💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Everyone in the circle he's in and (the sektur )has had some sort of public relationship or child or relationship drama but null has done everything he could to keep any relationships or non internet friends as far away from eyes as possible.

This is extremely confusing and weird to everyone else In it who are completely comfortable and even expected to turn these relationships into "content".

So they assume he isn't capable of having these relationships.
 
God's strongest milkman said:
Everyone in the circle he's in and (the sektur )has had some sort of public relationship or child or relationship drama but null has done everything he could to keep any relationships or non internet friends as far away from eyes as possible.

This is extremely confusing and weird to everyone else In it who are completely comfortable and even expected to turn these relationships into "content".

So they assume he isn't capable of having these relationships.
Click to expand...
In fairness alot of those people can't even do basic math.
 
@Null Some lul material for friday.

For the record, please confirm or deny the claim, did Nick successfully transmit his ED to you via brainwave?

1747158382032.webp
[Archive/Archive]

Posted first here: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/nichol...ally-criminal-nickrekieta.53871/post-21415233
 
I should probably not say anything... but whatever.

The brony is a rapist, but the girl also has 0 survival instincts. Penetrate and handshake me once, shame on you, penetrate and handshake me twice shame on me WHY OH WHY DID YOU FUCKING GO WITH HIM AGAIN?! That the guys is 100% scum doesn't suddenly mean that the girl has 0 agency.

As for asking consent in a normal situation. This is where the heavy autism in this place may be a problem. But there is a thing called "mood" and most social savvy people are capable of knowing if the "mood" is right and do not need to verbalize "hello madam, may we partake in the hankypanky?". This social savvyness also extends to noticing if you missread the mood and stopping instantly. There is a courtship to this and not instantly ramming your cock into a woman, there are multiple signals that both sides give each other during said courtship.
 
ShitLurker said:
Is there a TL;DR? I have a hard time going through pigmonster's valley girl routine. That or at least when he stops harping on the sane 4 things he always bellows about Jersh.

Well, I'll give it this, it does feel a bit like ol internet bloodsports.
Click to expand...
TLDR: cope & sneed from ralph while null speaks of the record.
 
@Null I'd like to hear your take on the recent shake-up in the Copyright Office as well as the USCO's "shadow ruling" on AI fair use prior to any judges having made any rulings one way or the other. In the past you've talked about how important fair use is to the forum so I thought you might have some insight. Maybe Hardin could provide some insight too, if he's not too busy.

Runch

Post in thread 'AI Art Seething General'

Warning: long sperg essay ahead. I feel like matters of copyright and fair use affect KF rather deeply and wanted to give this issue the attention it deserves.

The US Copyright Office has waded into the AI/fair use legal battle and ignited some controversy in the process. Their latest conclusions could have far-reaching impact on AI development, and more broadly how fair use is interpreted.

The USCO has been gradually developing a series of reports on the subject of AI and how they are planning to treat it moving forward. They've released three of them:

Part 1 - Where they stress the...
Reactions:Informative x 25 Winner x 4 Agree x 1 Dumb x 1 Horrifying x 1

Essentially, the Copyright Office has declared AI training to not be fair use in a new "pre-publication" report, which was pushed out only hours before the Librarian of Congress and the head of the Copyright Office were both fired.

In their report, the Copyright Office is so eager to rule in favor of AI plaintiffs that they accidentally(?) end up gutting some of the principles of fair use. What got my attention in particular is how they declare out of nowhere that AI training "uses" 100% of each image it trains on, so therefore it clearly fails fair use factor 3, citing statements made by the plaintiffs in ongoing litigation which no judge has yet said is a correct assessment. AI is a complex topic and can be hard to wrap your head around, but suffice to say, models aren't zip files and they don't store the works they train on. If "examining" something in full and producing a few bytes of derivative data counts as using 100% of it and therefore not fair use, then that would apply to every summary everyone writes of a movie, book, video game or pillstream. It would also apply to anyone using even a small part of a work, since they would've had to examine the entire work to find the part they wanted to use.

You could say well, you have to possess the work in full to be able to examine it and derive data from it, but the question of whether that possession is legal is a separate one from whether or not the work is 100% present in the finished product.

I know the USCO doesn't get to write laws, but their views could go on to influence judges and lawyers, or perhaps end up cited in a judge's decision. But I'm no lawyer, so I'm not sure how much of a concern this is.

Might even be something for the Internet Preservation Society to comment on.
 
Last edited:
Runch said:
I'd like to hear your take on the recent shake-up in the Copyright Office as well as the USCO's "shadow ruling" on AI fair use prior to any judges having made any rulings one way or the other. In the past you've talked about how important fair use is to the forum so I thought you might have some insight. Maybe Hardin could provide some insight too, if he's not too busy.
Click to expand...
1747170333639.webp

can't wait also but,
.....
forgot to add the extra sause
1747170453278.webp
“...no State or political subdivision thereof may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems during the 10 year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act,” says the text of the bill introduced Sunday night by Congressman Brett Guthrie of Kentucky, Chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The text of the bill will be considered by the House at the budget reconciliation markup on May 13.
Click to expand...
 
Pizza Time said:
Additionally, from a female perspective, it's hard to outright say "no" or putting up resistance in a situation like that when you're with a guy that you really like. Beyond just the matter of "if I give him what he wants, he'll reward me with a relationship," there's the concern of being seen as a boring prude and then losing the attention he's giving you. On top of that, there's always the small chance that he could react poorly - you never really know, so it's safer to just go along with it sometimes.
Click to expand...
Thats a shitty thing for a guy do do but you have to agree that its not rape.
And even if consent is explicitly asked and given that doesnt change anything in this situation.
 
Slur Generator said:
Thats a shitty thing for a guy do do but you have to agree that its not rape.
And even if consent is explicitly asked and given that doesnt change anything in this situation.
Click to expand...
It's a very muddy and grey situation, because it could be considered technically rape or coercion from the woman's perspective but not from the man's perspective. It's certainly not the type of situation where criminal prosecution could occur, but it's enough to cancel someone. That's why you usually see scenarios like that happen with Internet famous people. The situation with Dondrrr from Supermega is one of those types of situations where from Don's perspective there was nothing wrong, but from Lex's perspective she felt like she was taken advantage of. There's no objective reality in situations like that because each party has a different and real perspective. It's just shitty all around.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom