- Joined
- Jul 18, 2025
In a sense, lolifags are currently what furfags were to the public before they gained widespread online acceptance. They have made their home in many communities, but are generally considered disgusting by normies and most people in general.
The main different is most furfags appeal to leftists using leftie arguments (It doesn’t hurt anyone!) while lolifags appeal to rightoids using rightoid arguments. (It’s free expression!) Obviously there are left-wing lolifags and right-wing furfags but this is true for the most outspoken people of each movement.
When confronted about their degeneracy, furfags will claim that their community just about anthro animals even if they were being openly degenerate minutes ago. Lolifags do something similar where they’ll claim to be fighting for all anime or against censorship in general instead of just their goon material.
Neither will actually deny that they jerk off to animals/children, but instead try to reframe their activities or redefine words to excuse themselves. Furries are just expressing themselves with their art, and lolicons are just fighting against censorship and protecting natural rights. It’s only zoophilia when they aren’t humanoid, and it’s not pedophilia because it’s just a drawing.
Of course, furfags have been more successful because leftism in general has taken over so many communities. The main hurdle is being seen as normal to the general public in the real world, which still would see them as very weird. Of course, if public acceptance was achieved, the push towards accepting actual bestiality would begin.
But people are getting sick of degenerate trannies and furfags online. They’re becoming sick of leftist retardation. That’s where the lolifags come in. The more the political climate online shifts right, the more opportunities lolifags have to make themselves seen as heroic defenders of liberty instead of pedophilic degenerates. That would be the key to allowing lolifags to permeate across the Internet.
In a sense, the communities can be seen as two boulders on different hills. Furfags are like the boulder that’s rolling down its hill; they’ve gotten acceptance across the Internet and any pushback is seen as heckin’ evil. Lolifags are like a boulder on top of a hill; they don’t really have much traction but certain events could cause them to gain widespread support. You could view what I’m saying as a team dedicated to stopping boulder-related disasters focusing on stopping the rolling boulder, allowing the still boulder to begin falling unchecked. A bit of a silly analogy, but I think you get the idea.
The main different is most furfags appeal to leftists using leftie arguments (It doesn’t hurt anyone!) while lolifags appeal to rightoids using rightoid arguments. (It’s free expression!) Obviously there are left-wing lolifags and right-wing furfags but this is true for the most outspoken people of each movement.
When confronted about their degeneracy, furfags will claim that their community just about anthro animals even if they were being openly degenerate minutes ago. Lolifags do something similar where they’ll claim to be fighting for all anime or against censorship in general instead of just their goon material.
Neither will actually deny that they jerk off to animals/children, but instead try to reframe their activities or redefine words to excuse themselves. Furries are just expressing themselves with their art, and lolicons are just fighting against censorship and protecting natural rights. It’s only zoophilia when they aren’t humanoid, and it’s not pedophilia because it’s just a drawing.
Of course, furfags have been more successful because leftism in general has taken over so many communities. The main hurdle is being seen as normal to the general public in the real world, which still would see them as very weird. Of course, if public acceptance was achieved, the push towards accepting actual bestiality would begin.
But people are getting sick of degenerate trannies and furfags online. They’re becoming sick of leftist retardation. That’s where the lolifags come in. The more the political climate online shifts right, the more opportunities lolifags have to make themselves seen as heroic defenders of liberty instead of pedophilic degenerates. That would be the key to allowing lolifags to permeate across the Internet.
In a sense, the communities can be seen as two boulders on different hills. Furfags are like the boulder that’s rolling down its hill; they’ve gotten acceptance across the Internet and any pushback is seen as heckin’ evil. Lolifags are like a boulder on top of a hill; they don’t really have much traction but certain events could cause them to gain widespread support. You could view what I’m saying as a team dedicated to stopping boulder-related disasters focusing on stopping the rolling boulder, allowing the still boulder to begin falling unchecked. A bit of a silly analogy, but I think you get the idea.
TL;DR: Lolicons are striving to do what furries have already done.
Last edited:
