Logo Designs - ur help needed ok

[Kartoffel]

It doesn't. The text has to be traced, otherwise it uses your available system fonts.

Oh, you can actually change text directly into curves, but you cannot use text tools anymore or change it back. Gimme 5 minutes.

Edit: @Null Does it work right now?

 

[Null]

@Kartoffel, sorry for the late response -- been doing a ton.

Thanks for vectorizing that, it's looking good. The only thing I can ask for at this point is for really nitty-gritty stuff. Would you mind going through and straightening out the lettering so that all the limbs are equal width and straight?

 

[Kartoffel]

@Kartoffel, sorry for the late response -- been doing a ton.

Thanks for vectorizing that, it's looking good. The only thing I can ask for at this point is for really nitty-gritty stuff. Would you mind going through and straightening out the lettering so that all the limbs are equal width and straight?

I can do that, but I can't give an estimate when I'm ready, I've got an exam soon. Do you mean just the "Fav" part or the "orr.it", too?

 

[Null]

I can do that, but I can't give an estimate when I'm ready, I've got an exam soon. Do you mean just the "Fav" part or the "orr.it", too?

The bottom text is fine, it's the FAV letters that need very specific attention to detail so that they look uniform and deliberate.

 

[Kartoffel]

The bottom text is fine, it's the FAV letters that need very specific attention to detail so that they look uniform and deliberate.

Okay, I tried it in the quickest way possible; but that ment slight readjustments of the bottom text, so I could use the grid for alignment.
If you want the original proportions just inform me, but that will take me some time.

 

[Null]

Okay, I tried it in the quickest way possible; but that ment slight readjustments of the bottom text, so I could use the grid for alignment.
If you want the original proportions just inform me, but that will take me some time.

That's already much better, you did well. The only thing I can see (and maybe it's like, an optical illusion?) is that diagnol bars in the V and A are different widths than the horizontal bars.

 

[Kartoffel]

That's already much better, you did well. The only thing I can see (and maybe it's like, an optical illusion?) is that diagnol bars in the V and A are different widths than the horizontal bars.

On the bottom everything is three units wide, the same as the F-bars are high. If you meassure the width of the diagonal orthogonal to the outlines it's a bit less wide. You can see it here; the little boxes are identical.

 

[Null]

On the bottom everything is three units wide, the same as the F-bars are high. If you meassure the width of the diagonal orthogonal to the outlines it's a bit less wide. You can see it here; the little boxes are identical.
View attachment 138777

Sec, I'm going through and very autistically editing every point to be mathematically flawless lmfao

 

[Null]

How does this look?

https://my.mixtape.moe/jrkzzo.svg

 

[Kartoffel]

@Null looks good, but I have no direct comparison. You could post a few variants next to each other, generally people can evaluate graphics stuff much better this way. It might look great if the disparity between bottom and top width of diagonals would be even greater (but it could look awful, too).
I'd at least try a version which incorporates the golden ratio; there's often the case that something looks already good and is just a little bit off and looks even better when adjusted to it.