- Joined
- Jul 23, 2024
Do you think Lolicon/Shotacon stuff will ever stop? As people become more aware of it, there is alot of pushback on it, especially with Western audiences
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rate me optimistic, it probably will be phased out due to pushback from South Korea and China. The reason the industry is in a bad state to begin with is because they don't have the global appeal that they could have.Do you think Lolicon/Shotacon stuff will ever stop? As people become more aware of it, there is alot of pushback on it, especially with Western audiences
Fair enough.This is wrong.
It looks like rape, because we apply human qualities to animals. The mating rituals for ferrets looks like domestic violence to us, however female ferrets specifically choose the most aggressive males because they are predators and prey animals. There are tons of predators lurking in every corner of their world, and so they need to be aggressive to ward off those threats.
Because of that, female ferrets do not ovulate unless they're fighting with the male. Keep in mind that the females are usually the initial aggressors.
Similarly, zebra mares won’t mate with any male that doesn't fight everything that threatens the herd. When you're in the African savannah as a prey animal, aggression is the key to survival.
Humans on the other hand are as far removed from nature as we come. We don’t have to worry about Komodo dragons, tigers, polar bears, hippos, dingos, jackals or lions on a daily basis because we can just throw rocks at them (gunfire is just a more advanced way of doing that).
Above all else, we have the privilege of being able to reason and ponder in ways that most animals in the animal kingdom cannot. We can say “that's fucked” or “loyalty good” since we no longer live nomadically.
We can only hope. The more anime expands, the more it must bend to the outside world. That's pure economics. Eventually they will hit a hard cap of watchers/readers if they do not get rid of the pedo shit.Do you think Lolicon/Shotacon stuff will ever stop? As people become more aware of it, there is alot of pushback on it, especially with Western audiences
No. There will always be dark corners of the internet/planet that they will crawl too.Do you think Lolicon/Shotacon stuff will ever stop? As people become more aware of it, there is alot of pushback on it, especially with Western audiences
Rate me optimistic, it probably will be phased out due to pushback from South Korea and China. The reason the industry is in a bad state to begin with is because they don't have the global appeal that they could have.
Appealing to only jobless Hikikomori with arrested development is only viable for so long.
I would mostly agree, other East Asian Markets aren't that much into it. Lolicon is probably never going to go away but will most likely just decrease in popularity. It's still semi-liked in Japan and some western fans. But as more people get attracted to Anime, a lot of people are going to take notice and get disgustedFair enough.
We can only hope. The more anime expands, the more it must bend to the outside world. That's pure economics. Eventually they will hit a hard cap of watchers/readers if they do not get rid of the pedo shit.
We should also ban all rape porn too. Rapie is badie.
We're nowhere near human extinction so that'd be maybe the most retarded argument of all.I really don't think that's a good point to make considering some retard could always mental gymnastic their way into a "Hurr durr REPOPULATION" argument, which is retarded and degenerate.
He explicitly condemned it, you can disagree but he objectively said nothing immoral.I think it was worth objecting to because it was kind of fucked up to say
This alone should make everyone "antis", Gogeta is the coolest fusion and SS4 is the coolest form.Fun fact really lolicons hate Super Saiyan 4 Gogeta Cause le antis
Damn RightThis alone should make everyone "antis", Gogeta is the coolest fusion and SS4 is the coolest form.
See this baffling response below:How the fuck did we get on the topic of the natural utility of rape? This thread is retarded.
Hope this helped.Violence has a place both culturally and evolutionarily. War. Policing. Capital punishment. Self defense. Defense of others. There are many viable reasons to premeditate and practice violence, some of them are even considered honorable.
Even rape, while socially detrimental, is a viable mating strategy in nature. While it should be discouraged, the desire to rape is at least understandable on an animalistic level.
Sexual attraction to children is neither of these things. It is not a viable mating strategy, and it has no socially beneficial application. It is pure degeneracy.
I, of course, applaud Josh for sticking to his principles. Having a troonolicon free and NSFW free website is fucking good and we can mock these twats for who they are. Even if some folks came here thinking they could be imbecilles, they were quickly corrected.
How is "rape is understandable" not immoral? He can condemn it all he wants. He opened his mouth to justify it in any case.He explicitly condemned it, you can disagree but he objectively said nothing immoral.
Rape is immoral and not at all understandable like he was trying to claim. It was pretty immoral to try and justify it, there wasn't even any reason for him to say that really. Rape isn't a "viable mating strategy at all", it's not nature for human beingsHe explicitly condemned it, you can disagree but he objectively said nothing immoral.
Fucking glorious!Damn Right
View attachment 7244202
At most it was an unnecessary comment by him, but you can't acknowledge he condemned it while simultaneously accusing him of justifying it (he didn't). Regardless, this thread isn't about the viability (or lack thereof) of rape as a mating strategy in nature anyway, so no point in arguing about it further.How is "rape is understandable" not immoral? He can condemn it all he wants. He opened his mouth to justify it in any case.
See above.Rape is immoral and not at all understandable like he was trying to claim. It was pretty immoral to try and justify it, there wasn't even any reason for him to say that really. Rape isn't a "viable mating strategy at all", it's not nature for human beings
I really don't want to slapfight with you over this because I agree with everything else in your post, but,He explicitly condemned it, you can disagree but he objectively said nothing immoral.
I don't think you could treat these as an "explicit condemnation" when he qualifies it with "it's a viable mating strategy in nature", and "it's at least understandable on an animalistic level".Even rape, while socially detrimental, is a viable mating strategy in nature. While it should be discouraged, the desire to rape is at least understandable on an animalistic level.
If calling it animalistic, socially detrimental, and saying it should not be encouraged isn't an explicit condemnation then I don't know what is. It's just a fact that it's one method of impregnating a female in nature, and it's one he seems to have wholly condemned.I really don't want to slapfight with you over this because I agree with everything else in your post, but,
I don't think you could treat these as an "explicit condemnation" when he qualifies it with "it's a viable mating strategy in nature", and "it's at least understandable on an animalistic level".
It's a method that isn't natural in the first place, it's not a "nature" thing for human beings.. It's not even a good mating strategy or a viable one for so many reasons. It's just ridiculous and pointless to say, he says "socially detrimental" because he otherwise believes it's "nature and understandable to a degree" . It's not nature and it's not understandable, it's being mentally demented, it's not a natural human instinct for a man to want to rape a woman ...If calling it animalistic, socially detrimental, and saying it should not be encouraged isn't an explicit condemnation then I don't know what is. It's just a fact that it's one method of impregnating a female in nature, and it's one he seems to have wholly condemned.
I'll again say maybe it was an unnecessary comment to begin with, but that's about the extent of his fault imo.
And that is honestly the best option. You basically get to vanish or be whoever you want. And the people you interact with are way more varied often than the locals and chances of finding people with same interests are higher. And honestly, might also be safer.She chose the latter.
Sounds like the thing a 16-17 year old would say honestly, sounds like the response a 9 year old would give as well.(sorry for doubleposting I forgot to quote this!!! do not mind me!!)
View attachment 7238821View attachment 7238824
I saw these a while ago, but I didn't know if to post because she was 16-17 at the time of posting these.. Regardless, I think it's really fucking weird for a 16-17 year old
You almost had a point for a second there, but the idea that just seeing a random titty magazine once as a kid is "abuse" and "trauma" is straight up fucking psychotic.I think one thing that tends to be overlooked when people talk about victims of sexual abuse is that it doesn't always rise to the level of molestation or physical touch. For example, if a child is exposed to pornography too early, that is also a form of abuse that can warp their development and lead to issues as an adult. And I don't just mean, like, their uncle put a hardcore porn video on the television. If there's a neighborhood kid who got his hands on a porn magazine and is showing it to other kids, that can also be damaging to the psyche of a young child.
I am convinced that every person who has one of these degenerate paraphilias, whether they are a pedophile, a homosexual, a transsexual, or any other shade of the rainbow coalition, they all have some kind of trauma like this in their past. If you make this argument, they will respond by saying "I was never molested." But it could have been something as simple as I described above. The bottom line is that they were exposed to pornography or some form of sexuality at too young an age and it twisted their psyche.
This is why there are no "good ones." They're all mentally ill, and anyone in the LGBTQIAPP+ spectrum needs therapy at the very least, and to be closely monitored for the rest of their lives to ensure that they don't pass on their sickness. And parents, you should be very observant of who you let your kids hang out with, and make sure your kids feel secure enough to confide in you if little Johnny from across the street is running around with a porno.
EDIT: Also pornography should be banned across the board. That would help solve a lot of these issues.
Being shown that is objectively abuse.You almost had a point for a second there, but the idea that just seeing a random titty magazine once as a kid is "abuse" and "trauma" is straight up fucking psychotic.