Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
IMG_0381.jpeg
1778688066660.png
I mean how can anyone denying that the questionablestuff is very likely the authors fetish? Just look how it's drawn

Those people only cry why people don't see the genuis of their favourite lolicon/shotacon author and that those naked scenes of children/ panty shots are 100% relevant to the plot. But in the end the never ask themself why certain western authors can get away with disturbing books/movies without being called a pedophile. Just look at a calssic german speaking people are forced to read and watch the film adaption from.
1778688524411.png
The book contains teenage drug abuse, child prostitution, and child abuse. But why is this book not considered “pedobait”? (Christiane F. is a real person and the book is based on interviews she gave) The book was intended to force the general public to confront a societal problem that many people prefer to deny exists.
 
Does Coffin sexualize minors?
The main characters are in their early 20s (as Atticus said) but the community does a lot of pedo shit. I know there are scenes that show the main characters in their younger years, but I don't know if there's any sexualization there because I refuse to play filth like that game. I have seen all of it (pedophilia, incest, and cannibalism) being defended exactly how I referenced it: "dark themes" or "dark topics".
A lot of people will go above and beyond to defend horrible shit in media as long as it is something that they like. They will say it's "deep and meaningful" or needed to convey the message when the implication of said things happening is probably a lot more horrifying than showing the act, yet these people are unable to understand something like this. At this point i think that people that show graphic content like this so explicitly either have a fetish for it or they want to get popular or shock value.

I really despise the use of sexual imagery in order to disturb people. It's the lowest hanging fruit there is
I agree. Direct depiction of things like rape, incest, pedophilia, etc are oftentimes solely for shock value. There are exceptions, but those exceptions are rare. Even still, those effective depictions are not slamming it in your face as degenerates do. It's the "you know it when you see it" type of thing. If the focus is on the evil actions themselves, it's shock value shit. If the focus is on the impact, the result of the evil/degeneracy on the greater narrative and the characters, it is contributing. I guess the big question is really "Is it necessary to directly show this?".
 
It amazes me how those infantile those people are.
Despite it being called "Children's Day" and being created to celebrate real children, that certainly won't stop Hideo from gooning and posting a meme about "Miners".
I think we need to address: their best, and only defense is ignoring logic entirely. Explicitly in cases like this. Could they at least come up with "totally not real, totally legal, but totally child-like anime creatures of ambiguous age, despite body structure saying otherwise day".
 
I have seen all of it (pedophilia, incest, and cannibalism) being defended exactly how I referenced it: "dark themes" or "dark topics".
If the focus is on the impact, the result of the evil/degeneracy on the greater narrative and the characters, it is contributing. I guess the big question is really "Is it necessary to directly show this?".
At least it is necessary to Coffin's narrative and is portrayed as a very unhealthy thing. Made in Abyss portrays child abuse as bad but does it portray the sexualization as bad? Academics, please respond!

I think we need to address: their best, and only defense is ignoring logic entirely. Explicitly in cases like this. Could they at least come up with "totally not real, totally legal, but totally child-like anime creatures of ambiguous age, despite body structure saying otherwise day".
If they could stop associating their fetish with real kid stuff that would be great.

Evergreen tweet from the liveleak guy.
Link | Archive
22.png
Not saying liveleak is good but these people don't realize that most people aren't jerking off to child torture. If there was a child torture fetish manga it's justified to create a fan censored version.

Censorship is cringe. Unless it's gatekeeping then it's based.
Link | Archive
23.png
 
The main characters are in their early 20s (as Atticus said) but the community does a lot of pedo shit. I know there are scenes that show the main characters in their younger years, but I don't know if there's any sexualization there because I refuse to play filth like that game. I have seen all of it (pedophilia, incest, and cannibalism) being defended exactly how I referenced it: "dark themes" or "dark topics".
They pretty much escalated with the incest stuff and doubled down after nemlei was doxed. They will defend things under the umbrella of “dark themes”, but can’t understand why something like killing the parents and dismembering them or incest might be off putting for normal people. A lot of them come off as spergy porn addicts as it is, but they have so much difficulty with understanding why someone might not find that game entertaining.
 
Yet on another post coverage about the pedophile whore egirl vtumor slut:

1778715761271.png

Couldn't find any identifying info on her yet. rather than her self-face phonebook.

Still better to also archive this since i been using a burner Xeet acc to see who she follows and for surprise of no one jacob pedoreviews

What I find obvious is that, since Jacob is a defender of pedo-loli content, it naturally follows that someone who likes shotacon would eventually support anything adjacent to it.

Let that sink in for anyone of their cult: If you follow jacob, then by default you support lolicon, shotacon and anything in the middle to be a straight A+ Pedophile.
 
permanently threadbanned
I noticed an uptick in the number of artists being suspended on Xitter. My baseless accusation: Is it you KF niggers who keep mass reporting them or is it the soyteens? KF never learned from the Cogent-vs-KF incident or the Mastercard & Visa stuff and keep pushing for more retarded censorship after all
 
I noticed an uptick in the number of artists being suspended on Xitter. My baseless accusation: Is it you KF niggers who keep mass reporting them or is it the soyteens? KF never learned from the Cogent-vs-KF incident or the Mastercard & Visa stuff and keep pushing for more retarded censorship after all
Sad to see how mindraped you are by lolicoomers but Ill answer your baseless accusation. Kf doesnt want things taken down cause we want everything archived. see every single thread on this or any other page. If we see something as illegal we will go through the proper channels. Id say it may be soyteens cause they literally have a /raid/ board BUT that usually is for spamming and not for mass flagging. I would say it most likely in that matter is simply other twitter users responding to Jacob trying to silence people talking about his flagging group chat. you can say its untrue all you want, we have the screenshots and the messages to prove it. After all, archiving is what we do. Are you going to take anything I say in good faith? Likely not but I figure I would lay this out for the sake of making things clear.
 
"gaming larpers". It's so funny that normal people don't complain about the shit and go "Oh I guess the game isn't made for me" and play another game.
That's the problem of the terminal online people, they completly lost the plot. People that are actual spend their time gaming don't have the energy to complain about "Muh activists ruining gaming!", because the actual play games that they like.
 
Taken from the "AI Girlfriend/Boyfriend" thread; Chub AI recently announced a ban on all underage content.


The subreddit is crashing out hard.
 
Back
Top Bottom