💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
An automatic clown said:
I'll never forget walking into the bathroom at work (typical multi stall, couple urinals, few sinks) and seeing ALL of some guys clothes folded neatly on the dirty bathroom floor while he shat. Then I realized we are among animals (he was black, engineer too)
Click to expand...
My friend has a professor that would pee at urinals with his pants and underwear to the floor
 
Null said:
I feel like literally nothing has happened since Tuesday. Maybe I should just play stake.us for two hours to commiserate.
Click to expand...
Cmon now, it's Ethan Ralph's birthday today! He has inexplicably lived to age 39.

raphbirthday.PNG

When checking to make sure that was correct, I also found this very accurate information:

ralphrichbish.PNG
 
MerelyAPlateOfSpaghetti said:
Claim one - "suspicious" remote logins contain no remote workstation name. Microsoft documentation states that's expected as that workstation name is not a required field. If they were logging into the server using a remote support application of some sort, it could proxy through the remote support servers and possibly not provide a workstation name. Very plausible, honestly.

Claim two - "suspicious" remote logins somehow didn't generate a credential validation event. This part comes off a lot more as "trust us, we looked" since they say they checked and every remote login had a corresponding credential validation event logged. They just say it always generates the paired events and they've never found a case where it didn't. It's unclear if they mean in general, or on that particular election log dump. But expert testimony really is just "trust me I'm an expert" in the end.
Click to expand...
Thank you.
The reason I asked wanted Josh to watch it is I was hoping he would know about 4624 logs.
When I first watched the video (for multiple paper types, at 1:21:40 rebuttal was "we only authorized votesecure™ paper"...), this part caught my attention because the witness had a clear increase in vocal stress: more stuttering, higher pitch. I thought there would be some smoking gun, obvious to an expert, like, "workstation name isn't a required field, but every computer on the whitelist for the server to count the votes should (does) provide a workstation name, so this is a smoking gun." but I guess Josh didn't think so.
@Null here's my idea for a women's shirt, it's ham, femham, and kiwi trick-or-treating.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240920_092501552.jpg
    IMG_20240920_092501552.jpg
    1.8 MB · Views: 36
@Null, I will stop highlighting you with Bossman related shit after this for now, but if you are going to talk about the status of Austins felony and you've seen this post, please disregard it as the poster is retarded and didn't even read the article he quotes to proof Austin doesn't have a felony on his record:

Please use this one by @lol cow supreme which summarizes his current status as a felon properly, if you wanted to talk about it: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/austin...7-bossmanjack-irondollah.170347/post-19385078

Don't want any FAKE BOSSMAN NEWS on my MATI :feels:
 
Sugriva said:
I will not allow the sacred lolcow of the year award to be compromised by mail in vote fraud. STOP THE COUNT.
Click to expand...
3am Bossman ballot drop incoming!
Null said:
I feel like literally nothing has happened since Tuesday. Maybe I should just play stake.us for two hours to commiserate.
Click to expand...
Only if you spice the stream up with some crackarooski.
 
redbeardeded said:
this part caught my attention because the witness had a clear increase in vocal stress: more stuttering, higher pitch
Click to expand...
Not to say one way or another, but that section of the testimony was a lot more technical than discussing authorized paper, and he knows he has to accurately describe the technical details without being TOO technical, so I can understand that being more stressful in general. Reminds me of customers who want an explanation of something that happened, but they actually really don't care about the technical details - so they can be both pushy and overwhelmed by the information they asked for. Say something a little too technical and they lose the thread entirely and derail. And that's not even in a "defend your company from allegations" kind of situation!
 
Null said:
I feel like literally nothing has happened since Tuesday. Maybe I should just play stake.us for two hours to commiserate.
Click to expand...
Nigga youre in Serbia, you can actually gamble on the .com where there's more games
 
Late but finally had time to sit down and finish the last episode. It was nice to hear Josh be in high spirits throughout the thing for a change! Sure brightened my day.

Bit off-topic, but this seems like it'd be fitting for a quick chuckle, timestamped for your convenience. Always amazes me how the things people giggled at as silly jokes in the nineties are praised today as beautiful and brave. What I wouldn't give for a time machine some days.
 
This one goes out to all the vooters in chat. This is the Hamilton cast. Josh, play this next time you do a poll and see if you get less involvement
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom