To be honest, it was only going to go downhill from the moment that clip about "Demons just say words to trick you without even understanding them" got boosted IMO. Mainly because it's just a simple saying repackaged as some new idea:
Words can only take someone so far, actions are final.
They're also mentioned as descendants of mimics which corresponds to fellow whites, and linguistics to confuse and undermine humanity.
At the same time, they ultimately take aggressive actions into their own hands rather than following through with pitting people against each other, and prioritise personal strength as the basis of their hierarchy, which undermines the sly and conniving aspect. It's a bit of a narrative mess if they're not an amalgam of evil. And that's not getting started on the convergent evolution bit.
It may as well be 1000 years in the future and all non-humans are artificial lab experiments like Underwater Ray Romano.
Back on this topic, i found this earlier today.
So alongside the sexualizing kids problem TF2 also has a pretty big showing porn to kids problem.
Also the game has a very serious bully problem as well. Know where i can go to discuss that?
Holy freudian slip. Is he sure THAT'S the hill is willing to die on? Notice he didn't say "random children".
Sentences like this just make him appear more like a pedophile. How is it weird that people own normal photos of children? Every adult was a child once or has child relatives Siri. It's not weird to own normal ass photos of your childhood, your children, your relatives or group photos were children just happen to be a part of.
Gtri said the same thing and Siri immediately changed it to random kids and still maintained that having photos of children is creepy and weird. This is the original photo posted:
The child here is fully covered with only her hands and face visible. Her face is also blurred. There's no way to demonstrate this point without using a real child because otherwise they will call the child fictional with 0 relation to real children.
Gtri recognizes what Siri is doing and tries to escape, but it's too late. Siri makes the bold argument that using pictures of real children as references in relation to 18+ topics is worse than jerking off to anime toddlers. Gtri calls this gaslighting (Gtri is right) and points out that children are always going to be involved with discussing topics adjacent to pedophilia, pointing out that searching "pedophile" on Google brings up pictures of real children.
Siri then claims that sending pictures of children to people you think are pedophiles is "crazy", another bold claim. It's also an exaggeration of Gtri's position, as Gtri believes not all lolicons are pedophiles, but some are.
This xeet is from another thread, but Siri responded to this xeet at the exact same time as the other one, so he knew Gtri's position.
These lolicons and lolicon defenders are employing what I will call the "clownfish defense". They can hide in their anemone of degeneracy where fictional art of elementary schoolers being raped is condoned. As soon as an "anti" approaches, they're already trapped in the same degeneracy, but do not have the same defenses as the lolicons.
The lolicons can argue that the art is just fictional and says nothing about them. The "anti" cannot say the same, as they believe the degeneracy is vile and perverse. Even posting screenshots of the alleged materials means the anti "viewed CP" (from the anti's point of view) making the anti at least pedophile-adjacent, and any comparisons of the fictional NSFW content to real children means the anti is trying to associate NSFW content with real children.
The clownfish remains safe while the anti dies to the anemone's stinging tentacles.
A few xeets were defending Gtri, but none of them summarize the situation as concisely as this one:
It's no wonder few people on these platforms voice their objections with lolicons. Even if they are lolicons themselves but think "their side" has gone too far, they won't say anything. Nobody wants to be gaslit, ratioed, and called a pedophile at the same time.
Lolicons could argue that they were subjected to the same treatment before by broader society, and were called pedophiles unjustifiably. It would be ironic that certain lolicons use the same tactics, were it not entirely purposeful as they know the power of the accusation and want to use it for themselves. I like sharing funny things too. Gay Nick Fuentes says he jerks it to loli but Siri is RETARDED.
Ok so I saw something and maybe I'm late with this post but I tried finding the article (No pinned link so shrugaroo) and I'm super rushed today so figured someone might be able to source and check if the suspicions from the comments are right, visa vi, that he got banned for uploading lolicon to his g-drive.
I will note the fucking defence force were in full swing on a guy who went "Another person whinging for being banned for uploading drawn CP" and I legit saw someone say "WHY WERE THEY CHECKING HIS PRIVATE FILES THATS WRONG", the first guy goes "It's against their TOS to have this shit on your drive and it was AI checks which then made humans check" and the 2nd nigger goes
"ERM, WELL, ACKTUALLY ITS AGAINST TOS TO SHARE IT, NOT JUST UPLOAD IT"
I had to stop reading this filth.
Seriously, seeing that many people on Siri's side and falsely accusing someone like that is making me feel sick and disgusted, especially with the filth they're into.
This is seriously making my cry, why is this world so full of injustice? Why can't God end it all already and bring the good people to His Kingdom as He destroys this Earth?
Ok so I saw something and maybe I'm late with this post but I tried finding the article (No pinned link so shrugaroo) and I'm super rushed today so figured someone might be able to source and check if the suspicions from the comments are right, visa vi, that he got banned for uploading lolicon to his g-drive.
I will note the fucking defence force were in full swing on a guy who went "Another person whinging for being banned for uploading drawn CP" and I legit saw someone say "WHY WERE THEY CHECKING HIS PRIVATE FILES THATS WRONG", the first guy goes "It's against their TOS to have this shit on your drive and it was AI checks which then made humans check" and the 2nd nigger goes
"ERM, WELL, ACKTUALLY ITS AGAINST TOS TO SHARE IT, NOT JUST UPLOAD IT"
All of the articles, tweets, and discussion related to this are pure repetition of the same idea, but they never source it. I used my ultimate super secret Kiwi Farms branded (upper-case I)nternet bullying and harassment powers to do what Chibi and all of the other lolicons couldn't: a 60 second google search. The original xitter post (archive) is in Japanese and comes from user @masahiroitosugi (archive). The first thing I see upon opening this person's profile and scrolling down is loli and other nip porn drawings.
By the way, I have to admit this embarrassment: I was banned from Google. When uploading data from a manga I drew long ago to the drive, a warning was issued, and my request for reexamination was rejected, resulting in a successful account ban. Seriously, this is a problem. I used Google accounts for various sites and services. It might not apply to all good kids, but if you think, "I'm a good kid..." Maybe? If you're thinking that, be careful!
By the way, I’m going to swallow my pride and admit this: I got my Google account banned. I got a warning while uploading data for a manga I drew a long time ago to Google Drive, my appeal was rejected, and sure enough, my account got banned.
Seriously, this is a real pain. I was using my Google account for all sorts of websites and services.
This might not affect all you good kids out there, but if you’re wondering, “Am I a good kid…?”—you better watch out!
The unnecessary usage of the word "kid" unnerves me, but it could be a mistranslation. Going to do some more looking into who this individual is, but I already have a theory: Google's moderation (most likely AI or a similar non-human system) saw the loli shit this person was uploading and gave the account firm kick in the ass.
(from my experience) It's not unusual to use 子 in place of a generic person in casual slang and the 良い子 (good kid) thing is kind of similar. He could be using it because he's a lolicon weirdo but relatively normal people do also say it. This is just my observations on Japanese in casual/online and entertainment idol settings though. I think it's meant to be cute or tongue in cheek but it does come across much weirder in the context of this thread.
(from my experience) It's not unusual to use 子 in place of a generic person in casual slang and the 良い子 (good kid) thing is kind of similar. He could be using it because he's a lolicon weirdo but relatively normal people do also say it. This is just my observations on Japanese in casual/online and entertainment idol settings though. I think it's meant to be cute or tongue in cheek but it does come across much weirder in the context of this thread.
Appreciate the clarification. I assume the worst with lolicons because I hate them and a good portion of what they say is a coded reference (example: the angry vein thing, the crying emoji, cute and funny, calling kids brats, the correction thing, etc).
The unnecessary usage of the word "kid" unnerves me, but it could be a mistranslation. Going to do some more looking into who this individual is, but I already have a theory: Google's moderation (most likely AI or a similar non-human system) saw the loli shit this person was uploading and gave the account firm kick in the ass.
"By the way, I’m going to swallow my pride and admit this: I got my Google account banned. I got a warning while uploading data for a manga I drew a long time ago to Google Drive, my appeal was rejected, and sure enough, my account got banned.
Seriously, this is a real pain. I was using my Google account for all sorts of websites and services.
This might not affect all you good kids out there, but if you’re wondering, “Am I a good kid…?”—you better watch out!
<filthy drawings cut>
The unnecessary usage of the word "kid" unnerves me, but it could be a mistranslation. Going to do some more looking into who this individual is, but I already have a theory: Google's moderation (most likely AI or a similar non-human system) saw the loli shit this person was uploading and gave the account <a> firm kick in the ass.
I agree with you, although I tend to think he's not telling the full story here.
From what relatives and acquaintances of mine have experienced I know that Google issues 2 different kinds of ban:
1. Service-limited (eg. Drive, YouTube, Gmail, etc.) These are issued for rather trivial reasons and you can still access any other Google services without problems, and even quickly open a replacement for the one you lost. (This happened to colleagues who uploaded their pirated music stash to Google Drive, as well as a slag who lived near me that tried doing porn on Youtube)
2. Companywide: (All Alphabet.Inc. services of user terminated). This happens in more serious cases. The user gets a warning notice, then access to all Google services except the search engine and basic phone app store is terminated. Person will be locked out of at least the service that the ban originated from. (Boomer relative of mine, bought a "cheap" secondhand phone, didn't bother resetting it and just logged into everything. This ended up being infected with malware that used her Gmail address to spam from. Reason given for ban in "warning" was "sending unsolicited mass mailings" and some story which amounted to "hacking". All Google Service accounts lost.)
I doubt that this Jap simply uploaded some "art" that he forgot he sold the rights of to a publisher, as this usually wouldn't even have cost him his account, the "work" would just been temporarily removed and he'd be forwarded a DMCA claim by email. (For some reason - probably the RIAA and its shit - they're much stricter on music when it comes to this, especially if there's a lot of it)
It's more likely (IMO) that he also included some totally repulsive material which, no matter how "inspiring" the "artist" might have found it, matched something in the NCMEC database. This would earn him the latter kind of ban and lock him out of Google Drive permanently.
US law enforcement generally forwards foreign potential child pornography cases to the local authority in charge, but given that this guy is in Japan I wouldn't hold my breath.
Note: Almost every SAAS service provider (Even Discord) whose service can potentially be used as a CDN scans all uploaded material for hashing and comparison to the NCMEC hash database. No company wants to be known as a safe haven for child pornography.
what I hate about discord is how you can't archive it properly without some autistically good scraping tools. Alot of the degeneracy hides in there and we can't reliably get it all saved.
Absolutely! It's always reasonable to assume that lolicons are being dishonest, either through direct lying or omission. My assumption initial assumption was that he uploaded something truly vile like we saw Mimi Yanagi/Jordan Williams had. Very well could have also been that he uploaded actual CSAM, as you said. One thing is for sure, all of the lolicons are out in full force to sweep this whole situation up. Even Chibi joined in.
Hey Twitter user Kanimilk via Nitter, is this in reference to something? View attachment 9045038 [A]
If you want to chat Busou Renkin, there has to be an easier format.
