Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

[neger psykolog]

They'll never ban my subreddit that sexualizes reddit mods

 

[I'mma real anime gurl]

This is the first time I've heard about Pragmata.

 

[moocow]

It is surprising Reddit of all places was the ones to do anything about it.

I'm sincerely shocked Reddit took action. That subreddit must have been posting borderline-hardcore lolicon of the character to prompt that kind of ban. Reddit's generally pretty tolerant of sexual content of even "questionable" legality so long as it's not, well, literally characters like this.

 

[Diddledones]

Which is very ironic given how much those types love to preach about "gatekeeping the tourists out."

What even is gatekeeping to them they always go on about “we need to gatekeep the tourist hoodweebs” what does it mean?

 

[Outer Space Traveller]

The release (and likely mainstream success) of Pragmata, showing to a mainstream audience and mainstream news sites that loliniggers openly lust for photorealistic children might just be the casus belli that marks the beginning of the end for the "lolicons are not pedophiles, they only like cartoons" cope.

Here's hoping. Yet people are too sedated to care.

It's genuinely terrifying that you can't release a video game with a child in it without pedophiles coming out of the woodwork to masturbate to her.

COVID really did a job on people's heads.

 

[2ndBest]

Its essentially a third person shooter with hacking mechanics spersed in. Think of Devil May Cry and how it has the style switching between combos.

The game I think will do well but will go the way of Mega Man ie never a fucking sequel for what feels like eternity. I played the demo and its fun. All pedos and lolicons deserved to be subjected to 24/7 annoying laughter then get thrown into woodchippers.

 

[Adam Jensen]

Second of all, these retards need to learn the difference between a slim adult woman and a little child.

In all honestly, people have to be mentally disabled to not see the difference.

I wanted to fact check this comment, and well L/A

This isn't just a problem with lolicons, but with degenerates all over the internet. You cannot do any piece of art without retards affirming that you are as degenerate as them for the smallest things.
"Oh, that character of yours is barefeet all the time? It's obvious you are a footfag as us! You are doing it on purpose!"

I found a link to a video by a lolicon that explains that Diana's crotch area was "censored" by Capcom.

I'll take a wild guess: Maybe Capcom doesn't care about underage underware and prefer to not waste megabytes on irrelevant stuff? Just my modest opinion.

 

[volatile puar]

Yeah, this one's really bizarre. There's, like, no "naughty" coding in the character's design, behavior, or in-game treatment from what I can tell from footage of the game, official marketing materials, and whatever. She's (very) modestly-dressed, well-covered up, and acts like a child. Not a tongue-in-cheek "oh I'm really an 800 year old female spirit in a 7 year old girl's body, wink wink" kind of way, but a genuine "only been around for 7 years" child. There's no costume "hints" or teases, no "knowing smirks," no flirting, no winks, no secret sex scenes (thank fucking Christ for that), nothing. She's an actual kid.

There's no avoiding it here -- any sexualization of this character is coming straight from the pedophiles. There's nothing in-game suggesting anything sexual (at all, but especially not concerning her). It's all in the pervs' minds.

More evidence on the pile to suggest that pedophiles see little difference between a normal interaction with a child/children in normal clothing and naked children

The most seemingly arousing stimuli were, in order, the consenting adult audio-tape, the naked women, and the "consenting" child audio-tape, with a nearly identical level of sexual arousal for all remaining stimuli, which in order are: child rape audio-tapes, naked girl slides, social encounter with child audio-tapes, clothed child slides, and child assault audio-tape.

 

[moocow]

More evidence on the pile to suggest that pedophiles see little difference between a normal interaction with a child/children in normal clothing and naked children

Holy fucking shit. Were they doing research just on sex offenders or something, or the general public? Because I can easily see myself calmly reaching across a table to strangle someone for playing me an audio recording of a child allegedly being abused and asking calmly how it "makes me feel." No healthy person would tolerate even a moment of that.

 

[volatile puar]

Holy fucking shit. Were they doing research just on sex offenders or something, or the general public? Because I can easily see myself calmly reaching across a table to strangle someone for playing me an audio recording of a child allegedly being abused and asking calmly how it "makes me feel." No healthy person would tolerate even a moment of that.

They (at least wanted to seem like they) wanted to test male sexuality in the general population, but they filtered out all normal men by recruiting via an advertisement that basically said "we will pay you to goon", and then filtered out all non-pedophiles (very few of the respondents were filtered out in this way, unsurprisingly) by explaining to them that they would be given child porn for the purpose of sexual arousal. 20% of the subjects admitted to being pedophiles and 3 admitted to "engaging in pedophilic behavior". To clarify here, "child" in the study always meant a girl under the age of 13.

 

[Gibs]

I find it interesting and funny how this is causing a divide in the lolisho community and communities aligned to it. I think I can categorize the two opposing sides into the following: the purist side and the no limits side.

The Purist Side believes the lolisho content is inherently Japanese and anime-inspired. They believe it must follow a specific definition for fictional content to be considered as lolisho. Diana from Pramata is inherently a 3D character model with realistic graphics and art style. The purists believe this shouldn't be considered as lolisho, since it lacks the distinct Japanese anime art style. Also, it being 3D may be a reason as well, though some purists are fine with 3D as long as it caters to anime art styles.

Some on this side are opposed to such content based on real-life children. There is a claim that the character model for Diana is based on a real life child, though I have seen conflicting information about this. There are some on this side who tolerate or accept some aspects of the opposing side, but their disagreement is about definitions.


The No Limits Side has less strict criteria for what should be allowed. They basically believe all fictional content should have no limits at all. This side is a lot more diverse and overlaps with other communities such as ageplayers, 3D CGI lolishos, pro-fiction absolutists, and open pedophiles such as MAPs, pro-AI CSAM, and pro-child dolls/robots advocates, who want to use this to normalize pedophilia. Though this doesn't mean they are all the exact same, rather they are in the same agreement in context to Pragamata.

Since Diana is a fictional character, they believe it's totally morally fine to sexualize them since they are not a real-life person. Thus, this is how they believe there should be no limits in terms of sexualizing fiction. Some on this side consider some of the purists to be antis due to their opposition to realistic 3D CGI of childlike characters, such as Diana.

---

Here are some recent Twitter examples of this infighting.
N/A
N/A
More takes from self-declared lolishos opposing the claim Diana is a loli.
N/A / N/A / N/A
And defense from the no limits side. Though, the third tweet is kind of more neutral.
N/A / N/A / N/A

Both of these sides are degenerate gooners that are mentally ill. But it's funny seeing them fight each other.
Clearly the no limits side is morally the worse side, but I wish for both of them to suffer, especially the no limits side.

 

[Lazy Drei]

Certified Reddit™ moment.

Got to be absolutely vile for them to take this sort of action.

 

[moocow]

They (at least wanted to seem like they) wanted to test male sexuality in the general population, but they filtered out all normal men by recruiting via an advertisement that basically said "we will pay you to goon", and then filtered out all non-pedophiles (very few of the respondents were filtered out in this way, unsurprisingly) by explaining to them that they would be given child porn for the purpose of sexual arousal. 20% of the subjects admitted to being pedophiles and 3 admitted to "engaging in pedophilic behavior". To clarify here, "child" in the study always meant a girl under the age of 13.

Oh okay, so pedophiles self-selected for it, because literally fucking nobody healthy is going to hear "we're going to pay you to goon to child porn" and not try to murder the "researcher." Hell, that actually sounds like a good way to round up pedos pretty easily and quietly. When they show up for the "research session," lock the room and gas them all.

Still ... fucking gruesome results from the research anyway.

 

[Helping Friendly Book]

Yes I can't seperate "reality" from "fiction".
How did you understand?

86156-52626557a4c028c36aafa4d40978e1e5.mp4

If being against sexualizing children, regardless of whether they're real or not, makes me unable to tell the difference between reality and fiction, than so be it. It doesn't stop me from calling someone out for acting like/being a pedo faggot.

 

[Eternal Struggler]

Null is vindicated with this shit:

• "cute and funny"
• ""
• "Kani" /
• "Cunny"

These really are pedophile dogwhistles. You have every right to assume the worst of anyone that uses these unironically.

It can't be hard to carpet-ban all of these freaks from X. It can't be hard for Discord to scrape all users and carpet ban anyone using these.

Why can't they do the right thing?

 

[meager]

Both of these sides are degenerate gooners that are mentally ill. But it's funny seeing them fight each other.
Clearly the no limits side is morally the worse side, but I wish for both of them to suffer, especially the no limits side.

I remember a few months ago or so there was a smaller argument in the lolifag community about whether jerking it to the child android was ok. It seems like now it’s become a much larger schism, however.

Hopefully this leads to some kind of lolicon civil war. Nothing is more destructive to a community than infighting, after all.

 

[Nick Gars]

A splinter Pragmata subreddit, dedicated to pornography of the small childlike android character has been banned.

View attachment 8579284

The character in question looks like this, so there is no ambiguity about what kind of character this is. There is no “it’s just a body type!!!!” excuse.

View attachment 8579292

PPP was so on the money when he was giving this game an absolute thrashing during the State of Play. At this point, with how prevelant and "in your face" loli/pedo shit is these days, part of me believes this was the dev teams intention to begin with. You don't need a half naked little girl (that oversized jacket is suspect) as a fucking plot device.

 

[Gatdam Animal Person]

A splinter Pragmata subreddit, dedicated to pornography of the small childlike android character has been banned.

View attachment 8579284

The character in question looks like this, so there is no ambiguity about what kind of character this is. There is no “it’s just a body type!!!!” excuse.

View attachment 8579292

I've learned two things today:
- There is a game that looks like if RE and Death Stranding had a baby. Looks fine, but I'm not willing to send over $90 for it.
- The Pædofinder General struck again. Very cool!

 

[Sneed Chuckson]

We really just need to round up every self-professed lolicon and murder them in cold blood. They are all liars. Every single one of them is a temporarily embarassed child molester. No more arguments, no more back and forth on twitter, dead pedophiles right now.

 

[General Emílio Médici]

They (at least wanted to seem like they) wanted to test male sexuality in the general population, but they filtered out all normal men by recruiting via an advertisement that basically said "we will pay you to goon", and then filtered out all non-pedophiles (very few of the respondents were filtered out in this way, unsurprisingly) by explaining to them that they would be given child porn for the purpose of sexual arousal. 20% of the subjects admitted to being pedophiles and 3 admitted to "engaging in pedophilic behavior". To clarify here, "child" in the study always meant a girl under the age of 13.

There is a thread here on the farms about Lolcows of History with one of the founders of "sexology" and in it OP explains how that retard pretty much fudged all the numbers to make the most heinous degeneracy look like it was super common: He virtually never had regular well adjusted people come to anwser his questionnaires and take part in research, because this was the late 1940s and early 1950s and no well adjusted and normal member of the public was gonna risk social suicide with that shit.

So how could he get the data? Maybe he could contact doctors of gynecology and proctology and try to contact patients? Maybe he could do some anonimized tests? Or he could try and slowly build up a sample size of regular people with more stealth ways so they wouldn't have to be afraid of sharing these things?

No. He mostly relied on people who already were degenerate and wouldn't have trouble just oversharing this shit. Like criminals already in jail for sexual crimes and prostitutes.

And wouldn't you know, it turned out that the prevalence of homossexuality, pedophilia, sexual abuse of children and animals and more were far more common than thought of at the time! Wow! What a crazy result! Surely this applied to the general population at large and there was no selection bias whatsover!

It sounds like the study you are talking about is the proud descendant of this early pioneer, maintaining the tradition of select for maximum degeneracy before they even start gathering data and then acting like the results are worth something. Like asking if people like raw fish by exclusively questioning japanese food customers.