Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Let's give a reasonable take on what this law actually bans. In the United States the criminal justice process has three steps: you first need to be investigated and charged by the police, then you need to be indicted by a grand jury, and finally you need to be convicted by a jury of your peers (or a judge if the defendant demanded it) to be punished for any crime. The pedophile community is afraid that they're going to go to prison for playing their cp games like Browndust, is that going to happen? Well, first you would need a police officer to search your phone and find the lewd images of children in the game, and he would need to be of the opinion that it's illegal pornography and charge you with possession. Then, they would need to hand you over to a grand jury to decide whether they think there's sufficient evidence to convict you in court (unlike a standard jury which are intentionally selected for the most easily manipulated members of society, grand jury members are usually selected based on their competence because the court doesn't want to waste its time). If they indict you, then you need 12 of your peers to agree that you're a sick fuck that needs to go to prison. All of this taken together is not super likely to happen, but it absolutely could, however it doesn't actually matter because anyone who would be in that situation would doubtless have more cp in their possession, so it would merely add one more count to their charge.
 
volatile puar said:
[snip]
Click to expand...
There are literally countless scores of retards who think that this law bans most anime. Even in the comments of that video that @Cheese_lad linked, there are people saying that.

This retardation is thanks to faggots like Chibi Reviews and H1BeesNuts who have been pushing this bullshit fear mongering narrative since day 1 that this law will "LITERALLY BAN ALL ANIME" and is the beginning of the end for free speech and artistic expression in America or some shit.

They're clearly aware that they are wrong, but they know that people are much more likely to oppose this law if they think it is some sweeping ban on anime and manga, rather than the reality of it only targeting obvious and extreme pornography (probably less than 1 percent of the content they are claiming it prohibits). In typical lolicon fashion, they can only get mainstream support by deceiving people and trying to leech off popular causes like "free speech" and "anti-censorship".


WelperHelper99 said:
Look at these freedom fighters, fucking damn. They'd have to leave the house first though
Click to expand...
The ones who act like they are political activists fighting against government tyranny on the front lines are absolutely hilarious. Chibi Reviews decided to share [A] this delusional tweet again:
1756844433952.webp
> Lolicons were the 1st line of defense against art censorship
Lmao you guys didn't do shit. You're all pedophiles, no one gives a fuck what you think.

If all of these people died tomorrow, the anti-censorship movement wouldn't just be unhindered, it would be better off.
 
volatile puar said:
If they indict you, then you need 12 of your peers to agree that you're a sick fuck that needs to go to prison.
Click to expand...
No, they only need to decided if the content fits the legal definition of obscene. Lolicons going to prison is entirely dependent on if the DA chooses to prosecute their case, so it’s going to be a county to county situation.
 
Nigga Bullshit said:
> Lolicons were the 1st line of defense against art censorship
Click to expand...
I think the first line was the Farms. Where were any of you niggers when Drop KF was happening? Gooning no doubt. And here we are today, where shit has gotten worse. Did the lolicons help then? No. Shut the fuck up.
 
Mad Hunter said:
Has anyone here brought up this artist named BlackaWhiplash? I swear to god this person is just one of the creepiest lolisho artists out there.





This lying person said all characters are depicted as adults.

OK. What about this?

View attachment 6967585

Those are BlackWhiplash's characters. I swear that person has DEFINITELY shown Dylan GOING TO SCHOOL AS IN SCHOOL FOR KIDS WITH OTHER KIDS. SAME WITH JUDAH. There are other OCs pretty much still high school minors. "All characters depicted as adults," my ass.



It doesn't help that Blackwhiplash tends to make porn of media popular with young zoomers and Gen Alphas like Demon Slayer, My Hero Academia, The Amazing Digital Circus, and Jujutsu Kaisen. That was a BIG red flag, even if Blackwhiplash happened to be sexualizing the adults. In fact, for Demon Slayer, Blackwhiplash sexualized 14 y/o Muichiro. Face me and call that "depicted as adults." Bitch you didn't even change the height and overall appearance.

The fact that Blackwhiplash makes child porn and R34 of characters from media popular with zoomers and Gen Alphas, many of which being minors, just makes me feel uncomfortable. It feels like a lure into a dangerous trap.

