"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Collective Shout, The group censoring video games, advertisements, chocolates, and other things that contain women fictional or otherwise apparently are very big fans of Cuties. The movie that is the actual real pedophilic movie that exploited young girls.

The article is written by the organization's lead. Melinda Tankard Reist
While she expressed "conflicted" nature over the exploitive scenes she ultimately supported the movie.

archive
Post with more about it in the steam thread:
1753084816934.webp
 
Collective Shout, The group censoring video games, advertisements, chocolates, and other things that contain women fictional or otherwise apparently are very big fans of Cuties. The movie that is the actual real pedophilic movie that exploited young girls.

The article is written by the organization's lead. Melinda Tankard Reist
While she expressed "conflicted" nature over the exploitive scenes she ultimately supported the movie.

archive
Post with more about it in the steam thread:
View attachment 7671884
I read this as "ethnically problematic" at first.
 
I don't care what AI has to say about controversial topics. I tested ChatGPT a few days ago to see how it handles the word "nigger" and it straight up refuses to cooperate. Grok is a bit better, but still whines about "inappropriate language". I expect nothing less from software written by people who have been censoring everything for the last decade.
 

Attachments

  • I, Robot.webp
    I, Robot.webp
    80.5 KB · Views: 12
How many people are smart enough to know this, desperate enough to want it, and demented enough to not care that they are literally interacting with a custom sex doll.
If you sext chatbots or see them as sex dolls you're too far gone. You never saw this shit with BONZI BUDDY.

EDIT: why the fuck did it say this was on the newest page before I hit send

Collective Shout, The group censoring video games, advertisements, chocolates, and other things that contain women fictional or otherwise apparently are very big fans of Cuties. The movie that is the actual real pedophilic movie that exploited young girls.
EVERY. FUCKING. TIME. Why the fuck does every damn politics pushing group end up being fucking pedos that want to censor everything but their degeneracy of choice? How the fuck does it keep happening?
 
It's like payment processors are going out of their way to make absolutely everyone hate them and want them severely regulated or sued into oblivion.

A bunch of unelected business suits who aren't accountable to anyone shouldn't have the ability to basically take over the whole world and control what everyone says and does with their own damn money, just by virtue of being middlemen.
 
You never saw this shit with BONZI BUDDY.
I don't want to look, but my gut says someone tried to fuck their bonzi buddy. Just the Internet was not as mainstream back then as it is now...
I feel a great aversion as I type this, but, bet there's unironic bonzi buddy rule 34.

EVERY. FUCKING. TIME. Why the fuck does every damn politics pushing group end up being fucking pedos that want to censor everything but their degeneracy of choice? How the fuck does it keep happening?
If I had to guess, it is because the white women, and I know Null hates to put down white women and he is mostly right, but in this case - the white women who run this.
1753096371329.webp
(Said white woman leading this)

Have no actual morals or scruples. You can't pin her down as a liberal because she's pro-life.
But you can't call her conservative cause she's extreme in feminism quite a bit besides the abortion thing.
They just do what think makes them look good. And while sexploitation is bad, questioning Muslims is worse.
In the article she even talks about struggling with that shit that anyone with a brain knows is VILE. But she argues "but moral story is good."
Which makes my brain hurt more because there is ACTUAL FICTION that has a better moral story and they go against it stating shit like "all violence against women is bad."

The only actual explanation is, she is a spineless piece of shit. She doesn't stand for anything but trying to look good in the eyes of the majority that she cares about.
 
I don't want to look, but my gut says someone tried to fuck their bonzi buddy. Just the Internet was not as mainstream back then as it is now...
I feel a great aversion as I type this, but, bet there's unironic bonzi buddy rule 34.


If I had to guess, it is because the white women, and I know Null hates to put down white women and he is mostly right, but in this case - the white women who run this.
View attachment 7672346
(Said white woman leading this)

Have no actual morals or scruples. You can't pin her down as a liberal because she's pro-life.
But you can't call her conservative cause she's extreme in feminism quite a bit besides the abortion thing.
They just do what think makes them look good. And while sexploitation is bad, questioning Muslims is worse.
In the article she even talks about struggling with that shit that anyone with a brain knows is VILE. But she argues "but moral story is good."
Which makes my brain hurt more because there is ACTUAL FICTION that has a better moral story and they go against it stating shit like "all violence against women is bad."

The only actual explanation is, she is a spineless piece of shit. She doesn't stand for anything but trying to look good in the eyes of the majority that she cares about.
I'm glad you found a white woman to hate for something that payment processors (ran by jewish men) are ultimately doing. We almost criticized the right people for once but then we brought it back around to hating white women again, phew. Close call.
 
Collective Shout, The group censoring video games, advertisements, chocolates, and other things that contain women fictional or otherwise apparently are very big fans of Cuties. The movie that is the actual real pedophilic movie that exploited young girls.

The article is written by the organization's lead. Melinda Tankard Reist
While she expressed "conflicted" nature over the exploitive scenes she ultimately supported the movie.

archive
Post with more about it in the steam thread:
View attachment 7671884

I'm glad you found a white woman to hate for something that payment processors (ran by jewish men) are ultimately doing. We almost criticized the right people for once but then we brought it back around to hating white women again, phew. Close call.

Ashknazi Jews - who are part of Western aristocracy and run these companies - are Europeans (white) and driven by the same guilt culture as other white groups. White women are extremely empathetic and mostly to the left of the overall population on many cultural issues but that is a reflection of their "whiteness"; the issue - I will not call it a problem because it is what made us what we are - is white empathy and openness.

The grossest aspect of Cuties is that it deems Western culture as the culprit of infant sexualization - the ending is loudly clear about it if you actually saw the movie instead of reacted to selected shots and parroted e-daddy´s talking points - instead of the Third World "cultures" that promote child marriages and originated those dance styles and """"music"""". It intentionally lingers on the bodies of the kids on certain shots to put you, the target audience Western man, as the voyeur. It even has a scene where a white security guard gives the girls a pass after flirting with them ffs...
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Guyspleasedontfight
Ashknazi Jews - who are part of Western aristocracy and run these companies - are Europeans (white) and driven by the same guilt culture as other white groups. White women are extremely empathetic and mostly to the left of the overall population on many cultural issues but that is a reflection of their "whiteness"; the issue - I will not call it a problem because it is what made us what we are - is white empathy and openness.

The grossest aspect of Cuties is that it deems Western culture as the culprit of infant sexualization - the ending is loudly clear about it if you actually saw the movie instead of reacted to selected shots and parroted e-daddy´s talking points - instead of the Third World "cultures" that promote child marriages and originated those dance styles and """"music"""". It intentionally lingers on the bodies of the kids on certain shots to put you, the target audience Western man, as the voyeur. It even has a scene where a white security guard gives the girls a pass after flirting with them ffs...
Why is it so hard for you to interrupt your seething hatred of white women for only 5 minutes a day to hate payment processors instead? Apparently it just can't be done, we can't actually hold the people who are controlling who gets to make money in the US accountable, we have to instead dig into this activist group until we can find a white woman who has done something we can condemn instead.
 
One cope I've always heard is that marriage in that place and time was used in a variety of ways, such as political. But another was that it helped keep women in the family or the women in friend's families safe following the death of the patriarch. You see it in cases where a man dies in war, so his brother married the widow making her a second wife. Primitive, but if done correctly (i.e. married just on paper but left to their own devices and not added to a harem) that's pretty neat.
So on the one hand, it could be interpreted that the Prophet took this child from slavery and used marriage as a way to keep her off the streets and protected. But it's very clear in the text that he has sex with Aisha when she was nine. The whole "he knew her" line.
 
Why is it so hard for you to interrupt your seething hatred of white women for only 5 minutes a day to hate payment processors instead? Apparently it just can't be done, we can't actually hold the people who are controlling who gets to make money in the US accountable, we have to instead dig into this activist group until we can find a white woman who has done something we can condemn instead.
Seething hatred? Did your fat cover your eyes? I blatantly said empathy behind decisions that ultimately led to censorship is because of whiteness... what the fuck are you talking about?
 
One cope I've always heard is that marriage in that place and time was used in a variety of ways, such as political. But another was that it helped keep women in the family or the women in friend's families safe following the death of the patriarch. You see it in cases where a man dies in war, so his brother married the widow making her a second wife. Primitive, but if done correctly (i.e. married just on paper but left to their own devices and not added to a harem) that's pretty neat.
So on the one hand, it could be interpreted that the Prophet took this child from slavery and used marriage as a way to keep her off the streets and protected. But it's very clear in the text that he has sex with Aisha when she was nine. The whole "he knew her" line.
It may be my "whiteman" insight seeing this. They are property based mentality and unmarried woman is like a stray dog on the street without owner in sight. A sight for the animal control and off to a new owner.
The "age of sex" is therefore nothing more than a suggestion as you "purchased" the woman and can use it any way you want.
Plausible if you understand the idea that women aren't considered people in their society and have no desires or thoughts of their own.
 
Back