- Joined
- Dec 7, 2020
You could be totally right. I don't know. So far I put a the site being weird down to the updates. I don't know if it's a feature that when someone is banned they don't show up in search and in @-auto complete. I could be wrong for giving the benefit of the doubt.I think he's right about the temp ban; go to the search box in the upper right corner and type l-i-d- -- there should be options that include @Lidl Drip --- just now the system wouldn't let me tag her. @Forsaken Wanderer is also untaggable [meaning they won't pop up while creating this post].
experimental edit to see if every edit creates a new post bc so far that is what I'm seeing.
I left a profile post on Lidl Drip's profile and it has not been deleted. All I asked is if she was banned or temporarily banned. If she was banned temporarily, then I would suspect that the name would not be red and crossed out. I'm guessing that is automatically done by the forum and is not manually added after the banning takes place. I would expect that my post would be deleted for the same reason "in fighting bullshit", because inquiring about a ban would be covered under the same reason for being banned. I could be wrong about this, but that's what I'd guess.
I did a search for posts from Lidl Drip. Again, I don't expect the name to come up in the suggestion and I don't read-in to that meaning anything. But, of course that's up for debate. Lidl Drip's last post was 5:16 PM UTC+0. She was posting about not wanting men to talk to her last. I think Null is on the US East cost now, so that means between Drip's last post on the 16th (Wednesday) and noon on the 18th (MATI) this would have all went down, and in that time span Null would have been contacted by someone saying that they were dissatisfied with some of the new changes, per the video you archived, if that was the reason Lidl Drip got banned and some posts were deleted. It's of course also possible that the banning and comments mentioned on MATI are unrelated.
It's wroth keep looking into.


