Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
When I was referring to "loli spectrum" I was solely talking about body type. If we look past over fads like "adult in mind" we probably will have something like:

Adult loli (aka petite woman) → Loli Baba (at least Friren is also most likely in petite woman territory) → Oppai Loli (in the middle, because it gets slippery) → Teen Loli → True Loli → Toddlercon Territory.

I get that this classification might have problems, but that's how I see it.

Its them trying to use someone like Frieren and normalize lolicon.

I personally do not see Frieren as a Loli. While she does have her laziness, and moments of acting childish (hating cleaning, hating making her own food. Wow! Child-like right?), she very clearly acts like an adult AND sounds like an adult.

These pedophiles however want to try and use her body type and insist that "Frieren IS a loli! So if you're against loli, you are against Frieren!"
 
These pedophiles however want to try and use her body type and insist that "Frieren IS a loli! So if you're against loli, you are against Frieren!"
According to that logic if someone dislikes furries now means that they want to ban Bugs Bunny.

The original argument isn't disproved, they just deflected the argument from "gooning to child characters is weird" to "now you have to hate Frieren too, because lolicons define her as a loli"
Which just proofs that they think "liking a character = gooning to said character". Wow lolicon you sure called us out.
 
Too bad Chibi Reviews gave the game away for the "spectrum" himself.

Whoops.
View attachment 8978252
"You see bro, that's a loli grandma I'm jerking off to. My fellow pedophiles and I have all come to the conclusion that she is a loli so if you're against lolis you're against grandmas".

That's great and everything now get into the woodchipper after the baby rapists.
 
Those heckin' leftists! Lolicon IS just fiction, it's just the evil leftists who call it lolicon because they say racist and nazi! Isn't that right, @Azchan ?

View attachment 8979458
I don't understand the logic for getting angry at "muh cheapening" definition and "helping pedophiles hide", even if I do ignore the reality of what is that gets their rocks off. Isn't their whole tard group happily going around talking about how young they like their cartoon porn and how women above the age of 11 are hags?

If I assume every self-proclaimed lolicon is only in it for the ficton, their behavior online still serves for le real pedophiles to hide among them because they create spaces where saying "I think tight child pussy is fucking hot and the age of consent should be abolished" isn't immediately met with disgust but encouraged with hundreds of " OMG DAS SO BASSSSED I WANT TO FUCK CHILDREN TOO" messages. Every time they pull arguments like these I just think they lack the ability to self-reflect, or establish causality as to why they get called pedophiles.
 
Last edited:
Every time they pull arguments like these I just think they lack the ability to self-reflect, or establish causality as to why they get called pedophiles.
Like I said previously, they are purposefully conflating the term pedophile with child molesting.

They never answer the question if why they are attracted to drawn images that are meant to repesent children and only call you a retard and just say you can't seperate fiction from reality.

how it feels like.jpg
 
I don't understand the logic for getting angry at "muh cheapening" definition and "helping pedophiles hide", even if I do ignore the reality of what is that gets their rocks off. Isn't their whole tard group happily going around talking about how young they like their cartoon porn and how women above the age of 11 are hags?
They are gaslighting. And that's what I hate the most in this discourse and many others. You notice something yourself, then go "hey what's up with this?" and they try to make you look crazy, paranoid, that you are actually helping cover up REAL pedophiles by devaluing the word or like you are one yourself. This Pragmata discourse is a good example of gaslighting. There are people who saw it and went "that's weird..." then were accused of all sort of things for merely voicing their concerns.

I remember playing through Dead Rising 2 as Chuck who was protecting his daughter during a zombie outbreak. You felt for Chuck and his worries. You had to constantly take care of her safety and look for zombrex on a time limit to prevent her infection progressing. And if she died, Chuck would just suicide (or go crazy in Off The Record). None of this lolifaggotry was present at all, even in the online discourse no one could even fathom that such degeneracy could exist. Here's the intro of it where you escort her to a safe house: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNRNCA3ctto
1778339437946.png 1778339463669.png 1778339525261.png
She looks like and acts like a normal kid. She doesn't have a lore "reason" to walk barefoot or for some other weird shit. The game wasn't advertised with her as a central point with well known pedophilic dogwhistles. And she wasn't portrayed as some silly, cutesy anime girl (traits weebs love in their "waifus"). While the game could be comedic at times, it was way more fitting of the "muh fatherhood" cope pragmata defenders love to use.

And while there will be some sick fucks who will still post weird shit, there is no denying the intentional leaning towards the weirdos in case of Pragmata. No one will convince me otherwise. That is MY opinion, not some react streamer's or a politcal account's on twitter. Ironically the people who accuse others of just parroting others do just that themselves.
 
She looks like and acts like a normal kid. She doesn't have a lore "reason" to walk barefoot or for some other weird shit. The game wasn't advertised with her as a central point with well known pedophilic dogwhistles. And she wasn't portrayed as some silly, cutesy anime girl (traits weebs love in their "waifus"). While the game could be comedic at times, it was way more fitting of the "muh fatherhood" cope pragmata defenders love to use.
And most of the time she spent the time in the security room anyways with Stacey, Because it's the most reasonable thing do to during another zombie apocalypse.

I still enjoyed how you were able to gift her a lot of stuff, Even a god damn tamed tiger lol!

But even in DR2 Case 0 you get to see how he even managed to protect her during their time in that lil town, It's an exquisite appetizer before you get to play DR2 > DR2OTR > DR2 Case West.

But basically you just nailed it, just a the daughter protagonist that must be given zombrex every 24hrs and that's pretty much it plain and simple.

In DR3 it was introduced but that's a story for another thread...
 
I don't necessarily think people SHOULD be arrested for "mere drawings" but I'm not going to cry a river if they get arrested for having drawn depictions of children in sexual acts. On the "freedom of expression" angle, call me a hecking moralfag but I don't believe that depicting children in sexual situations (in a way that is indistinguishable from other types of illustrated pornography) should be protected under freedom of expression.

Loli faggots, because they have wanked themselves retarded, believe this means that "antis" believe that you should never be able to show a child in a sexual context EVER. No one has ever claimed that.
Lolipedos believe that any form of nudity involving children is sexual or no different from blatantly sexualized depictions of children.

Take the lolicon lolcow Joey Bizinger/The Anime Man as an example. In 2017 (when his and his e-prostitute girlfriend Aki's threads on lolcow and the now defunct website PULL were still active), he made a video talking about censorship in anime and a show called Made in Abyss. When it was airing, it was criticized for sexualizing its underage female main character. JoHobo's argument was that actually, the nudity in the show is isn't sexual at all because it's supposed to be comedic – which for some reason means it can't be sexual – and that it's no different from the nudity shown in the Ghibli' movie 火垂るの墓/Grave of the fireflies.
TL;DW His argument is that this image
4988008091113.jpg
and this image
eaecc8925185bad370f77929dfb41edd05693a91.png
are no different from each other. If you think so, you're the one who's a pedophile.

Side note: I had to scroll past what was probably thousands of hentai and pornography-related videos before I found this video as I couldn't remember the show's name or the video title. JoHobo and Aki are both massive coomers.
 
Those heckin' leftists! Lolicon IS just fiction, it's just the evil leftists who call it lolicon because they say racist and nazi! Isn't that right, @Azchan ?

Screenshot_20260509_053313_Chrome.jpg
I HATE when people say OP is a fag because really it cheapens the definition of faggots (actual homosexuals), and has nothing to do with the fact that OP can't stop himself from sucking dicks.
 
Those heckin' leftists! Lolicon IS just fiction, it's just the evil leftists who call it lolicon because they say racist and nazi! Isn't that right, @Azchan ?

View attachment 8979458
Just a reminder this mongoloid spic piece of shit goons on main with AI images & videos, have a child-like vtumor model and sounds legit like a 33 years old puerto rican nigger, If i must elaborate more on why this bitch it's irrelevant in the farms then idk what else to tell ya.

Kill pedozehara. Behead pedozehara. Roundhouse kick pedozehara into the concrete. Slam dunk pedozehara into the trashcan. Beat the hell out of pedoazehara with a baseball bat. all the 8 yards of the worst for this excuse of breath.
 
KaniMilks is PISSED after being called a pedophile, cause he is. He is now attempting (and failing) to discredit the site like every other fail troll.
L/A
nitter.net_KaniMilks_status_2053175484620423614.png
nitter.net_KaniMilks_status_2053175484620423614 (1).png
x.com_KaniMilks.png

Here is another attempt to discredit the site.
L/A
x.com_KaniMilks_status_2053106211156095448.png

He then gas lights himself that the site reputation is "beyond destroyed". Even though a few days before Joon the King made a video which credited the forum LMAO.
L/A
x.com_KaniMilks (2).png

"Until Morale Improves" translates to until he can rape kids.
L/A
x.com_KaniMilks (1).png

Then he used a pedophile dog whistle cause he is a pedophile.
L/A
x.com_KaniMilks_status_2053079790752555271.png

He then had a heart attack just by seeing the communist logo.
L/A
x.com_KaniMilks (6).png


This is before and after he jerked off to little kids again.
x.com_KaniMilks (5).pngx.com_KaniMilks (4).pngx.com_KaniMilks (3).png
 
If I assume every self-proclaimed lolicon is only in it for the ficton, their behavior online still serves for le real pedophiles to hide among them
I used to believe their defenses of the behavior. Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that "real" pedophiles have 0 extra attraction to anime kids. When other factors outside the art style are highlighted they will say the things highlighted aren't exclusive to children. Examples:
  • Calling someone "Daddy, teacher..."
  • Wearing childlike clothing (preschooler outfit, red backpack...)
  • Using the word "child" to refer to the character ("child belly erotic") or explicitly stating their age
If an adult woman calls someone daddy, does that make it pedophilia? If an attractive woman wears a red backpack, does that suddenly make her unattractive? Does making a buxom anime girl canonically 14 mean you're a pedophile for finding them attractive? Probably not, and they will use that to say that all of this taken together has 0 correlation with what pedophiles want.

Can a lolicon tell me what the difference is between a pedophile saying the "bratty child" is hot and a lolicon saying the "bratty child" is hot?
 
I think it's time for us to address how horrible 4chan is when it comes to this stuff.
So many threads of loli/shota filth and the mods are completely complacent with it.
For example, despite loli/shota being banned from every board except /b/ and /trash/ (I say it should be banned on all boards but i digress.) the /ic/ board has a regular loli/shota general that stays up despite it should be against the rules: https://boards.4chan.org/ic/thread/7934545/lsg-loli-shota-general
And they're invading the entire site.
Now allow me to reveal a personal story of mine.
I use a trip on 4chan, and one day during a Mouthwashing thread on /v/ i called out the devs for using shock tactics to try to regain their 15 minutes of fame and i made a statement against rape.
This caused someone to become so obsessed with me that they stole my trip and impersonated me.
After the thread was over i thought it wouldn't happen again, until i ran into the exact same guy later in a loli thread as i was outspoken against it and there he was defending loli using my name and trip, convincing others that he's me while saying and posting disgusting pro loli propaganda.
I wouldn't know how serious it was until later someone confronted me saying they have evidence on me and that they sent to the FBI. Turns out the guy impersonating me was posting child pornography with my identity convincing others that i'm the one doing it.
And he didn't stop as later again another online vigilante confronted me with even more evidence and as far as i know the guy is still posting child pornography on 4chan and the people there, especially the janitors and mods, are either complacent or in on it.
And i can confirm that at least one of the loli threads on /v/ i was fighting against had child porn posted in it and stayed up long enough for several anons to look at it and support it.
TL'DR, 4chan is run by pedophiles and the 4chan staff are doing nothing about it, if not even joining in on it.
The image i provided is proof of what i said about my impersonator is true.
 

Attachments

  • oufbodufdoi.png
    oufbodufdoi.png
    160.6 KB · Views: 127
Jersh is getting epically owned by Mr. Obvious. What shall we ever do!
oh no! the 14 year old jersh who did things 14 years do is being called a horrible person! That totally equates to the 35 year old manchild nigger saying the "brats need correction" 700 times a day! You see Chuds, that's how we own you!

they really are not sending their best soldiers. incredible. And ALL of this because of a fucking AI meme. It truly is glorious!
 
Back
Top Bottom