Looksmaxers - Looking good, at any cost. The other side of the troonism coin. Big Pharma's guinea pigs.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
DSP for president 2032 said:
I initially thought "no bond, that means they know he's getting a mandatory minimum and want to start the clock." Is this how courts think, or am I way off? Does granting bond mean he might be getting off with probation? Am I a moron for asking these questions in the himbo thread? Please respond.
Click to expand...
I'm not an expert on the U.S's legal system but I'm guessing the first part is in reference to time served. Time served does count towards a mandatory minimum but courts don't usually keep someone without bond in order to count towards time served. The "held without bond" is for criminals who committed terrible crimes (one would think this is one) and you don't want to endager the public by letting them out. That or they present a flight risk. However a judge must be able to articulate with great reasoning a reason to not allow bail as grsnting bail is more often than not the rule not the exception.

As for the second half, having or not having bond doesn't equate or ellude to future sentencing. Having bond doesn't make it any more or less likely that the sentence is parole. Plenty of people have been granted bond, spent time preparing for a trial and then ended up with life in prison. Many courts are fine with bail because the state gets paid and the jail is unburdened by one less pre-trial convict they have to take care of. Mind you no matter how damning the evidence, until he is put on trial and convicted or pleads guilty he is "innocent" and the state must treat him as such to a "reasonable" extent lest they cause any number of problems that could damage the state's case. Worth noting that time on bail does not count towards time served. In an ideal society he would have been Judge Dredd'd in his living room.
 
No. 7 cat said:
hullostan.mp4
original link

A TikToker Neo.Coom is an example of a looksmaxxer fan stanning for Hullo. His content used to be good, but now the question is what's on his devices. It might be a bit more than Hullo's abortive 25 Venmo coom. Comments suggest he's in his 30s and his loooong bangs might be hiding a receding hairline. He dances too well. His main output when not dancing is NEET propaganda.
Click to expand...
honestly,kinda not liking neocoom
 
God... it always has to be heinous MAXXED.. everytime.

I was hoping it was just a bunch of buttholes or something. But no.. its horrible torture rape shit again.

Then I was horrified that they have pushed so far I was hoping it was just "light csam" as though there even was such a thing.

Throw him under the jail

Cancel the internet. Cancel phones.
 
Now getting accused of a crime against a child, in FUCKING FLORIDA, of all places, is NOT a good place to be in. And knowing how the legal system is in the states, it would probably take months to convict him of anything.

He better pray he makes bail, else it's going to be a long hard time before he even sees a courtroom.
 
Duke Nukem said:
Now getting accused of a crime against a child, in FUCKING FLORIDA, of all places, is NOT a good place to be in. And knowing how the legal system is in the states, it would probably take months to convict him of anything.

He better pray he makes bail, else it's going to be a long hard time before he even sees a courtroom.
Click to expand...
He unfortunately already got bailed out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom