch Destiny orbiter.
Click to expand...
Seeing null go at augie and nicholas was pure kino. I genuinely detest all of these people and their gay little discord community. From what I remember nicholas deorio took a picture of one of his irl galpals once and tried to pass her off as his gf on xitter.
It's All So Tiresome said:
All these people suck off Destiny.
Click to expand...
There's a reason for this. Since the commentary community is made up entirely of autistic, drama-loving spergs who can't wait to rip into each other over some bullshit drama. You kinda need to attach yourself to a bigger youtuber in the sphere as protection. Y'know the greentext of that guy talking about how he survived prison simply by sucking off the biggest and meanest looking nigger he could find? And then the nigger would protect him in return? Well, the CC functions somewhat like this. You have to be an orbiter or else you will get no views and you WILL get raped by the community who see you as weak prey.

It's either Destiny, Hasan or Asmongold. Good luck carving out a name in the CC without doing some ass licking
 
It's All So Tiresome said:
Nicholas DeOrio is an insufferable fence sitter on all politics, a sweep it up jan jan faggot, a Keemstar dingleberry, a current Ethan Klein post-show, but most importantly he is a Destiny orbiter.
Click to expand...
To be fair, Nick Oreo doesn't stand for nothing, he is just in it for the money. I'm not defending him or attacking him, i'm just stating a fact - i think he even says as much. When all you do/say is driven by money then you're gonna be a fence sitter, you're only gonna take a stance once everyone has made up their minds and you're gonna side wth the majority etc.
 
might need to update your notice before ofcom tell you null
1769296882574.png
92: After Clause 27, insert the following new Clause—

“Action to prohibit the provision of VPN services to children in the United Kingdom(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed the Secretary of State must, for the purpose of furthering the protection and wellbeing of children, make regulations which prohibit the provision to UK children of a relevant VPN service (the “child VPN prohibition”).(2) Regulations under subsection (1)—(a) may make provision for the provider of a relevant VPN service to apply to any person seeking to access its service in or from the UK age assurance which is highly effective at correctly determining whether or not that person is a child;(b) must apply the child VPN prohibition to the provider of any relevant VPN service which is, or is likely to be—(i) offered or marketed to persons in the United Kingdom;(ii) provided to a significant number of persons;(c) must make provision for the monitoring and effective enforcement of the child VPN prohibition.(3) OFCOM may produce guidance for providers of relevant VPN services to assist them in complying with the child VPN prohibition.(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (1) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.(5) For the purposes of this section—“child” means a person under the age of 18;“consumer” means a person acting otherwise than in the course of a business;“relevant VPN service” means a service of providing, in the course of a business, to a consumer, a virtual private network for accessing the internet;“UK child” means any child who is in the United Kingdom.” Toggle showing location ofColumn 351Member's explanatory statement

This new clause would require the Secretary of State to take action to promote and protect children’s wellbeing, and to further support child protective measures in the Online Safety Act, by prohibiting the provision to children in the United Kingdom of VPN services which can facilitate evasion of OSA age-gating processes.
Click to expand...
...
My Amendment 92 seeks to raise the age of access to VPNs to 18, as it is clear that some children are using VPNs to get round age restrictions for gambling and pornography and might well use them for social media, so it is closely linked to Amendment 94A. On Amendment 93, I have had a constructive discussion with Ministers on this issue and more discussions are in progress, so I will not push that to a vote today. I urge noble Lords to vote for my Amendment 94A on social media and Amendment 92 on VPNs.
Click to expand...
Children may also turn to VPNs, which would then undermine the child safety gains of the Online Safety Act. The VPN amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Nash, tries to address this, but age-gating VPNs may be extremely problematic. My phone uses a VPN, following a personal device cyber consultation offered by this Parliament. VPNs can make us more secure, and we should not rush to deprive children of that safety. A blunt, blanket ban—it is a struggle not to call it a Blunkett ban—would also deny young people the positives of some of the less addictive social media.
Click to expand...
As for safety and whether this ban will throw children off a cliff edge, it risks not equipping youth with the skills to safely and responsibly navigate the online world, knowing how to identify problems, spot dodgy red flags and apply strategies to deal with them. As the noble Lord, Lord Mohammed of Tinsley, pointed out, in all likelihood, many pre-16 year-olds will find ways of migrating to even riskier unregulated platforms or the dark web without guardrails and zero moderation. Our teenagers and children are clever and, dare I say it, devious. They will find a way. They will use VPNs—but it is okay, because noble Lords are going to ban those too. I hear that there is already a roaring trade in fake IDs among pre-teens.

Finally, how will over 16 year-old adults be affected by this ban? Whereas the Online Safety Act age-gated only certain types of harmful content, Amendment 94A would age-gate entire platforms, even when the content is child-friendly or harmless. According to Big Brother Watch, a 70 year-old accessing the neighbourhood news, a 50 year-old looking up the history of golf on Wikipedia, a 30 year-old small business owner responding to customers on Instagram and a 17 year-old wanting to message parents on the way home from school would all require age-verification measures. That is the threat to adult civil liberties and the right to privacy and, in effect, it means that we will have to digitally verify to participate in the public square. I do not necessarily think that young people will gain from this, despite the hyperbole.
Click to expand...
 
So information related to Clayton Ray Huff's swatting got leaked, and it was blamed on fellow Lolcow Oddkast/BT/Nicholas John Stabile III while the Dream thread was cited.
Emperor Norton

🌟 Internet Famous Post in thread 'Clayton Ray Huff / Dream / DreamOnPvP / DreamTraps / DreamAF / DreamXD / DeltaKnight / DreamSkilful / Clayman23'

Some files relating to fat green man's repeated swattings here. Funniest thing here is how an official investigative report cited this thread and Nicholas Stabile as the sources of the phonebook and swatting in general

Screenshot 2026-01-24 173656.png
Reactions:Informative x 6 Lol x 2 Like x 1
 
After Josh's lashing out at chud yesterday I think he should be aware that chud has been spotted on holiday in the US saying some incredibly suspect stuff.
 
I risked my life going to Florida.
I never though I would encounter Josh.
Here is my totally honest video of Josh in the wild.
 

Attachments

  • A Real Cheesy Cartoon from the 70s ｜ I Hanker For a Hunk of Cheese - Time For Timer ｜ 1970s PSA.mp4
    7.4 MB
I found something that might be of interest.

A woman did a kick stream called dellywave where she walks on a treadmill with a green screen background playing POV footage of a guy walking through India while pretending to be the one walking through India herself.

It's entertaining and surreal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom