I do think it's extremely retarded to criminalize certain types of drawings, it's a step towards a totalitarian system. Anyone should be free to draw anything, as long as it is mere drawings. This however doesn't mean that stuff like lolis isn't a substitute for the real thing, I think it's important to separate these two concerns instead of mixing them into one. So all in all it isn't so simple because some of these people most probably have concerning stuff on their hard drives that should be investigated by the police. A compromise between freedom of expression and concerns regarding one's use of such freedom is to allow investigation that leads to no consequences if nothing real is found.
I do think it's extremely retarded to criminalize certain types of drawings, it's a step towards a totalitarian system. Anyone should be free to draw anything, as long as it is mere drawings. This however doesn't mean that stuff like lolis isn't a substitute for the real thing, I think it's important to separate these two concerns instead of mixing them into one. So all in all it isn't so simple because some of these people most probably have concerning stuff on their hard drives that should be investigated by the police. A compromise between freedom of expression and concerns regarding one's use of such freedom is to allow investigation that leads to no consequences if nothing real is found.
They are still pedophiles though, that's the thing. All they do is make anti-censorship laws easier to pass because they're the perfect example. Same thing with trannies. A loud minority being extremely perverse and annoying, and now the average person wants nothing to do with them.
They are still pedophiles though, that's the thing. All they do is make anti-censorship laws easier to pass because they're the perfect example. Same thing with trannies. A loud minority being extremely perverse and annoying, and now the average person wants nothing to do with them.
My post is about the related laws and their consequences, not the obvious social consequences of releasing or possessing such drawings. As I said, lolis are an obvious substitute for the real thing and I'd personally prefer that such content shouldn't be normalized at all because it is detrimental to society and its morales (though thanks to faggots, trannies and other niggers normalizing their sodomistic tendencies and stuff like that, we are fucking deranged already and it's only getting worse).
Silly Green Redditors, writing walls of text yet you don't know that the PEDO tag does not necessarily mean the content is geared towards pedophiles. You would've known if you browsed the PEDO tag instead of being tourists.
I wonder how the Japanese politicians feel about the holiday getting hijack by abunch of pedophiles drawing CP anime bikini terbo illegal images for it.
I was going to write a long effort post about the amount of replies to the original vid talking about "correction" and how "smug" the character is and how it's a "brat" (for exhibiting behaviour typical of a child (because they're paedophiles)) but loliniggers don't even have the common courtesy of actually having rebuttals. They just scream projection when you say masturbating to cartoon children is not only harmful for the consumer but also normalises sexualised depictions of children (which they accuse the jews of doing via hollywood (i.e. cuties) all the time but they can never see the irony in that because they're fake nazis)
I was going to write a long effort post about the amount of replies to the original vid talking about "correction" and how "smug" the character is and how it's a "brat" (for exhibiting behaviour typical of a child (because they're paedophiles)) but loliniggers don't even have the common courtesy of actually having rebuttals. They just scream projection when you say masturbating to cartoon children is not only harmful for the consumer but also normalises sexualised depictions of children (which they accuse the jews of doing via hollywood (i.e. cuties) all the time but they can never see the irony in that because they're fake nazis)
I do think it's extremely retarded to criminalize certain types of drawings, it's a step towards a totalitarian system. Anyone should be free to draw anything, as long as it is mere drawings. This however doesn't mean that stuff like lolis isn't a substitute for the real thing, I think it's important to separate these two concerns instead of mixing them into one. So all in all it isn't so simple because some of these people most probably have concerning stuff on their hard drives that should be investigated by the police. A compromise between freedom of expression and concerns regarding one's use of such freedom is to allow investigation that leads to no consequences if nothing real is found.
I don't necessarily think people SHOULD be arrested for "mere drawings" but I'm not going to cry a river if they get arrested for having drawn depictions of children in sexual acts. On the "freedom of expression" angle, call me a hecking moralfag but I don't believe that depicting children in sexual situations (in a way that is indistinguishable from other types of illustrated pornography) should be protected under freedom of expression.
Loli faggots, because they have wanked themselves retarded, believe this means that "antis" believe that you should never be able to show a child in a sexual context EVER. No one has ever claimed that.
Beserk is one of if not the most critically acclaimed manga of all time. In "The Golden Age, Chapter 2" Guts is shown being raped as a child by an older man.
There is a clear difference between this and loli/shota hentai. One is in service of the story and explains a core feature of Guts' character (his general misanthropy), loli/shota hentai shows children in sexual situations because the audience are attracted to that and want to masturbate to it. If a story has a character in it and a key feature of their character is that they were sexually abused as a child you can show that in a way that is not sexually arousing as the beserk example shows. You can tell mature stories that involve child sex abuse, that is protected under freedom of expression. "Antis" aren't against this, they are against illustrated depictions of children being sexualised because it is clearly being used by paedophiles to fulfil their desires to have sex with actual children. Also loli/shota hentai almost always shows full frontal nudity, again call me a hecking moralfag but I don't believe you should ever be allowed to depict naked children besides for medical purposes. (i.e. Paediatricians textbooks)
Why do you masturbate to certain pornography? You do it because you are attracted to the act/person being depicted and would like to participate in that sexual act. Lolicon logic is never used for any other type of pornography, if someone regularly masturbated to illustrated depictions of bestiality it is not unreasonable to call that person a zoophile. When I say lolicons are paedophiles I am not saying that they are actively harming children, I am saying that they are attracted to children because they masturbate to sexualised depictions of children.
I believe it should be illegal to depict or possess illustrated pornography depicting children because it normalises said depictions. Go onto any hentai website a large proportion of the content held there is loli/shota shit. If someone goes on there to masturbate to otherwise innocuous "vanilla" hentai and instead finds loli/shota shit it could very well lead them to developing a sexual attraction to childlike features that by it's very nature will make them sexually aroused when they see those features on actual children. A child does not need to be harmed for me to find this content disgusting, I want less offending and non-offending paedophiles in the world. Polite society is not compatible with paedophilic (meaning the sexual attraction to children, by its very definition loli/shota hentai is paedophilic) material being allowed to exist.
Lolicons will also tell you that you are "projecting" when you see a illustrated depiction of a child in a sexual situation or a drawing of a child that is clearly meant to induce attraction. Like with the bestiality example this logic is never used on any other content. Here are cutscenes from the game "Zenless Zone Zero":
0:08
No one would ever tell you that this (especially the left half) is not trying to be sexually arousing to the games gooner audience. It is clear to everyone that the devs know that sex sells and are capitalising on that by featuring an attractive woman to suck in the gooners. When the same thing is done with a character with childlike features lolicons will sit there and lie to you that it in no way shape or form is sexual and the fact that you saw this clear attempt to attract the lolicon audience as exactly what it is means that it is actually YOU who is a paedophile because you can tell when paedophiles are being catered to.
I wrote this because I wanted to explain in detail why I am against loli/shota hentai while also being pro freedom of expression but I don't know why I bothered. Some lolicon will see this and scream projection at me because I included the beserk example as a reference.
You faggots stopped talking about Epstein to sperg about gay nigger game made of pixels. Please stop being a cattle and let's talk about something funny for a change.
KaniMilks is back to coping about the forum from the Chibi thread. L/A L/A
He also seems to be coping about this thread. Given he made a post coping about a post made by @Pat Mustard. L/A These posts were made after he was jerking off to little kids.
He also seems to be suffering with Insomnia. Probably also had hallucinations of the glowies arresting him and confiscating his hard drives. L/A
So now speech deemed "not valuable" by some literally-who wannabe child molester can be censored? Sounds awfully hypocritical to me.
Just a guess from the AI garbage on his profile, it's probably a subhuman brown. Also 788 posts just in April and this first week in May is fucking ridiculous. 21 (technically 21.3) posts per day if you're generous and include the entire month of April. Really going for gold when it comes to disappointing your entire bloodline, Kani.
I will admit, I made a 'farms account to bash on stupidity of lolicons, at least that's how I feel currently, lmao.
I come to observe that "fiction does not affect reality" is essentially a mantra of affirmation and ignorance, I guess. I think less controversial example of fiction affecting reality would be the techbros of past days that were watching Star Trek, reading cyberpunk novels - and there we are having our smartphones and AI slop, but I digress. General porn arguments actually based on self-control and moral, at least for some. I saw how 'ethical gooners' were waging war on Chibi-types on xeeter, but that's whole another story.
I think of myself as 'relaxed' on most sexual question, but is BAD that I think that fictional prepubescent children is a slippery slope?
True. Not to sound autistic but fiction can affect how people perceive the world, just look at the field of history. The middel ages are famous for being wrongly potrayed by the media and historians are rightfully frustrated, because it gives people a wrong image of that time.
If you consume lolicon long enough you'll become desensitized, because you tend to seek people out who reinforce that consuming that kind of porn is normal. In the end they are no different to other addicts, they will also try to convince you that it's not that bad and you are just "no fun".
He also seems to be coping about this thread. Given he made a post coping about a post made by @Pat Mustard. L/A View attachment 8973994 These posts were made after he was jerking off to little kids.
He also seems to be suffering with Insomnia. Probably also had hallucinations of the glowies arresting him and confiscating his hard drives. L/A View attachment 8973985
So now speech deemed "not valuable" by some literally-who wannabe child molester can be censored? Sounds awfully hypocritical to me. View attachment 8974131
Just a guess from the AI garbage on his profile, it's probably a subhuman brown. Also 788 posts just in April and this first week in May is fucking ridiculous. 21 (technically 21.3) posts per day if you're generous and include the entire month of April. Really going for gold when it comes to disappointing your entire bloodline, Kani.
Really? Is that what happens when lolicons interact with the Sharty? I thought it went more like this: View attachment 8974151
Lol. I don't know man I think making 790 posts when the account was made in late April sounds like you've been coping hard non-stop. While you've been jerking off to little kids non-stop. He also seems to confirm he doesn't want freedom of speech. Probably because we kept calling him out for being a pedophile that jerks off to CP, LMAO. L/A