You know, I just really REALLY ABHOR the logic of "oh it's only fiction go be worried about real children." Why? It's only natural and positive even to express concern if a minor/minor-shaped character is placed in a sexual situation. No normal person would like to see a sexualized child.
Click to expand...
Thank God people are starting to hate that retard sheboon, I was surprised that for a long time people from Sharty or here don't talk about her.
By the way, there is already a raid thread about it: https://www.soyjak.st/raid/thread/213668.html#213668
 
Cheese_lad said:
No, they only need to decided if the content fits the legal definition of obscene. Lolicons going to prison is entirely dependent on if the DA chooses to prosecute their case, so it’s going to be a county to county situation.
Click to expand...
I mean that's the cope that people use about our jury system, in reality people vote entirely based on whether they think the guy should be punished, they don't care if he broke a law that they disagree with, and they don't care if he technically didn't break a law that they disagree with.
 
volatile puar said:
I mean that's the cope that people use about our jury system, in reality people vote entirely based on whether they think the guy should be punished, they don't care if he broke a law that they disagree with, and they don't care if he technically didn't break a law that they disagree with.
Click to expand...
While jury nullification is a thing, pretty much everyone who isn’t terminally online will agree that the lolifag is a pedophile for gooning to drawings of little kids. I doubt that will help much.
Nigga Bullshit said:
View attachment 7863682
Click to expand...
Nigga your artistic niche is child porn, shut the fuck up.
 
I'm still angry these filthy degenerate pieces of shit are why we can't have free speech on the internet. Fuck them
 
meager said:
While jury nullification is a thing, pretty much everyone who isn’t terminally online will agree that the lolifag is a pedophile for gooning to drawings of little kids. I doubt that will help much.
Click to expand...
I obviously have criticisms of our jury system, but they're not really relevant the question at hand because it's going to be manifestly obvious that the defendant had possession of the materials and that they really are cp in 90+% of cases, and the morality of the thing isn't really under debate. It is only relevant to this law insofar as it's obvious that the whole "lacking serious literary, artistic, or political value" thing is in the law solely so that no dumbass free speech extremist judge thinks it needs to be struck down as unconstitutional. Nobody really expects the jury to be arguing about whether Dorontabi's (hypothetical) political video essay that contains a (hypothetical) unabridged CSAM video has serious political value. If that really happened, nobody in the jury would dare to say "well, I guess it's okay because it's got political value". I had considered actually talking about what counts as serious literary, artistic, or political value, but then I remembered our laws aren't enforced by an educated class of judges who would have some opinion about whether or not Steven King's underage gangbang in "It" is legally acceptable, it's dependent entirely on how mostly ordinary people are feeling about it (in this specific case it would depend mostly on how much of a pedophile the guy who owns "It" is, if he seems like a normal guy people probably wouldn't find him guilty, if he seems like a Bathtub Ross kind of guy, they're probably gonna think he's guilty, although in that case it would obviously just be one count in his cp charge).
 
volatile puar said:
I obviously have criticisms of our jury system, but they're not really relevant the question at hand because it's going to be manifestly obvious that the defendant had possession of the materials and that they really are cp in 90+% of cases, and the morality of the thing isn't really under debate. It is only relevant to this law insofar as it's obvious that the whole "lacking serious literary, artistic, or political value" thing is in the law solely so that no dumbass free speech extremist judge thinks it needs to be struck down as unconstitutional. Nobody really expects the jury to be arguing about whether Dorontabi's (hypothetical) political video essay that contains a (hypothetical) unabridged CSAM video has serious political value. If that really happened, nobody in the jury would dare to say "well, I guess it's okay because it's got political value". I had considered actually talking about what counts as serious literary, artistic, or political value, but then I remembered our laws aren't enforced by an educated class of judges who would have some opinion about whether or not Steven King's underage gangbang in "It" is legally acceptable, it's dependent entirely on how mostly ordinary people are feeling about it (in this specific case it would depend mostly on how much of a pedophile the guy who owns "It" is, if he seems like a normal guy people probably wouldn't find him guilty, if he seems like a Bathtub Ross kind of guy, they're probably gonna think he's guilty, although in that case it would obviously just be one count in his cp charge).
Click to expand...
Have cunnyfags tried to use loopholes so they don’t get arrested for their shit? Considering fictional CP is already illegal in many places, I’m sure people have at least tried. I do imagine a lawyer in court trying to argue why the lolipedo gooning content actually makes a point on the current state of the government.
 
meager said:
Have cunnyfags tried to use loopholes so they don’t get arrested for their shit? Considering fictional CP is already illegal in many places, I’m sure people have at least tried. I do imagine a lawyer in court trying to argue why the lolipedo gooning content actually makes a point on the current state of the government.
Click to expand...
Maybe I'm being optimistic here, but I'm pretty sure that the average person understands on some level that pornography degrades the non-pornographic value of everything that it's in. Sure, they might think that Marvel's The Avengers has serious artistic or literary value just because it's entertaining, but they wouldn't believe that if there was a scene that would fit in an "adult parody" video in the middle of it, although the masses have been duped into believing the obscenity in Game of Thrones is acceptable, so maybe I'm giving them too much credit here.
 
volatile puar said:
however it doesn't actually matter because anyone who would be in that situation would doubtless have more cp in their possession
Click to expand...
Bingo, that's the real reason loliniggers are seething. They're not necessarily worried about lolicon, they're worried that police can now use lolicon as probable cause to search their hard drives and they're scared of their cp stash being found.
 
Cheese_lad said:
I know the a lot of people on this thread have been concerned about gov regulation on lolicon because of 1st amendment complications, but this law doesn’t seem to have any imaginable crossfire.
Click to expand...

When I try to talk libtards down from screeching about a tranny bathroom bill, I always point out:
"Do you think the police are staking out the ladies room? How quickly do think Police will show up to a report of a man in the women's shitter? For the bathroom bill to be enforced on a tranny just innocently going to listen to authentic female pissing noises, that Tranny would need to make woman uncomfortable enough for the police to be called, and then hang around in the women's rest room for 15+ minutes for the police to arrive. If they are doing that, they DO need be arrested."

My issue with stuff like Handley's case is they didn't have a lot of evidence, they just went fishing and got lolicon. a LOT of lolicon to be fair, but not photorealistic and not AI generated and no actual CSAM.

I am 120% in support of the AI provisions of the Texas bill, but the "Cartoon" part always felt like overreach for how harsh the punishment was.
I feel if you're caught with goonable loli&shota it should be used as grounds to go over the rest of your electronics with a fine toothed comb, but if all they find is 50GB of Card Captor Sakura BDSM piss-porn... just being a creeper into 900-year old dragons isn't something we need to be jailing people for.
 
Ghostse said:
but if all they find is 50GB of Card Captor Sakura BDSM piss-porn... just being a creeper into 900-year old dragons isn't something we need to be jailing people for.
Click to expand...
50 gb of JPEG's is roughly 25,000 images. Nah. Send the pedo to the rape dungeon. They clearly are too far gone and have worse stuff
 
Gatcha Gonna Getcha said:
God the comment section is disgusting
Click to expand...
Well, to that effect, it would be the same thing if we had narcotics being legal (or decriminalized, at least), and suddenly there was a tightening or control over it. Of course addicts will screech and use pseudo arguments regarding the "frozen peaches", ignoring pornography and its consumption isn't a "speech".
WelperHelper99 said:
What's important is the (c) portion. "Taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, or political value". This basically only hits porn. Anything with a plot is out of bounds
Click to expand...
Interesting to know! Thank you.
WelperHelper99 said:
Oh the seethe is at a fever pitch
https://youtube.com/watch?v=MDquECT9-toChibi especially is being petulant
Click to expand...
The "funny" thing about this: all those coming out of the woodwork and screeching about this bill deserve scrutiny. Or at the very least, to be put on a watchlist; proving they don't have the maturity to read (illiteracy) or are functionally illiterate - as in, can read but not understand what they read.
Nigga Bullshit said:
> Lolicons were the 1st line of defense against art censorship
Lmao you guys didn't do shit. You're all pedophiles, no one gives a fuck what you think.
Click to expand...
These guys prove that kike who wrote that retarded and paraphrased poem to bash Germany during WWII "first they came for da juice but I didn't speak up because I wasn't a juice!!!111".
Lolitrannies slept while tyranny was going on back in 2010s, and only suddenly they wake up now.
Of course, everyone here knows that, but they should just fuck off and die.
Vygode said:
I'm still angry these filthy degenerate pieces of shit are why we can't have free speech on the internet. Fuck them
Click to expand...
I hear you. Typical libertines, who think "freedom" means the liberty to use narcotics, destroy your body or destroy your life with dopamine. Clearly what the Founding Fathers thought when writing the constitution.
 
Good. I'm sick of these pornsick lolicon freaks making us normal anime fans look bad. You have a cute anime girl as your pfp, and everyone assumes you're a creep, and in sick of it!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom